DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS347

European Communities and Certain Member States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint)


This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.

  

See also:
The basics: how disputes are settled in WTO
Computer based training on dispute settlement
Text of the Dispute Settlement Understanding


Current status  back to top

 

Key facts  back to top

Short title:
Complainant:
Respondent:
Third Parties:
Agreements cited:
(as cited in request for consultations)
Request for Consultations received:

  

Summary of the dispute to date  back to top

The summary below was up-to-date at

Consultations

Complaint by the United States.

On 31 January 2006, the United States requested consultations with the Governments of France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom (the “member States”) and with the European Communities (“EC”) concerning measures affecting trade in large civil aircraft. (See also dispute WT/DS316).

The United States considered that measures of the EC and the member States provide subsidies that are inconsistent with their obligations under the SCM Agreement and the GATT 1994.  The United States is concerned that the launch aid provided by the EC and the member States to Airbus for the development of large civil aircraft and the EIB loans provided to Airbus appear to be subsidies that are inconsistent with Articles 3.1(a), 3.1(b) and 3.2 of the SCM Agreement.

The United States is concerned that the measures of the EC and the member States that are the subject of their request for consultations appear to be causing adverse effects to US interests within the meaning of Articles 5(a), 5(c), 6.3(a), 6.3(b) and 6.3(c) of the SCM Agreement.

The United States is also concerned that the measures appear to be inconsistent with Articles III:4 and XVI:1 of the GATT 1994.

On 10 April 2006, the United States requested the establishment of a panel. At the DSB meeting on 20 April 2006, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At the DSB meeting on 9 May 2006, the DSB established a panel. Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan and Korea reserved their third-party rights. On 7 July 2006, the United States requested the Director-General to determine the composition of the Panel. On 17 July 2006, Deputy Director-General Alejandro Jara composed the Panel.

 

Withdrawal/termination

On 9 October 2006, the Chairman of the Panel informed the DSB that the United States had requested the Panel on 6 October 2006 to suspend its work, in accordance with Article 12.12 of the DSU. The Panel had agreed to this request. As the Panel had not been requested to resume its work, the authority of the panel lapsed as of 7 October 2007.

image 160 pixels wide
  

Find all documents from this case
(Searches Documents Online, most recent documents appear on top)

quick help with downloading
> comprehensive help on Documents Online

all documents

  

Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.