
SEE
ALSO:
> press
releases
> news
archives
> Supachai
Panitchpakdi’s speeches
|

SH.E. Mr. Lu
Fuyuan, Minister of Commerce of China,
Dr. Kim Hak-Su, United Nations Under Secretary-General and Executive Secretary, United
Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP),
Professor Xu Zhihong, President Peking University and Vice-President,
Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Professor Li Yining, Dean of the Guanghua School of Management, Peking
University,
Professor Zhu Suli, Dean of Peking University Law School,
Mr. Gao Zongze, Representative of All China Lawyers Association,
Excellencies,
Participants to this Advanced Training Programme,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I should like to welcome you to this Opening Session of the Doha
Development Agenda Advanced Training Programme for Senior Government
Officials from Asia-Pacific countries. This Advanced Training Programme,
an important WTO technical cooperation and capacity building activity,
is a joint endeavour between the WTO Secretariat, UNESCAP, the Ministry
of Commerce of China, and Peking University. This Advanced Training
Programme is also being brought to nine other regional centres in the
world.
I should like
to thank China, its government and people, for hosting this course and
for placing such excellent facilities at the disposal of the partner
organizations and participants. I should also like to acknowledge the
efforts of Dr. Kim Hak-Su and Asia-Pacific leaders to meet the
challenge of development and contribute to peace, security and human
welfare through domestic reform, including trade liberalization. The
WTO Secretariat stands ready to help you as your countries seek to
reform, liberalize and develop.
At Doha, in
November 2001, WTO Ministers launched the most ambitious and
wide-ranging trade negotiations ever. These negotiations include
agriculture, services, non-agricultural goods, the environment, and WTO
rules (encompassing regional trade arrangements, the Dispute Settlement
Understanding and trade remedies). There are also negotiations under way
to make Special and Differential Treatment Provisions “more precise,
effective and operational” and to provide the possibility of having
cheaper access to certain medicines for poor countries. In addition,
work programmes were established for possible new framework agreements
in investment, competition, government procurement and trade
facilitation. Members are also examining in depth the links between
trade, debt and finance; the links between trade and transfer of
technology; and, the circumstances of Small Economies. Although staged
target deadlines have been set for specific areas of the negotiations,
the overall final deadline for the completion of the negotiations is 1 January 2005. The workload for all countries, but particularly for the
developing and least developed countries, is very heavy. Let me stress
that we must work to the time-frames, if we want to achieve the set
goals and meet the overall time frames.
At Doha,
Ministers acknowledged and reaffirmed the fact that trade is an engine
for development. The overriding objective in the negotiations is to
ensure that trade functions as a tool for development. Improving human
welfare and attaining development goals are the ultimate ends of
government policy. At Doha, for the first time-ever, development
objectives were placed at the heart of a new trade round. This was made
possible for several reasons. The vast majority, if not all WTO Members,
participated fully, constructively and with focus. The broad spectrum of
Members’ interests was represented through sensible and practical
positions by all participating Ministers. Ministers were committed to
the principal objectives of rejecting protectionism, eliminating trade
barriers, stimulating growth, creating jobs, improving the welfare of
their people and, hence, contributing to peace and security. It was
recognized that development, peace and security are inextricably linked,
and that trade has an indispensable contribution to make because it
generates income, creates wealth and jobs.
To achieve a
similar broad-based and satisfactory conclusion to the on going
negotiations and work programme by 1 January 2005, the Director-General
has continuously urged Ministers to engage with each other, as they did
in setting the agenda at Doha: fully and constructively, and with a
willingness to compromise.
Under the
Doha Development Agenda, developing countries will have the opportunity
to achieve better market access for their products in developed
countries, but also in developing countries to which their products are
exported.
Multilateral
institutions can help contribute to training negotiators and assisting
with the development of national institutional capacity for trade policy
formulation and advocacy. This is why at Doha, WTO Ministers undertook a
massive and unprecedented set of technical cooperation and capacity
building commitments that would enable developing and least-developed
countries effectively participate in the Doha Negotiations and Work
Programme. The commitments were also designed to assist developing and
least-developed countries to exercise the rights of membership and draw
on the benefits of the open, rules-based multilateral trading system.
The WTO Secretariat is responding concretely to the challenge.
Significant progress has been made in this area. Nonetheless, I must
emphasise that the scale of the demand, the urgency of the needs and the
ever-expanding list of priorities on the part of recipient countries are
so huge that the WTO Secretariat cannot alone fulfil these expectations.
