
Disclaimer:
Opinions expressed in the case studies and any errors or omissions
therein are the responsibility of their authors and not of the
editors of this volume or of the institutions with which they are
affiliated. The authors of the case studies wish to disassociate the
institutions with which they are associated from opinions expressed
in the case studies and from any errors or omission therein.
> Case
Studies main page
> Introduction
ON THIS PAGE:
> I. The problem in context
> II. The local and external players and their roles
> III. Challenges faced and the outcome
> IV. Lessons for others (the players’ views)
> References
|

I. The problem in context back to top
Malawi is a land-locked country occupying the
southern part of the Rift Valley in east Africa. It is bordered by
Zambia to the west, Mozambique to the south and east and Tanzania to the
north. In 2001, the estimated population in Malawi was 11 million (World
Bank 2003). This relatively small sub-Saharan African country is one of
the poorest in the world, with GDP per capita of US$163 in 2001 and over
half of the poor population living in the rural area.
Malawi is an open economy, but trade openness
has not fostered economic growth, as is indicated by the declining
figures for economic growth (from 6% in 1990 to -1% in 2001).
Merchandise trade has declined significantly over time, with exports
decreasing from US$442 million in 1999 to US$310 million in 2001, and
imports from US$698 million to US$550 million in the same period (World
Bank 2003). Tobacco, tea, sugar and coffee account for 90% of
merchandise exports, with tobacco as the main export. There have been
some efforts to diversify to non-traditional products such as fruit and
vegetables and spices. On the import side, the main imports are vehicles
and parts, petroleum fuels, machinery, boilers and parts, electrical
machinery, fertilizer, wheat flour, pharmaceuticals, iron and steel.
Agriculture contributes a little more than a
third (34%) to Malawi’s GDP, while the manufacturing and service
sectors account for 18% and 48% respectively (World Bank 2003). Most of
the activities in the service sector are non-tradable. The importance of
agriculture cannot be stressed enough: in addition to being the leading
export earner, approximately half of Malawi’s citizens who are in paid
employment work in the agricultural sector and 85% of the population are
supported by it (SADC 2001).
From the mid-1980s Malawi made tremendous
progress in trade liberalization under the structural adjustment
programme and continued to do so through the 1990s. Tariffs still remain
as the main trade policy instrument affecting trade. All tariffs are ad
valorem. The maximum applied tariff rate under the two-digit
Harmonized System (HS) is 25% and the average applied most-favoured-nation
(MFN) tariff rate is 13.6% (see Table 1). The
average rate in the agricultural sector is approximately 15% and in the
manufacturing sector 13%. Malawi has a six-band tariff structure (0, 5,
10, 15, 20, 25), with 60% of the lines at 10% or less (WTO 2002).
Tariffs between zero and 5% apply to ‘necessities’. High tariffs are
imposed on commodities such as coffee extracts, butter, sugar, apples,
tea and consumer goods. Malawi also shows some levels of tariff
escalation. Tariffs on unprocessed products are 30% lower than those on
fully processed products (MG and IAWG 2003). Malawi has bound all its
agricultural products at 125%, except for a few products with bound
rates of 50, 55 and 65%. Only 0.3% of non-agricultural products are
bound.
Table 1
Tariffs at the end of 2000/2001(per cent)
|
Indicator
|
All commodities
|
Agriculture
|
Non-agriculture
|
|
Bound tariff lines |
17.0 |
100.0 |
0.3 |
|
Duty-free tariff lines |
4.0 |
11.0 |
2.8 |
|
Simple average applied MFN rates |
13.6 |
15.2 |
13.3 |
|
Range of applied rates |
0—25.0 |
0—25.0 |
0—25.0 |
Source: WTO, based on data provided by
Malawian authorities.
Malawi has removed most of its non-tariff
barriers. However, a few import licences and bans for environmental,
health, safety and security reasons still exist. The Ministry of
Agriculture provides phytosanitary regulations, and the Ministry of
Commerce and Industry issues licences for wild animals and other import
licences in general. Approximately 29% of all product lines continue to
face non-tariff measures (UNCTAD 2001). In the case of live fish, for
example, trout face a tariff equivalent of 100%. Imports of this product
line require a licence from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
Import of live animals faces non-tariff measures of 50%. In 2001, Malawi
introduced import licences on sugar and import bans on dairy produce and
vegetable cooking oil. Even though sanitary and phytosanitary
requirements are applied, they are not used to curtail imports. Malawi,
like other developing countries, is in the process of preparing new
anti-dumping measures and introducing countervailing measures (MG and
IAWG 2003). Looking at exports, Malawi is a relatively open country.
