../../../175pxls.gif (78 bytes)

 

home > trade topics > dispute settlement > appellate body > repertory > index c-d


SUBJECT INDEX BY CASE: ARBITRATION AWARDS UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(c) OF THE DSU

C-D

 

Index:  A-B  C-D  E-H  I  J  K-T  U-Z


ON THIS PAGE:

Canada — Autos
Canada — Patent Term
> Canada — Pharmaceutical Patents
> Chile — Alcoholic Beverages
> Chile — Price Band System 


Canada — Autos (WT/DS139/12; WT/DS142/12)     back to top

implementation of recommendations and rulings of the DSB (DSU 21.3)

impracticality of immediate compliance/reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

“particular circumstances” ARB. 5.1.7

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB. 5.1.7

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 4.2.6

prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB. 2.5

discretion and ARB. 2.5

 
Canada — Patent Term (WT/DS170/10)     back to top

implementation of recommendations and rulings of the DSB (DSU 21.3)

impracticality of immediate compliance/reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

contentiousness, relevance ARB. 5.5.5-7

economic harm likely to accrue to nationals of other Members, relevance ARB. 5.9.1

flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB. 5.12.2

“particular circumstances” ARB. 5.1.9

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB. 5.1.9

TRIPS, patents, term of protection (TRIPS 33), economic consequences of termination of non-WTO consistent measure, relevance ARB. 5.9.1


Canada — Pharmaceutical Patents (WT/DS114/13)     back to top

burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB. 5.6.4, ARB. 6.2-3

implementation of recommendations and rulings of the DSB (DSU 21.3)

consistency with WTO obligations, responsibility for determining ARB. 1.4-8

impracticality of immediate compliance/reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB. 4.1.1-2

“reasonable period”

administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB. 5.6.3

burden of proof ARB. 5.6.4, ARB. 6.2-3

complexity of implementing measures ARB. 5.3.2, ARB. 5.5.2

contentiousness, relevance ARB. 5.5.2-3

“particular circumstances” ARB. 5.1.5-6

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB. 4.3.4, ARB. 5.1.5-6

structural adjustment, relevance of need for ARB. 5.7.2

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 4.2.5

mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 1.4-8


Chile — Alcoholic Beverages (WT/DS87/15; WT/DS110/14)     back to top

implementation of recommendations and rulings of the DSB (DSU 21.3)

impracticality of immediate compliance/reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)

“reasonable period”

contentiousness, relevance ARB. 5.5.1

developing countries and (DSU 21.2) ARB. 5.10.2-3

“particular circumstances” ARB. 5.1.4

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB. 4.3.3

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 4.2.4

prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB. 2.4


Chile — Price Band System (WT/DS207/13)     back to top

appellate review (DSU 17), AB reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 17.14), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 5.2.2

compliance, WTO obligations, good faith/pacta sunt servanda principle ARB. 5.4.9

good faith (including pacta sunt servanda principle (VC 26)), compliance with WTO obligations ARB. 5.4.9

implementation of recommendations and rulings of the DSB (DSU 21.3)

good faith obligation ARB. 5.4.9

impracticality of immediate compliance/reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB. 2.8

“reasonable period”

administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB. 5.5.9

complexity of implementation process ARB. 5.4.6-9, ARB. 5.6.6-8

contentiousness, relevance ARB. 5.5.9

developing countries and (DSU 21.2) ARB. 5.10.4

“particular circumstances” ARB. 5.1.10

shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB. 4.3.6-7, ARB. 5.1.10

“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 4.2.8

prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB. 2.8

actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB. 5.2.2

panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 5.2.2

 


The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.

 
   
 

contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland