ON THIS PAGE:

> India — Autos
> India — Patents
> India — Quantitative Restrictions

India — Autos (WT/DS146/AB/R; WT/DS175/AB/R)     back to top

third party rights W.2.9.5

AB proceedings (WP 24) W.2.9.5

passive participation in oral hearings W.2.9.5

Working Procedures (appellate review), withdrawal of appeal (AB/WP 30) W.2.13.2.1

burden of proof B.3.1.5

panel’s obligation to apply correctly B.3.1.5

competence of panels and AB (DSU 3.2), correct interpretation and application of covered agreements and I.3.1.3

compliance, international obligations M.5.1

consultations (DSU 4)

due process, disclosure obligation C.7.1, D.2.2.4

establishment of panel, as prerequisite, panel’s obligation to address absence of consultations T.6.1.4

due process (dispute settlement proceedings)

disclosure

consultations and C.7.1, D.2.2.4

fact-finding procedures D.2.2.5

panel proceedings C.7.1, D.2.2.4, T.6.1.4, W.3.5

panel working procedures, need for D.2.2.5

panel’s discretion on matters of procedure (DSU 12.1 and Appendix 3) J.2.1.3

information or technical advice, panel’s right to seek (DSU 13), rectification of failure to meet requirements for establishment of panel and (DSU 6.2) C.7.1

interpretation of covered agreements, applicable law, customary rules of interpretation of public international law [as codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)] I.3.1.3, I.3.5.2

interpretation of covered agreements, guidelines

legitimate expectations, relevance I.3.5.1-3

specific language, need for I.3.5.2-3

text/plain language I.3.2.3

legitimate expectations and I.3.5.2-3

judicial economy J.1.5

panel’s discretionary power to determine, which claims must be examined J.1.5

municipal law

as evidence of

compliance with international obligations M.5.1

Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia M.5.1

interpretation of legislation distinguished M.5.1

facts M.5.1

state practice M.5.1

request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2)

identification of specific measure at issue, “included but not necessarily limited to” R.2.2.5, T.6.2.6

legal basis of claim R.2.2.5

arguments distinguished C.1.5, R.2.2.5

rectification at subsequent stages, fact-finding by panel C.7.1, T.6.1.4

terms of reference of panels (DSU 7), as definition of jurisdiction/legal claims at issue, legal claim included in terms of reference, limitation of jurisdiction to J.2.1.3

TRIPS

existing rights, applicability to (TRIPS 70.2)

obligation to provide means for filing applications relating to delayed application of TRIPS 27 (TRIPS 70.8) T.9.14

exclusive marketing rights, requirements (TRIPS 70.9) and T.9.15

Working Procedures (panel) (DSU 12.1 and Appendix 3), panel’s discretion, limitations W.3.4

balance of payments restrictions

GATT XVIII:11, Ad Note

“would thereupon produce”

removal of restrictions and recurrence of one of GATT XVIII:9 conditions, causal relationship B.1.1.1

temporal sequence B.1.1.2

GATT XVIII:11, Proviso (change in development policy), macroeconomic instruments, relevance B.1.2

GATT XVIII:B

DSU, applicability to disputes relating to J.2.1.4-7

special or additional rule and procedure (DSU Appendix 2), whether J.2.1.4

Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994, footnote 1

as aid to interpretation I.3.10.7

applicability of DSU and J.2.1.5-6

burden of proof B.3.1.9

defences and exceptions B.3.3.5

GATT XVIII:11 and Ad Note B.3.3.5

onus probandi actori incumbit as general principle of evidence, defences/exceptions and B.3.3.5

panel’s right to seek information and advice (DSU 13/SPS 11.2), relevance, expert evidence, timing of request for B.3.2.5

prima facie case B.3.2.5

standard of review (DSU 11) and, need to identify where burden lies, whether B.3.1.9

competence (AB), classification as issue of law or fact, credibility and weight of evidence S.3.3.6

DSU, applicability, balance of payments restrictions (GATT XVIII:B) J.2.1.4-7

information or technical advice, panel’s right to seek (DSU 13), expert evidence (DSU 13.2), timing of request for in relation to establishment of prima facie case B.3.2.5

International Monetary Fund (IMF)/WTO relationship I.2.3

consultations, requirement for (GATT XV:2), obligation on part of WTO to accept IMF’s determinations, whether I.2.3

exchange measures outside IMF’s jurisdiction, provision of information on request, panel’s obligation to make independent assessment I.2.3

panel’s obligation to examine views critically S.7.3.10

interpretation of covered agreements, means

preparatory work

record of negotiations, need for I.3.10.7

Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994, footnote 1 I.3.10.7

supplementary means (VC 32) I.3.10.7

nullification or impairment (GATT XXIII), DSU, applicability, balance of payments restrictions (GATT XVIII:B) J.2.1.4-7

standard of review (DSU 11)

burden of proof, need to identify where burden lies, whether B.3.1.9

“objective assessment of the facts”, evidence, alleged disregard or distortion by panel, obligation to examine and evaluate evidence S.7.3.10

The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.