
See
also:
> Doha
Ministerial briefing notes
Meeting
summaries:
> 14 November
> 13 November
> 12 November
> 11 November
> 10 November
Other
WTO Ministerials:
>
Singapore
9–13 Dec.
1996
>
Geneva
18 & 20 May 1998
>
Seattle
30 Nov–3 Dec.1999
|

“ … I now would like to submit to delegations for their
consideration and adoption, three draft texts which have emerged from
the process of intensive decisions and negotiations that we have had
over the past few days. These texts are the following:
- the draft Ministerial Declaration in document
WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W/1,
- two, the draft Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public
Health in document WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W/2, and
- the third, the draft Decision on Implementation-Related
Issues and Concerns in document WT/MIN(01)/W/10
Before I propose action on these three texts, allow me to offer
my sincere thanks to the Director-General and all of the ministers
who have assisted me so ably as Friends of the Chair. I would also
like to pay tribute to the hard work and dedication of the Chair of
the General Council, the Deputy Directors-General and the
Secretariat, and all the ministers and delegations representing
their governments at this Ministerial Conference.
The past five days have seen a tremendous amount of committed
work by all delegations. Throughout this process I have done my
utmost to ensure full transparency and inclusiveness, and I am
grateful for the spirit of cooperation and goodwill shown by all
participants.
I would like to note that some
delegations have requested clarification concerning paragraphs 20,
23, 26 and 27 of the draft declaration. Let me say that with respect
to the reference to an ‘explicit consensus’ being needed, in
these paragraphs, for a decision to be taken at the Fifth Session of
the Ministerial Conference, my understanding is that, at that
session, a decision would indeed need to be taken by explicit
consensus, before negotiations on trade and investment and trade and
competition policy, transparency in government procurement, and
trade facilitation could proceed.
In my view, this would also give each member the right to take a
position on modalities that would prevent negotiations from
proceeding after the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference
until that member is prepared to join in an explicit consensus.
I would like to suggest that we take action on the three draft
texts before I give the floor to delegations who wish to do so to
make a statement for the record.
First I should like to propose that the Ministerial Conference
adopt the draft Ministerial Declaration in document
WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W/1. May I take it that this is agreeable to members?
It is so agreed. (Gavel, applause, congratulations.)
I should like to propose that the Ministerial Conference adopt
the draft Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public
Health in document WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W/2. May I take it that this
is agreeable?
(Gavel, applause.)
Finally I should like to propose that the Ministerial Conference adopt
the draft Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and
Concerns in document WT/MIN(01)/W/10
With regard to the outstanding implementation issues, I would
like to recall the cover letter of 5 November 2001, sent
to me by the Chairman of the General Council and the Director
General, which accompanied the draft decision on implementation. It
states that the draft decision proposes immediate action on a number
of implementation issues, and provides that remaining issues, which
include those referred to WTO bodies as well as those listed in
their completion will be addressed in the course of the future work
programme in accordance with paragraph 12 of the draft
ministerial declaration.
May I take it that the draft Decision on
Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns in document
WT/MIN(01)/W/10 is acceptable to delegations?
(Gavel, applause.)
May I now offer the floor to delegations wishing to make a
statement for the record … . ”
|
|