The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.

balance of payments restrictions

GATT XVIII:11, Ad Note

“would thereupon produce”

removal of restrictions and recurrence of one of GATT XVIII:9 conditions, causal relationship B.1.1.1

temporal sequence B.1.1.2

GATT XVIII:11, Proviso (change in development policy), macroeconomic instruments, relevance B.1.2

GATT XVIII:B

DSU, applicability to disputes relating to J.2.1.4-7

special or additional rule and procedure (DSU 1.2 and Appendix 2), whether J.2.1.4

Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994, Footnote 1

as aid to interpretation I.3.10.7

applicability of DSU and J.2.1.5-6
 

beef, AMS calculation, “constituent data and methodology”, absence A.1.2.2
 

bilateral agreements, covered agreement, whether B.2.1
 

burden of proof B.3.1

allocation

comparative difficulties, relevance B.3.1.12

general rule/exception, relationship, relevance, SPS 3.1 and 3.3 B.3.1.11

importance of issue, relevance B.3.1.15

completion of legal analysis by AB and B.3.1.17, C.4.15, C.4.25

cost of production (AG), measurement A.1.22.4

defences and exceptions B.3.3

Enabling Clause B.3.3.8-14

inconsistency with GATT I:1, sufficiency as basis of complaint B.3.3.13-14, E.1.1.4

GATS XIV (general exceptions) B.3.3.16

GATS XIV(a) (necessity test) B.3.3.17-19, G.4.3

GATT XVIII:11 and Ad Note B.3.3.5

GATT XX B.3.3.1-2

measures which result in a higher level of protection than international standards (SPS 3.3) B.3.3, B.3.3.3

party’s two-stage obligation to raise and prove B.3.3.12, B.3.3.16

permissive provision as defence/exception B.3.3.8

rebuttal as parties’ obligation B.3.3.16, C.2.6, S.7.2.6

SCM 3.1(a) (Annex I (Illustrative List of Export Subsidies)), Footnote 59, fifth sentence B.3.3.7

order of analysis O.2.3

SCM 3.1(a) (Annex I (Illustrative List of Export Subsidies))/SCM 27 (developing countries) B.3.3.2, B.3.3.4, B.3.3.6

double taxation measures, justification S.2.38.3

export subsidy: see export subsidy, definition, “contingent upon export performance” (AG 1(e)/SCM 3.1(a)), burden of proof

legislation as such, challenge to B.3.1.13

onus probandi actori incumbit as general principle of evidence A.1.34.2, A.1.34.6, A.1.34.8, B.3.1.1, B.3.1.3, B.3.1.11, B.3.1.14, B.3.3.17-19, B.3.4.5, G.4.3.1

defences/exceptions and B.3.3

panel’s obligation to apply correctly B.3.1.5

panel’s right to draw on arguments and facts adduced by respondent B.3.1.6, S.4.7

panel’s right to seek information and advice (DSU 13/SPS 11.2), relevance B.3.1.6, B.3.2.3, S.4.7, S.7.3.8

expert evidence, timing of request for B.3.2.5

party’s obligation to identify relevant provisions of legislation B.3.1.16, E.3.8

presumption of consistency of measure with WTO obligations A.1.34.2, B.3.1.14, M.5.8

clarity/ambiguity of measure L.1.11, M.5.8

as general principle of evidence B.3.1.1

party’s obligation to demonstrate inconsistency in relation to each element of claim B.3.2.13

prima facie case B.3.1.14, B.3.2, S.1.36.3

evidence and legal arguments in support of claim, need for B.3.2.7, B.3.2.14-17

examination of respondent’s defence and evidence, timing B.3.2.6

hypothetical claims, need to address B.3.2.9-11

other party’s obligation to rebut, whether G.4.3.1-2

panel ruling in favour, need for B.3.2.2, B.3.2.4, B.3.2.9

panel’s duty not to make case for complaining party B.3.1.6

as precondition to ruling on claim B.3.2.13, B.3.2.17

proof of fact distinguished B.3.2.8

in rebuttal S.1.36.3

refusal to provide information, relevance B.3.2.4

standard of proof B.3.2.1-2, B.3.2.9-10

text of legislation, sufficiency B.3.1.13, B.3.2.12

procedures, modification W.3.3

“reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB. 4.2.10, ARB. 5.6.4, ARB. 6

responding party’s obligation in respect of own case B.3.1.4

reversal in case of establishment of prima facie case B.3.1.1, B.3.1.2

reversal in respect of circumvention of export subsidy commitments (AG 10.3) A.1.29B.1, A.1.34, A.1.34.9-11, B.3.4

AG 10.3 as special procedural provision A.1.34.3

budgetary outlay and quantity commitments distinguished A.1.34.4, A.1.34.5-7, B.3.4.2

DSU 6.2 requirements distinguished A.1.34A.1

“establish” A.1.34.6, A.1.34.9

SCM claims, applicability to A.1.34.10, A.1.38.14, A.1.38.1.15, B.3.4.3, B.3.4.4, S.2.39.2-8

unscheduled products, applicability to A.1.34.11, B.3.4.4

reversal in respect of presumption of nullification or impairment (DSU 3.8) N.3.2-3

review of continuing need for countervailing duties (SCM 21.2) S.2.31.1-2

SPS measures B.3.3.3, S.6.6.3, S.6.7.1-2

standard of review (DSU 11) and

need for separate findings on each element of claim[s], whether B.3.1.10

need to identify where burden lies, whether B.3.1.9

unforeseen developments, safeguard measures (GATT XIX:1(a)) S.1.22.3
 

business confidential information: see confidentiality of proceedings (DSU 17.10/18.2)

Abbreviations used on this page