The purpose
of this advanced training programme is to strengthen the effective
participation of Members and Observers in the Doha Development Agenda
Negotiations and Work Programme through policy analysis, a deeper
understanding of the issues and a better knowledge of the range of
options available. In the discussions that underpinned the Doha
paragraphs on technical cooperation and capacity building, recipient
countries were critical of the traditional focus of WTO technical
cooperation and training activities on assisting countries to
“understand” already negotiated and agreed rules, but being weak on
building effective negotiating capacity to establish new rules. They
were right. This training programme is a creative response to the
challenge put to us by Members and Observers to improve on our technical
cooperation and capacity building, by making our activities more
negotiation-relevant. It will focus on real issues at the centre of the
Doha Negotiations and Work Programme.
These 10
advanced intensive 2-week training courses are complemented by the
regular trade policy courses which run for three months at the WTO
Secretariat in Geneva. Because these were so highly regarded, we took
them to two African countries last year: Kenya and Morocco, for
Anglophone and Francophone African countries respectively. Two more will
be held this year before the Cancun Ministerial. We are looking into the
possibility of expanding these trade policy courses to other regions by
2004 and beyond.
These
advanced courses are a core part of the TA activities in the 2003 WTO
Technical Assistance Plan authorized by the membership last November.
This latest Plan incorporates the significant progress that has been
made in the area of technical cooperation and capacity building. The
implementation of the 2002 TA Plan, which was authorized by the
Membership on 6 March 2002 as part of the implementation of the Doha
commitments, was satisfactory and positive. The 2003 TA Plan continues
to implement the Doha commitments, and builds on the achievements of the
2002 TA Plan. As the Director-General reported to WTO Members in the
General Council in December 2002, the progress made on Technical
Cooperation and Capacity Building since Doha has been significant and
positive, enabling beneficiary countries to effectively engage in the on
going negotiations. The Membership shared this assessment. The
Director-General also emphasised his firm commitment to the design of a
WTO technical cooperation and capacity building programme that will
endure and serve the Membership well beyond the Doha negotiations.
A number of
countries here are LDCs. I am pleased to report that substantive
progress has been made, at three levels, to help integrate Least
Developed Countries into the Multilateral Trading System, in accordance
with the Doha mandate. First, a WTO Work Programme for LDCs was adopted
by the Membership on 12 February 2002. Second, much progress has been
made with regard to the Integrated Framework for the LDCs. This is the
mechanism for assisting LDCs to mainstream trade into their plans for
national economic development and strategies for poverty reduction.
Discussions are underway amongst agencies, donors and the LDCs on the
extension of the Integrated Framework to more LDCs. Third, in a historic
decision, Members agreed to guidelines to facilitate LDCs’ accession to
the WTO.
I would like
to assure you of the WTO's firm determination and commitment to
effectively implement measures to assist Asia-Pacific countries and to
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their participation in the
work of the WTO.
Let me say a
few words on the progress of the Doha Development Agenda negotiations.
At the last meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC) held on
4-5 March 2003, the Director-General reported to Members his assessment
on the state-of-play of the negotiations. He indicated that although
progress has been made on all fronts, it has been uneven and we have not
moved as quickly as we need to. We were unable to meet the target
deadlines for 2002 on TRIPS and Health, implementation issues, and
special and differential treatment. Other deadlines are pressing in on
us; in tariffs, on modalities for the overall negotiations in
agriculture, in services, and in dispute settlement.
The
Director-General emphasized that more clarity is needed in negotiating
positions. The Director-General reiterated that entrenched positions on
key issues and a lack of real engagement have combined to bring the
Round to a very serious point. Flexibility is a necessary pre-condition
to finding compromises and forging consensus. It is essential that all
areas of the negotiations move forward together. This will provide an
overall picture of the balance of gains and concessions under the Single
Undertaking. We cannot tempt failure by procrastinating, engaging in
trade brinkmanship, or holding out for last minute deals.
Let me
conclude by briefly emphasising that the 5th WTO Ministerial Meeting in
Cancun is only six months away. To ensure that we have a successful
Ministerial Meeting, the Director-General is appealing to Ministers to
fully and proactively engage in the process. The Director-General
believes that a successful ministerial meeting is one in which the
outcome is balanced, with positive results for strengthening global
demand, increasing growth, and at the same time generating benefits for
all our Members. Such an outcome is only possible with the full
engagement by Ministers steering the process and directing their trade
negotiators in Geneva.
Thank you for
your kind attention. |
|