ON THIS PAGE:

> Korea — Alcoholic Beverages
> Korea — Dairy
> Korea — Various Measures on Beef

Korea — Alcoholic Beverages (WT/DS75/AB/R; WT/DS84/AB/R)     back to top

competence (AB), classification as issue of law or fact, credibility and weight of evidence S.3.3.5

directly competitive or substitutable products (GATT III:2) D.1.1-9

criteria

consumer preferences D.1.8, N.1.6

cross-price elasticity D.1.7, N.1.6.5

interchangeability D.1.2, N.1.6.1

determination on case by case basis D.1.8-9, N.1.6.6-7

as dynamic relationship (including possibility of latent demand) D.1.1-2, D.1.4-5, N.1.6.1-3

potential to compete as determining factor N.1.6.1

object and purpose of provision D.1.4, D.1.6, N.1.6.2, N.1.6.4

objective assessment, need for D.1.8-9, N.1.6.7

ordinary meaning D.1.2, N.1.6.1

interpretation of covered agreements, guidelines

narrow/broad interpretation D.1.3

object and purpose D.1.4, D.1.6, N.1.6.2, N.1.6.4

ordinary meaning N.1.6.1

“like product” (GATT III:2)

directly competitive or substitutable products distinguished N.1.5.3

directly competitive or substitutable products distinguished (Ad Note) D.1.3

narrow interpretation, need for D.1.3, N.1.5.3

national treatment, general principle (GATT III:1)

“so as to afford protection”

equality of competitive conditions N.1.6.1, N.1.6.2, N.1.6.4

protection of competitive relationship N.1.6.1, N.1.6.2

panel reports, rationale, need for (DSU 12.7) P.1.1.1

standard of review (DSU 11)

“objective assessment of the facts”

evidence, alleged disregard or distortion by panel S.7.3.6

independence in evaluating S.7.3.6

burden of proof

prima facie case B.3.2.6

examination of respondent’s defence and evidence, timing B.3.2.6

competence (AB)

completion of legal analysis (DSU 17.6) C.4.7-8

factual basis

contentiousness/omission/insufficiency of facts C.4.7-8

limitation to panel’s findings or undisputed facts in panel record C.4.7

consultations (DSU 4), establishment of panel, as prerequisite T.6.1.7

due process (dispute settlement proceedings), prejudice to party, need for T.6.2.7-8

GATT 1947, continuing relevance under WTO G.2.1.3

GATT 1994, WTO Agreement, incorporation into (WTO Annex 1A) G.2.1.3

GATT as integral part of WTO (WTO II:2) G.2.1.3

interpretation of covered agreements, guidelines, effectiveness principle (ut res magis valeat quam pereat/effet utile) I.3.7.7

interpretation of covered agreements, means, context, treaty/treaties as a whole I.3.7.7

proportionality, safeguard measures (SG 5.1) (“to the extent necessary”) and S.1.34.1

request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2)

consultations, indication as to whether held T.6.1.7

identification of specific measure at issue R.2.1.6, T.6.1.7

legal basis of claim R.2.2.6-7

arguments distinguished C.1.6, R.2.2.6-7

due process and T.6.2.7-8

evidence to support claim distinguished C.1.6

summary, sufficiency R.2.1.6, T.6.1.7

listing of paragraphs of agreement allegedly breached R.2.2.6-7, T.6.2.7-8

writing R.2.1.6, T.6.1.7

safeguard measures, characteristics

exceptional nature of remedy S.1.45.1

relationship between Safeguards Agreement and GATT XIX S.1.44.3-4

continuing applicability of GATT XIX S.1.44.3-4

SPS Agreement,

risk assessment, need for (SPS 5.1-5.3 and Annex A, para. 4), “sufficient scientific evidence” requirement (SPS 2.2) and S.6.14.5

WTO Agreement, Safeguards Agreement as integral part of (WTO II:2) G.2.1.3, S.1.44.3-4

safeguard measures, conditions (SG 2)

“such increased quantities”

“as a result of unforeseen developments” (GATT XIX:1(a)) S.1.50.2

as pertinent issue of fact and law S.1.50.2

safeguard measures, determination of serious injury or threat thereof (SG 4), requirements, evaluation of all relevant factors (SG 4.2(a)), inclusion of all listed factors in notification to Committee on Safeguards (SG 12.2) S.1.41.2

safeguard measures, notification and consultation (SG 12)

adequate opportunity for prior consultations (SG 12.3), meaningful exchange, need for S.1.41.1

of all pertinent information (SG 12.2) S.1.41.1-2

all factors listed in SG 12.2 and 4.2(a), need for S.1.41.2

date of introduction of measure S.1.41.1

precise description of proposed measure S.1.41.1

safeguard measures (Safeguards Agreement (SG/GATT XIX (emergency action))), application of measures (SG 5), proportionality (“to the extent necessary”) (SG 5.1) S.1.34.1

standard of review (DSU 11), “objective assessment of the facts”, evidence, alleged disregard or distortion by panel, obligation to examine and evaluate evidence S.7.3.11

WTO Agreement, integral parts (WTO II) G.2.1.3, I.3.7.7

Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) (AG 1(a)/Annex 3)

Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) (AG 1(a)/Annex 3), Current Total AMS A.1.2.2

Base Total AMS/commitment levels (AG 1(a)/Annex 3), absolute nature A.1.1.1

“constituent data and methodology”, beef, absence A.1.2.2

market price support (AG Annex 3, paragraph 8), “production eligible” A.1.35.1

“provisions of Annex 3” / “constituent data and methodology” (AG 1(a)(ii)), priority A.1.2.2

Agreement on Agriculture (AG), Schedules of Commitments (AG 3) [and AG Annex 3] R.2.2.11

beef, AMS calculation, “constituent data and methodology”, absence A.1.2.2

General Exceptions (GATT XX)

alternative WTO-consistent measure, availability, enforcement of WTO-consistent law and G.3.5.1

measures necessary to secure compliance with GATT-consistent measure (GATT XX(d))

alternative WTO-consistent measure, availability and G.3.5.1

“necessary”, relevant factors G.3.6

contribution to realization of end pursued G.3.6.3-4

importance of common interests protected by implementing measure G.3.6.2, G.3.6.4

restrictive effect on international commerce/imported goods G.3.6.3-4

interpretation of covered agreements, guidelines, ordinary meaning A.1.2.1

interpretation of covered agreements, specific terms and phrases, “in accordance with”, AG 1(a)(ii) A.1.2.1

national treatment, general principle (GATT III:1), “so as to afford protection”, equality of competitive conditions N.1.11.3-4

national treatment, regulatory discrimination (GATT III:4)

“less favourable treatment” N.1.11.3-6

equality of competitive conditions as test N.1.11.3-4

formal differentiation in treatment, relevance N.1.11.3-5

market effect as test N.1.11.5-6

request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2)

legal basis of claim R.2.2.11

summary, sufficiency, reference to AG 3 and 6 as incorporating Schedule of Commitments and AG Annex 3 R.2.2.11, T.6.2.11

The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.