Since the late-1990s, all trade taxes and quotas on exports have been
eliminated (WTO 2002). Export surrender remains only on tobacco, tea and
sugar. Export licences are required for a few commodities such as fuel
and maize for environmental protection and food security reasons. Tea
and raw tobacco are also subject to export licences.
In general, Malawi faces severe trade and
economic problems, including declining commodity prices, weak
infrastructure, lack of technology, high cost of inputs, lack of access
to financing, weak institutional and human capacity, high external debt
— all of these have a major impact on trade performance.
Given this picture, what do multilateral trade
negotiations mean for Malawi? Trade negotiations in the WTO offer a
multilateral forum for countries to take advantage of a rules-based
system for trade and development. However, Malawi is facing major
constraints even as the country is engaged in multilateral negotiations.
The objective of this short paper is to reveal these challenges from the
perspective of the stakeholders. The study does not focus on any
particular sector because most of the issues facing Malawi are across
the board. And once these challenges have been addressed, Malawi will be
able to grapple with more sector specific issues. To meet the objective
of this endeavour, representatives from different government ministries,
the private sector, non-government organizations (NGOs) and donors were
interviewed. These stakeholders are presented in section two. Section
three discusses the challenges faced by stakeholders. Based on their
experience, the last section offers lessons for others.
II. The local and external players and their roles back to top
Prior to 1994, Malawi was a one-party state
and the government handled trade issues. In recent years, with the
introduction of the multi-party system, the new governing structure has
made tremendous efforts to include the private sector and non-government
organizations in having a say in trade issues. Who are the main local
stakeholders? The main department responsible for trade and industry
policy is the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Even though trade
issues have taken centre stage in the domestic area, it is disconcerting
that the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) does not have a
sector-specific plan for trade, meaning that when resources are
allocated trade does not feature as a major priority in the development
agenda. The good news is that sector-specific trade issues have been
addressed in the Malawi economic growth strategy, and part of the
strategy will be incorporated in the revised PRS. Other government
ministries involved in trade issues include the Ministry of Agriculture,
Irrigation and Food Security, which has the main task of formulating
agricultural policies and the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning,
the overseer of the overall government budget as well as expenditure and
revenue measures; the Malawi Revenue Authority is responsible for tax
and tariff administration. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
Copyright Society (under the Ministry of Sports and Culture) and the
Patents Office (under the Ministry of Justice) also play an important
role in trade matters.
Other important public-sector players include
the Malawi Bureau of Standards (MBS), the Malawi Export Promotion
Council (MEPC) and the Reserve Bank of Malawi. The MBS is the designated
enquiry point for the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and
for the food safety aspects of the Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS)
Agreement. In addition, the MBS is one of the regulatory authorities to
formulate and implement national standards for products and services; it
needs better infrastructure and more trained staff to handle these heavy
responsibilities. The MEPC’s major responsibility is to promote export
diversification, as Malawi is overly reliant on a few commodities. In
addition to the need for more skilled import and export officers, the
MEPC is constrained by lack of information on foreign markets. The
Reserve Bank of Malawi is responsible for monetary and exchange rate
policies, as well as supervision of the financial services sector. The
key private-sector stakeholders include the Chamber of Commerce and
Industry, the Exporters’ Association of Malawi and Textiles and the
Garment Manufacturers of Malawi. These public and private players form
the National Working Group on Trade Policy, a sub-group of the National
Action Group. The National Working Group on Trade Policy is chaired by a
private-sector stakeholder. In addition to the participation of the
private and public sectors, NGOs such as the Malawi Economic Justice
Network and Action Aid Malawi also participate in WTO discussions.
Multilateral and bilateral donors such as the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Trade Centre (ITC),
the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the WTO,
the Norwegian embassy/NORAD, the Department of International Development
(DFID) and the US Agency for International Development (USAID), among
others, have been instrumental in assisting Malawi to address some of
the capacity constraints. This is being done through programmes such as
the Integrated Framework (IF), Joint Integrated Technical Assistance
Programmes (JITAP) and country and regional programmes. These
initiatives have led to a call from donors, for example the UNDP, for
technical assistance to be provided to enable Malawi to integrate into
the global system. Even though trade-related technical assistance is
vital to Malawi, the UNDP has stressed that issues of sustainability and
making sure that the country takes ownership of the programmes still
need to be addressed. As part of the consultation process, external
donors also attend the National Action Group meetings.
All the stakeholders welcome the multilateral
trade negotiations under the WTO. They feel that there is room for
Malawi to gain significantly from participating fully in the WTO
negotiations. However, in spite of the existence of the National Group
on Trade Policy, there has not been a strong interaction among
stakeholders. In fact, as observed by a government official, no formal
discussions on the way forward or any other WTO-related issues were
discussed after the Cancún Ministerial Conference. Most important
discussions, it appears, tend to be tabled as high-level WTO meetings
approach.
Apart from the lack of a more cohesive
interaction among stakeholders, Malawi’s participation is largely
affected by concerns about the large financial costs that may be
incurred as Malawi creates the institutions and implements the standards
demanded by the trading system, as well as by capacity constraints
arising from trade negotiations. These and other issues will be
discussed in the next section.
III. Challenges faced and the outcome
back to top
This section presents the views and challenges
faced by some key stakeholders. To start with, the Ministry of
Agriculture, Irrigation and Food Security, one of the key stakeholders,
considering that the country is an agriculture-based economy, recognizes
the importance of Malawi’s participation in the WTO. However for
Malawi to benefit from the WTO process, Mr Lungu, a senior ministry
official, argued that the country has to overcome some of the major
domestic bottlenecks because ‘if developed countries were to grant
Malawi free access to their market, supply-side constraints would hinder
the country from enjoying significant gains from the full access’. He
went on to say that the first thing Malawi needed to do was to address
the overarching issues of ‘low productivity and profitability of
smallholder farmers’ in the agricultural sector. Productivity has been
greatly affected by low-level development, poor varietal selection,
declining soil fertility and poor agricultural practices. The main cause
of low profitability is weak links to input and output markets. Farmers
are handicapped by lack of information and weak infrastructure,
resulting in high input costs and low output prices. Mr Lungu suggested
that the way to deal with these challenges was to ‘pursue targeted
investments to improve on production frequency, yields and strengthening
market linkages’.
With regard to developed countries, Mr Kabambe,
a senior ministry official at the time he was interviewed (but now a
permanent secretary in charge of poverty alleviation), considered that
there was a need to ‘level the playing field’ in multilateral trade
negotiations in order for developing countries to trust the system. The
use of trade distorting subsidies and high tariffs on products of
interest to Malawi are examples of developed countries ‘not playing
fair’. While there is this increased pressure for developed countries
to reduce high tariffs, Dr Daudi, a senior ministry official
specializing in standards at the time he was interviewed (but now a
permanent secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture), cautioned that
non-tariff barriers such as standards are on the rise. The challenge for
Malawi, as an exporter of mainly agricultural products and venturing
into exporting more processed products, is that it lacks trained
manpower and equipment to address these non-tariff barriers and to
comply with WTO commitments. This point was also reiterated by Dr Daudi’s
son at the Malawi Bureau of Standards (MBS), the designated enquiry
point for the Agreement on TBT and for food safety aspects of the SPS
Measures.
In addition to the constraints described
above, Mr Daudi said that even though the MBS was considered an enquiry
point, for effective operation they ‘needed assistance in setting up
and operating an enquiry point’. This could be done by learning from
other established enquiry points in the region or abroad. The MBS also
requires more information in order to understand TBT and SPS agreements
and their obligations. Such information is also not available to other
regulatory bodies which play a role in the implementation of the WTO
Agreements. Another factor affecting MBS operations as a fully
functioning enquiry point is its weak infrastructure. MBS is in
desperate need of an effective modern information technology system for
effective communication, storage and retrieval of information and
reproduction of documents. Also in the area of infrastructure, the MBS
lacks sufficient laboratory equipment to implement regulations
effectively within the framework of the WTO Agreements.
Turning to the Ministry of Trade and Industry
as the main co-ordinating body for WTO issues, the first thing that came
out in interviews was that the ministry was understaffed and could not
handle the massive coverage of WTO issues. Ms Musonzo, an economist in
charge of WTO issues, stated that ‘one staff member may be assigned to
work on two or three WTO agreements on top of other assigned duties in
the Ministry’. This lack of specialization, she continued, ‘makes it
impossible for us to fully grasp and interpret complex WTO agreements as
well as submit notifications’. Mr Hara, a senior economist and a
newcomer to WTO issues, commented that ‘we are not sufficiently
equipped in terms of manpower to carry out rigorous analytical work to
analyze WTO proposals’. These in-house capacity constraints are also
affected by the lack of representation in Geneva, a concern raised by
all the stakeholders interviewed. As a result of the lack of
representation, the ministry is not able to obtain all the information
on issues discussed in meetings in Geneva. On the implications of the
WTO in relation to Malawi, Mr Hara pointed out that Malawi has lower
average tariff (about 15%) compared with many WTO members. However, with
the lack of a proper safeguard mechanism and countervailing measures
further tariff reduction can lead to dumping. Therefore, there is the
need to have effective mechanisms to detect injury in case of surges of
imports. Another concern, as reflected in the ministry’s position
papers, is the erosion of preferences due to lower MFN tariffs.
