SUBJECT INDEX BY CASE: ARBITRATION AWARDS UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(c) OF THE DSU

U-Z

 

Index:  A-B  C-D  E-H  I  J  K-T  U-Z


ON THIS PAGE:

US — 1916 Act
US — Gambling
US — Hot-Rolled Steel
US — Offset Act (Byrd Amendment)
US — Oil Country Tubular Goods Sunset Reviews
US — Section 110(5) Copyright Act
US — Stainless Steel (Mexico)
 


US — 1916 Act (WT/DS136/11, WT/DS162/14)     back to top

burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB.6.4

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

burden of proof ARB.6.4

complexity of implementation process ARB.5.4.4-5

complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.1

flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5.12.1

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.5.1.8

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.1.8

 
US — Gambling (WT/DS285/13)     back to top

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)

choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.1.12

legislative/administrative action ARB.5.6.15-17

developing countries and (DSU 21.2)

implementing Members, applicability to ARB.5.10.8-9

“particular circumstance” (DSU 21.3(c)), whether ARB.5.10.8-9

“reasonable period” ARB.5.10.7-9

developing countries and (DSU 21.7 and DSU 27.8) ARB.5.10.8

mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1.12, ARB.5.6.15-17

prompt compliance (DSU 21.1), as key consideration ARB.4.3.13

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

burden of proof ARB.6.8

complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.5

EU procedures and ARB.5.12.4

flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5.12.4

legislative action on other measures, relevance ARB.5.13.1-3

legislative schedule, relevance ARB.5.11.2

multiple periods, possibility of ARB.4.4.1

“reasonableness” as key consideration ARB.4.3.13

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.3.13

 
US — Hot-Rolled Steel (WT/DS184/13)     back to top

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)

consistency with WTO obligations, responsibility for determining ARB.1.9

mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1.9, ARB.5.3.3

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB.4.1.3-4

“reasonable period”

administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5.5.8, ARB.5.6.5

complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.3

contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.8

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.2.7

 
US — Offset Act (Byrd Amendment) (WT/DS217/14, WT/DS234/22) ARB.2.9     back to top

burden of proof

developing countries and ARB.5.10.5

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time, “reasonable period” ARB.6.5-6

prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2.9

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)

choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.3.1.4, ARB.3.2.1

withdrawal or modification options ARB.3.1.3

developing countries and (DSU 21.2) ARB.5.10.5

mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1.10

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5.6.9

burden of proof ARB.6.5-6

complexity of implementation process ARB.5.4.10, ARB.5.6.10

complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.4

“complexity” as legal criterion ARB.5.5.10

contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.10

economic harm likely to accrue to nationals of other Members, relevance ARB.5.9.2

legislative schedule, relevance ARB.5.11.1

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4.3.8-9, ARB.5.9.2, ARB.6.5-6

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.1.5, ARB.4.2.9

 
US — Oil Country Tubular Goods Sunset Reviews (WT/DS268/AB/R)     back to top

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)

choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.5.6.14

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process, developing countries and ARB.5.10.6

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

complexity of implementation process ARB.5.6.13-14

flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.2.10, ARB.4.3.12

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4.3.12, ARB.5.6.14, ARB.5.10.6

 
US — Section 110(5) Copyright Act (WT/DS160/12)     back to top

AB reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 17.14), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.2.1

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)

prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2.6

actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB.5.2.1

discretion and ARB.2.6

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.4

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4.3.5

panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.2.1

 
US — Stainless Steel (Mexico) (WT/DS344/AB/R)     back to top

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)

choice of means at Member’s discretion

legislative/administrative action ARB.5.13.4-5

withdrawal or modification options ARB.1.18

mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1.17-18

implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5.13.4-5

complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.6

contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.12

relevant factors ARB.1.17

precedent, implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), “reasonable period” ARB.5.14.1

 


The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.