In particular, during January — June 2010, 19 WTO
Members reported initiating a total of 69 new investigations, compared with 97
new investigations reported by 18 WTO Members for the corresponding period of
2009. A total of 14 Members reported applying 59 new anti-dumping measures
during the first semester of 2010, with a decrease of 5% than the 62 new
measures reported by 16 Members for the corresponding period of 2009.
Fifteen new investigations were opened by developed Members and 10 out of 59 new
final measures were applied by developed Members during the first half of 2010.
This compares with 15 new investigations begun and 15 new measures applied by
developed Members during the first half of 2009.
The Members reporting the highest number of new
initiations during January — June 2010 were India, reporting 17 new initiations,
followed by the European Union, reporting 8 new initiations, Argentina (7),
Brazil and Israel (5 each). Other Members reporting initiations were
Australia and China (4 each), Indonesia and Korea (3 each), Colombia, Thailand
and the United States (2 each), and Canada, Chile, Jamaica, Mexico, Chinese
Taipei, Turkey and Ukraine (1 each). These figures represented increases
for India, the European Union, Brazil and Israel, and declines for Argentina,
China, Indonesia, Colombia, the United States, Canada, Turkey and Ukraine.
The number of initiations by Australia and Mexico remained unchanged compared
with the numbers reported for January — June 2009. Chile, Jamaica, Korea,
Chinese Taipei and Thailand, which did not report new initiations for January —
June 2009, reported new initiations for the first semester of 2010, while Costa
Rica, Pakistan, Peru and South Africa, which reported new initiations for the
first half of 2009, did not report new initiations for the first half of 2010.
During the first half of 2010, China was the most
frequent subject of the new investigations, with 23 new initiations directed at
its exports. This was a 30% decrease from the 33 new investigations opened
in respect of exports from China during January — June 2009. The European
Union (including individual member States) was next with 11 new investigations
directed at its exports, followed by the United States (5), Korea and Thailand
(4 each), Malaysia and Chinese Taipei (3 each), Brazil and Japan (2 each), and
Belarus, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Chile, Dominican Republic, India, Indonesia,
Mexico, Norway, Singapore, South Africa, Ukraine, and Vietnam (one each).
The products most frequently affected by these new
investigations during the first half of 2010 were in the base metals sector (20
initiations), the chemicals sector (11 initiations), the plastics and rubber
sector (7 initiations) and the plaster and ceramic products sector (6
initiations). Of the 20 reported initiations relating to the base metals
sector, 6 were reported by India, 3 by Indonesia, two each by Colombia, the
European Union, Thailand and the United States, and one each by Argentina,
Israel and Korea.
Concerning application of new final anti-dumping
measures, India came at the top of the list, reporting 17 new measures during
January — June 2010, unchanged from the first half of 2009. Turkey was in second
place, reporting 9 new measures for the first half of 2010, followed by
Argentina and China (7 new measures each), the United States (5), Brazil (3),
Canada, the European Union and Israel (2 each), and Australia, Egypt, Mexico,
Peru, and South Africa (one each). Chile, Colombia, Korea, Pakistan and
Thailand, which had reported applying new measures during the first half of
2009, reported no new measures during the corresponding period of 2010.
Products exported from China were the most frequent
subject of new measures during January — June 2010, accounting for 25 out of 59
new measures during this period. This represented a decline of 17% compared
with the 30 new measures applied on Chinese exports during the first half of
2009. The European Union (including individual member States) was in second
place with 6 new measures applied on its exports during the first half of 2010,
followed by the United States (5 new measures applied on its exports), Chinese
Taipei (4), and Indonesia, Russian Federation and Thailand (3 each).
Australia; Hong Kong, China; India; the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Korea; Kuwait;
South Africa; Turkey; Ukraine; and Vietnam were subject to one measure each.
The sector most frequently affected by the new
measures applied during January — June 2010 was the base metals sector, products
of which accounted for 18 out of 59 measures reported. Products in the
chemicals sector were subject to 12 new measures, products in the plastics and
rubber sector were subject to 11 new measures, products in the textiles sector
were subject to 6 new measures, and products in the machinery and electrical
equipment sector were subject to 5 new measures, while products in the footwear
and plaster and ceramic sectors were subject to 2 new measures each.
Concerning the measures applied on products in the most affected sector (base
metals) India applied 7 out of the 18 reported new measures, China came in
second place with 3 new measures, Canada, Turkey and the United States came in
third place with 2 measures each, and the European Union tied with Mexico, each
reporting one new measure on products in this sector.
The data reported above are taken from the semi-annual
reports of Members to the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices. The
statistics are based on information from Members having submitted semi-annual
reports for the relevant periods, and are incomplete to the extent that Members'
reporting is incomplete. For the purpose of these statistics, each
investigation or measure reported covers one product imported from one country
or customs territory. The anti-dumping semi-annual reports by Members for
the period 1 January — 30 June 2010 can be found under document series
RSS news feeds
> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact email@example.com giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.