According to the figures given by the ministry, Malawi is expected to
lose 11% of its export earnings due to preference erosion. The ministry
has begun to think about what Malawi should do when the erosion of
preferences occurs. So far there is talk about preserving preferences,
even if it is inevitable that preferences will be eroded due to
liberalization. If the preferences cannot to be preserved, Malawi will
request compensation for loss of preferences. This is also the position
of the Africa group.
A senior official at the Ministry of Economic
Planning and Development, Mr Mtonya, raised an important point on the
cost of compliance with WTO commitments when he stressed that ‘by
accepting the WTO commitments Malawi takes up obligations that may
impose a huge burden on the development budget. For Malawi to comply
with WTO agreements it would mean the government setting aside over 50%
of its budget, something not feasible considering that the country
already faces budget constraints in order to meet its expenditure in
many other areas. Therefore, there is need for financial and technical
assistance from donors to meet the cost of compliance of WTO
commitments.’ To add to this concern, Mr Zimpita, also at the Ministry
of Finance, expressed his concern about the revenue implications of
tariff reduction as ‘tariff revenue constitutes a major portion of
government revenue and the reduction in collection could have serious
consequences on the budget’. He felt, therefore, that rigorous
analysis of WTO proposals was needed in order to assess the cost and the
benefits. These sentiments were shared by the Malawi Revenue Authority.
The Malawi Confederation of Chambers of
Commerce and Industry (MCCI), representing the private sector, is
pushing for more public-private sector consultation. Mr Mtonakutha of
the MCCI indicated that the establishment of the Trade Policy National
Working Group, a body which brings together the public sector and the
private sector, was a major step forward; however, he said that more
still needed to be done considering that stakeholder co-ordination was a
recent development. Outside Malawi, the Chamber of Commerce also widely
consults with the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the
Associations of Chambers of Commerce of the Common Market of Southern
and Eastern Africa (COMESA).
On the NGO side, Action Aid Malawi shared some
of their documents on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (TRIPS). Action Aid formed part of the delegation of NGOs that
went to the Ministerial Conference in Cancún. Action Aid’s position
papers on agriculture made a significant contribution to Malawi’s
position. Their position paper on TRIPS focused on the Agreement and its
potential threat to food security and farmers’ rights. The group feels
that ‘patents on genetic resources for food and agriculture pose a
potential threat to the food security and the livelihoods of small-scale
farmers. Patents will reduce access to seeds and genetic resources for
farmers and breeders … They could also make seeds expensive due to
royalty payments, restrictive contracts and increased commercialization.’
This position paper by Action Aid Malawi supports the position of the
Africa Aid group on ‘no patents on life’. Also under TRIPS, given
the public health crisis, especially in the face of HIV/AIDS, malaria
and tuberculosis, Malawi is pushing for access to essential drugs on
affordable terms.
Most of the stakeholders, both local and
external, emphasized the importance of trade-related technical
assistance. However for technical assistance to be more effective,
external donors felt that several things have to be addressed. First,
there was a need for close collaboration among donors in order to avoid
any conflicts in policy recommendations. Second, workshops/seminars
should be attended by participants working in the departments directly
linked to trade negotiations. In other words, there is need for a
filtering process for technical assistance to be more effective. Third,
there should be a monitoring or a follow-up mechanism to track the
progress of participants. Last, experts should spend enough time in the
country to understand fully the problems that need to be addressed, as
well as build reasonable institutional capacity so that the government
can continue the process beyond the technical assistance life span.
IV. Lessons for others (the players’ views)
back to top
This paper has presented some of the views
held by stakeholders and the challenges faced by Malawi as it
participates in the multilateral trading system. Do small countries such
as Malawi need the WTO? Yes, given the size of the country and resource
constraints, the stakeholders are aware that the multilateral trading
system offers many opportunities in terms of gains from trade and
provides a strong rules-based structure to protect them against more
powerful countries. And the importance of the multilateral trading
system will become even greater as Malawi continues to integrate into
the global economy.
So what are the lessons for others, and the
areas to which Malawi should give priority in order to participate
effectively? From Malawi’s experience, lessons can be drawn on how to
bring trade into development; how countries may effectively utilize
technical assistance; the use of the safeguard mechanism and
countervailing measures as liberalization prevails; how to address some
of the constraints beyond tariffs and other border measures; and how to
handle the issue of preference erosion.
The cost of compliance with WTO commitments is
certainly a major issue for Malawi and many less developed countries (LDCs).
