WTO: 2006 NEWS ITEMS

Lamy: “We can stay on track to successfully conclude the Round next year”

Director-General Pascal Lamy reported to the General Council on 14 December 2006 that “an increasing level of engagement” is starting to appear in consultations by the Chairs of the negotiating groups. He stressed the “need to maintain the rhythm of the informal work ... to exploit the window of opportunity in the first quarter of next year”.

> General Council

> Negotiations, implementation and development: the Doha agenda
> The Doha Declaration explained
> The Implementation Decision explained
> How the negotiations are organized
> The Trade Negotiations Committee

SEE ALSO:
> Press releases
> News archives
> Pascal Lamy’s speeches

Report by the Chairman of the Trade Negotiations Committee

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Since I last reported to the General Council in October, I have continued my contacts with Ministers, Senior Officials and members of parliaments, visiting among other places Brussels and Washington. I have also attended the APEC Ministerial Meeting in Hanoi, the 20 th Anniversary of the launching of the Uruguay Round in Montevideo, and the IPU Parliamentary Conference on the WTO. In all my contacts, the desire to come back to the negotiating table, and to do so rapidly, has been clear. The political will to conclude the Round is being reaffirmed constantly across the board. New flexibilities have been announced by major players in general terms. The challenge remains to translate this political will and these flexibilities signals into substantive changes in position, which are necessary in order to unblock the process.

In this context, I convened an informal meeting of the TNC on 16 November. I did so in the light of the signals I had received in my contacts with officials at every level, of a growing and widely-shared desire to make the most of every opportunity to lay the foundations for further progress. It had become clear that the number and frequency of informal contacts among Members, both in Geneva and beyond, which had been going on since the summer, had increased. I suggested that it was time to start to multilateralize these contacts and bring them back to the Negotiating Groups in Geneva.

In my opening remarks at this meeting, which were circulated in document JOB(06)/255, I set out a number of suggestions on what this would mean in practical terms. I made it clear that I was encouraging the Negotiating Group Chairs to carry out contacts and consultations as they judged most appropriate, underlining that it was only they who could determine the way ahead in each area and the speed with which the work should take place.

At the conclusion of the meeting, I was able to note a consensus on the working method I had suggested, which gave the green light to the Chairs to take up again their processes, in accordance of course with the usual principles of transparency and inclusiveness.

In line with what was agreed, the Chairs have started talking to Members in a variety of formats, from “fireside chats” to “transparency forums”, in order to explore possible options to take the negotiations ahead. Following the lead taken by the Chair of the Agriculture Special Session which I referred to at our 16 November informal TNC, the Chairs of the other Negotiating Groups are also now hard at work, undertaking the contacts and consultations they judge most appropriate, bearing in mind the different circumstances of the various Negotiating Groups.

I know that the Chairs are all mindful of the over-arching need for transparency and inclusiveness in their work, and a good number of open-ended consultations have been held so that they can inform participants of the contacts and consultations they have had and to offer all delegations an opportunity to exchange views.

While no real changes in numbers, notably in agriculture domestic support or tariff protection have shown up in these discussions so far, an increasing level of engagement is starting to appear. I believe this indicates a willingness to enter into discussions on substance. Members also continue to have contacts among themselves, in many cases to try to refine their negotiating positions, and I would encourage them to continue to do so. I know that further contacts are planned, including some at ministerial level early next year, at the invitation of our Swiss colleagues.

So we can be ready to engage fully on substance when the time comes, we need to maintain the rhythm of the informal work which is underway between now and the end-of-year break, and then increase it when we return after the break, in order to exploit the window of opportunity that remains ahead of us in the first quarter of next year.

As I have said before, we all know the value of what is already on the table, the other benefits which are potentially achievable through a successful conclusion to the Round, and the costs to all Members and the trading system if we fail. Failure could be just around the corner, but we need not turn that corner. With everyone contributing and playing their part, we can stay on track to take this Round to a successful conclusion next year.

That concludes my report. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact [email protected] giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.