|
India — Additional Import Duties
(WT/DS360/AB/R)
back to top
burden of proof, prima facie case, closely
related provisions (GATT II:1(b) and II:2(a)) and B.3.3.21
implementation of panel/AB recommendations, right
of panel/AB to make suggestions for (DSU 19.1)
discretionary nature of right I.0.8
concluding explanations distinguished I.0.8
interpretation of covered agreements, context (VCLT
31(2)), GATT II:1(b)/GATT II:2(a) B.3.3.21
Schedules of Concessions (GATT II)
“charge equivalent to … imposed
consistently with … Article III” (GATT II(2)(a)) I.0.8,
T.1.1.7-8
ordinary customs duties in excess of those
provided for in Schedule (GATT II:1(b)) T.1.1.5
GATT II:2(a), interrelationship with B.3.3.21,
I.0.8, N.1.1A.1,
T.1.1.5, T.1.1.7-8,
T.1.1A.1
GATT III:2, interrelationship N.1.1A.1,
T.1.1A.1
India — Autos
(WT/DS146/AB/R,
WT/DS175/AB/R)
back to top
third party rights W.2.9.5
AB proceedings (DSU 17.4/WP 24) W.2.9.5
passive participation in oral hearings W.2.9.5
Working Procedures (appellate review) (DSU 17.9),
withdrawal of appeal (AB/WP 30) W.2.13.2.1
India — Patents (US)
(WT/DS50/AB/R)
back to top
burden of proof, correct application of rule B.3.1.5
competence of panels and AB (DSU 3.2/DSU 11),
correct interpretation and application of covered agreements and I.3.1.3
consultations (DSU 4)
due process, disclosure obligation C.7.1,
D.2.2.4
establishment of panel, as prerequisite, panel’s
obligation to address absence of consultations T.6.1.4
due process (dispute settlement proceedings)
disclosure
consultations and C.7.1,
D.2.2.4
fact-finding procedures D.2.2.5
panel proceedings C.7.1,
D.2.2.4, T.6.1.4,
W.3.5
panel working procedures, need for D.2.2.5
panel’s discretion on matters of procedure (DSU
12.1 and Appendix 3) J.2.1.3
information or technical advice, panel’s right
to seek (DSU 13), rectification of failure to meet requirements for establishment of panel and (DSU
6.2) C.7.1
interpretation of covered agreements
applicable law, customary rules of interpretation
of public international law [as codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)]
I.3.1.3, I.3.5.2
legitimate expectations, relevance I.3.5.1-3
specific language, need for I.3.5.2-3
text/plain language I.3.2.3
legitimate expectations and I.3.5.2-3
judicial economy J.1.5
panel’s discretionary power to determine, which
claims must be examined J.1.5
legal basis of claim (DSU 6.2) (request for
establishment of panel) R.2.2.5
arguments distinguished C.1.5,
R.2.2.5
rectification at subsequent stages, fact-finding
by panel C.7.1, T.6.1.4
“matter referred to the DSB” (AD 17.4/DSU
7.1), equivalence of meaning in AD 17.4 and DSU 7.1 T.6.1.4
municipal law
as evidence of
compliance with international/WTO obligations M.5.1
Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia
M.5.1
determination of compliance and interpretation of
legislation distinguished M.5.1
facts M.5.1
state practice M.5.1
not to add to or diminish rights and obligations (DSU
3.2/19.2) I.3.1.3
“specific measure at issue” (AD 17.4/DSU 6.2),
identification as part of the matter referred to the DSB, need for (AD 17.4/DSU 7.1), “specific”,
“included but not necessarily limited to” R.2.2.5,
T.6.2.6
terms of reference of panels (DSU 7), as
definition of jurisdiction / legal claims at issue, legal claim included in terms of reference, limitation
of jurisdiction to J.2.1.3
TRIPS Agreement
existing rights, applicability to (TRIPS 70.2)
obligation to provide means for filing
applications relating to delayed application of TRIPS 27 (TRIPS 70.8) T.9.14.1-2
exclusive marketing rights, requirements (TRIPS
70.9) and T.9.15.1
Working Procedures (panel) (DSU 12.1 and Appendix
3), panel’s discretion, limitations W.3.4
India — Quantitative Restrictions
(WT/DS90/AB/R)
back to top
balance of payments restrictions
GATT XVIII:11, Ad Note
“would thereupon produce”
removal of restrictions and recurrence of one of GATT XVIII:9 conditions, causal
relationship B.1.1.1
temporal sequence B.1.1.2
GATT XVIII:11, Proviso (change in development policy), macroeconomic instruments,
relevance B.1.2.1
GATT XVIII:B
DSU, applicability to disputes relating to J.2.1.4-7
special or additional rule and procedure (DSU Appendix 2), whether J.2.1.4
Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994, footnote 1
as aid to interpretation I.3.10.8
applicability of DSU and J.2.1.5-6
burden of proof B.3.1.9
defences and exceptions B.3.3.5
GATT XVIII:11 and Ad Note B.3.3.5
need to identify where burden lies, whether B.3.1.9
onus probandi actori incumbit as general principle of evidence, defences/exceptions and
B.3.3.5
panel’s right to seek information and advice (DSU 13/SPS 11.2), relevance, expert evidence,
timing of request for B.3.2.5
prima facie case B.3.2.5
competence (AB) (DSU 17.6), classification as issue of law or fact, credibility and weight of
evidence S.3.3.6
DSU, applicability (DSU 1.1), balance of payments restrictions (GATT XVIII:B)
J.2.1.4-7
information or technical advice, panel’s right to seek (DSU 13), expert evidence/experts
(DSU 13.2), timing of request for in relation to establishment of prima facie case
B.3.2.5
International Monetary Fund (IMF) / WTO relationship I.2.3
consultations, requirement for (GATT XV:2), obligation on part of WTO to accept IMF’s
determinations, whether I.2.3
exchange measures outside IMF’s jurisdiction, provision of information on request, panel’s
obligation to make independent assessment I.2.3
panel’s obligation to examine views critically S.7.3.10
interpretation of covered agreements
preparatory work (VCLT 32)
record of negotiations, need for I.3.10.8
Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994, footnote 1
I.3.10.8
supplementary means (VCLT 32) I.3.10.8
nullification or impairment (GATT XXIII), DSU, applicability (DSU 1.1), balance of payments
restrictions (GATT XVIII:B) J.2.1.4-7
standard of review (panels) (DSU 11), evidence, alleged disregard or distortion by panel
(“objective assessment of the facts”), obligation to examine and evaluate evidence
S.7.3.10
|