Therefore it calls for more financial resources to assist in the
compliance process. Countries must be aware that the WTO is not an
international financial institution. Therefore there is need to bring
trade into the development agenda. This could be done by linking
sector-specific trade policies with development strategies and
objectives, as well as linking assistance from international financial
institutions such as the World Bank to the trade agenda. Mr Mtonya at
the Ministry of Economic Planning and Development pointed out that
Malawi’s new Economic Growth Strategy includes a sector-specific
agenda for trade which will be linked to development assistance.
Malawi has a valid concern that developed
countries should reduce high tariffs and trade distorting subsidies.
However, the stakeholders are aware that gains from trade will not only
depend on the goodwill of the other members, but will also greatly
depend on what Malawi does. As pointed out by the staff at the Ministry
of Agriculture, ‘aggressively improving the transport system,
marketing systems, storage and distribution facilities, technology,
addressing factors affecting the cost of inputs, access to trade and
investment financing and exchange rate management’ will assure even
more gains.
Technical assistance to strengthen the
institutional capacity of Malawi, including the development of human
resource; strengthening the training of government officials; the
training of trainers; and the retention of government staff who work on
WTO issues are critical for Malawi to participate effectively. As
iterated by staff, Malawi needs well-trained and specialist staff to
cover each agreement. Technical assistance, however, should not be
viewed as ‘a form of financing’, but there should be a mechanism to
make sure that sustainability can be achieved and that trained employees
are retained. Otherwise, countries will continue to receive technical
assistance for the next ten to twenty years and nothing much will come
out of the programmes. One important suggestion from local stakeholders
is for donor agencies to assign personnel to spend a significant amount
of time in relevant government departments to build sufficient
institutional and human capacity. The sentiment of the local
stakeholders is that the ‘fly-in-fly-out’ works up to a point but
does not often leave much on the ground. And the funds used to pay
consultants and personnel flying in and out of the country can be
channelled to other activities on the ground. Also, given the
understaffing situation in most of the government, more technical
assistance in-house would lessen the staff shortages faced by government
departments when staff members attend much needed trade policy courses
and workshops.
Another point is that while the stakeholders
welcome the fact that liberalization is here to stay, Malawi should also
take serious precautions to make sure that their domestic markets are
not wiped out. Mr Lungu at the Ministry of Agriculture gave an
interesting example of what happened to the textiles and clothing
industry. With the liberalization of the second-hand clothing market,
the already deteriorating textiles and clothing industry was severely
affected. The garments produced in Malawi have been found to be more
expensive than second-hand clothing, and as a result, some of the major
factories could not compete with the cheaper prices offered by the
second-hand clothing industry and they were forced to close. Initially,
the influx of second-hand clothing was seen as ‘the best thing that
ever happened to Malawi’, but the consequences to the clothing
industry were devastating. Although to some the closure of the major
textiles and clothing factories can be viewed as ‘injury’, Malawi at
the moment does apply anti-dumping measures to protect domestic
industries and sensitive products. The good news is that Malawi is now
in a process of preparing a new anti-dumping law and safeguard and
countervailing measures.
In the case of trade preference, Malawi should
focus its energy on how the country will adjust to the erosion brought
about by the liberalization process. As mentioned earlier, there is a
suggestion by some of the stakeholders that they should preserve
preferences and if that fails, they should ask for some form of
compensation for any loss of preference. Although these points are
noble, countries should recognize that this could also be an opportunity
to sell their commodities to other countries. Mr Banda at the Ministry
of Trade and Industry pointed out that Malawi was already exporting more
tobacco to Egypt and sugar to Kenya, a sign of market diversification.
Other lessons that Malawi could provide to
other LDCs are to extend tariff bindings beyond agriculture to the
manufacturing sector; increase programmes to enhance the participation
of the private sector and other stakeholders so that supply-side
constraints are addressed; and most importantly, to make sure that
countries have missions at the WTO in Geneva.
References
back to top
Malawi Government (2003), Draft Issues Paper
for the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference, Lilongwe: Ministry of Commerce
and Industry
Malawi Government and the Integrated Framework Inter-Agency Working
Group (MG and IAWG) (2003), Malawi-Integrated Framework: Diagnostic
Trade Integration Study (draft)
SADC (2001). Official SADC Trade, Industry and Investment
Review, Gaborone: SADC
UNCTAD (2001), TRAINS Database, Geneva: WTO
World Bank (2003), World Development Indicators 2003 (CD),
Washington, DC: World Bank
WTO (2002), Malawi: Trade Policy Review, Geneva: WTO
|

* University of Pretoria.
|