> Disputes in the WTO
> Find disputes cases
> Find disputes documents
> Disputes chronologically
> Disputes by subject
> Disputes by country
This summary has been prepared by the WTO Secretariat’s Information and
Media Relations Division to help public understanding about developments
in WTO disputes. It is not a legal interpretation of the issues, and it is
not intended as a complete account of the issues. These can be found in
the reports themselves and in the minutes of the Dispute Settlement
Implementation back to top
& DS162: United States — Anti-dumping Act of 1916
The United States announced that legislation repealing the 1916 Act had
been favourably reported out of the Committee on the Judiciary of the US
House of Representatives on 29 January 2004.
The European Communities noted the US' action but commented that the bill
would not terminate the pending court cases.
Japan took note of the US' report but also regretted the lack of
retroactive effect of the bill.
DS176: United States — Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998
The US said that it continued to work with US Congress to resolve this
The EC noted that there were presently two bills pending in US Congress
that would repeal Section 211. The EC added that these bills offered a
basis to resolve this dispute to the benefit of all.
Cuba argued that the US' lack of implementation was a manoeuvre to take
away Havana Club Holding's legitimate rights on the trademark Havana Club
and to protect the interests of the Bacardi company.
DS184: United States — Anti-dumping measures on certain hot-rolled steel
products from Japan
The US stated that the US Administration continued to work with the US
Congress to address the recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
Japan said that the US should fully implement as soon as possible.
DS207: Chile — Price band system and safeguard measures relating to
certain agricultural products
Chile reiterated that it had fully complied with the DSB recommendations.
Argentina said that it had a different point of view concerning Chile's
implementation and that the two countries were working to find a solution
to this dispute.
DS234: United States — Continued dumping and subsidy offset act of
The US reported that on 2 February 2004, the US Administration had
proposed repeal of this Act in its budget proposal for fiscal year 2005,
as it had done the previous year.
The EC welcomed the US President's calls for a repeal of the Byrd
Amendment but mentioned that a similar proposal made last year had not
resulted in any action in US Congress. The EC said that another round of
illegal disbursements under the Byrd amendment would be unacceptable. The
EC finally expressed hope that rapid implementation would make it
unnecessary to suspend concession vis-à-vis the US.
Canada said that as a result of the non-compliance, Canada and seven other
members of the WTO had been forced to seek authorization to retaliate
against the US. Canada however added that it did not favour disruptions to
trade and called again upon the US to repeal the Byrd Amendment.
Similarly, Chile, Japan, Korea and India noted the US' administration call
for the amendment's repeal and urged the US to implement as soon as
possible in order to avoid retaliation.
Panel requests back to top
DS294: United States — Laws, regulations and methodology for calculating
dumping margins (“zeroing”)
The EC requested the establishement a panel to examine the calculation
methodologies used by the US in establishing dumping margins. The EC
recalled that in the “Bed linen“ (DS141), the reports had found that the
EC methodology, known as “zeroing”, was WTO incompatible. The EC said that
it had since then stopped the use of that methodology and that WTO rules
should apply equally to every member.
The US responded that the US and the EC's methods were not identical and
that it was confident that its method would be found to be consistent with
US WTO obligations.
In accordance with the WTO dispute settlement rules, the US blocked this
first panel request by the EC.
DS301: European Communities — Measures affecting trade in commercial
In its first request, Korea asked for a panel to look at the EC's
Temporary Defence Mechanism (TDM). Korea explained that this mechanism
assisted EC shipyards that had allegedly suffered adverse effects caused
by unfair Korean competition. Korea argued that the TDM constituted a
unilateral determination of violation and a unilateral imposition of a
punitive measure aimed solely at one Member, Korea.
The EC expressed surprise at Korea's panel request, arguing that
consultations were still underway. The EC expressed even more surprise at
Korea's new request for consultations (WT/DS307) dated 13 February 2004.
Korea explained that its new request for consultations had been prompted
by the extension of the TDM which was originally meant to expire by the
end of March 2004.
The US said that it would be following this dispute with the utmost
The EC rejected Korea's first panel request.
Adoption of report back to top
DS257: United States — Final countervailing duty determination with
respect to certain softwood lumber from Canada
The US said that it was pleased by the results of the panel and Appellate
Canada said that, while disappointed in certain of the findings, it
welcomed these reports.
The EC welcomed the clarifications provided by the Appellate body on some
terms of the Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement.
The DSB adopted the Appellate Body report and the panel report as modified
by the Appellate Body.
New chairperson back to top
The meeting was suspended on this agenda item and will be reconvened at an
appropriate time, in light of the outgoing Chairman's absence, Ambassador
Shotaro Oshima of Japan.
back to top
Mexico thanked Chile for the withdrawal of its request for consultations
in the case “Mexico — Measures affecting the import of matches”
(WT/DS232). Mexico expressed hope that a mutually acceptable solution
would also be found in its disputes against Guatemala (WT/DS298) and
meeting back to top
The next regular meeting of the DSB will take place on 19 March 2004.
Search Documents Online
The links on each case number search Documents Online for all documents on that case. They open a new window: allow a moment for the results to appear.
You can perform more sophisticated
searches from the Documents
Online search facility (opens in new window) by defining multiple
search criteria such as document code WT/DSxxx (where “xxx” is the
case number), full text search or document date.