|
|
|
|
|
| home > trade topics > dispute settlement > appellate body > repertory > index n |
|
SUBJECT INDEX N
Index: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X, Y, Z |
|
The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva. |
national treatment, exceptions (GATT III:8), expenditure of
revenue by government, limitation to (GATT III:8(b)) S.2.42.1 national treatment, general principle (GATT III:1) interpretation of GATT III as a whole and effectiveness principle N.1.1.2 GATT III:1 as context N.1.1.2-4, N.1.9.2.1-3 GATT III:4 (“like” product) and N.1.1.4, N.1.9.2 “so as to afford protection”: see also national treatment, regulatory discrimination (GATT III:4), “so as to afford protection”; national treatment, tax discrimination (GATT III:2), “so as to afford protection” equality of competitive conditions N.1.1.1, N.1.1.2, N.1.6.1, N.1.6.2, N.1.6.4, N.1.9.2.3, N.1.11.3-4 protection of competitive relationship N.1.1.1, N.1.1.2, N.1.6.1, N.1.6.2, N.3.1 GATS II and XVII distinguished N.1.13.1 “less favourable treatment” and N.1.11.7-8 omission from GATT III:2, first sentence, relevance
N.1.1.3, N.1.11.2 national treatment, regulatory discrimination (GATT III:4): see also “like product” (GATT III:4) GATS I:1 compared N.1.10.2 general principle (GATT III:1) and N.1.1.4, N.1.9.2 “less favourable treatment” N.1.11 detriment, need for N.1.11.10 differentiation on the face of the statute N.1.14.2-6 equality of competitive conditions as test N.1.11.3-4 formal differentiation in treatment, relevance N.1.11.3-5, N.1.14.2 market effect as test N.1.11.5-6 TRIPS 3.1 compared N.1.14.1 “so as to afford protection” equality of competitive conditions N.1.9.2.3 “less favourable treatment” and N.1.11.7-8 tax discrimination (GATT III:2) provisions distinguished
N.1.3.1.4, N.1.9.1.1,
N.1.9.2.1-2, N.1.9.3.1 national treatment, services and service suppliers (GATS XVII),
determination of violation, requirements, aims and effects test, GATT
III:1 distinguished M.2.2.2, N.1.13.1 national treatment, tax discrimination (GATT III:2): see also directly competitive or substitutable products (GATT III:2); “like product” (GATT III:2) determination of violation, requirements inconsistency of measure with GATT III:1 principles (including non-like products) N.1.2.2 “like product” status N.1.2.2 determination on case by case basis N.1.3.1.1-2 tax of imported product in excess of domestic product N.1.2.2 “in excess of” N.1.4 “directly or indirectly” imported products N.1.2.1 like domestic products N.1.2.1 Members’ right to determine basis of taxation subject to compliance with WTO obligations T.3.1-4 “not similarly taxed” N.1.7 assessment of differential N.1.7.5-6 determination on case by case basis N.1.7.2 “in excess of” distinguished N.1.7.1 threshold/de minimis differential N.1.7.2-3, N.3.1 “so as to afford protection” N.1.1.3, N.1.11.2 design and structure of measure as evidence of protective application N.1.8.2 intention, relevance M.2.2.2, N.1.8.1, N.1.13.1 magnitude of differential as evidence of protective effect
N.1.8.3 national treatment (TRIPS 3) applicability (TRIPS 3.1, Footnote 3) N.1.14.1 as fundamental principle N.1.14.1 “less favourable treatment” N.1.14.1 differentiation on the face of the statute N.1.14.2-6 formal differentiation in treatment, relevance N.1.14.2 GATT III:4 compared N.1.14.1 with regard to the protection of trade-related property rights
N.1.14.1 “necessary”: see countervailing duties (SCM, Part V),
“to the extent necessary” (SCM 21.1); customs unions and free trade
areas (GATT XXIV), as exception to GATT provisions (GATT XXIV:5,
chapeau), requirements, necessity of measure to establishment of customs
union; General Exceptions (GATT XX), measures necessary to protect
human, animal or plant life or health (GATT XX(b)); General Exceptions
(GATT XX), measures necessary to secure compliance with GATT-consistent
measure (GATT XX(d)), “necessary”, relevant factors;
proportionality, safeguard measures (SG 5.1) (“to the extent necessary”)
and; safeguard measures (Safeguards Agreement (SG/GATT XIX (emergency
action))), application of measures (SG 5), proportionality (“to the
extent necessary”) (SG 5.1) NGOs, amicus curiae briefs: see amicus curiae
briefs, NGO/private individual briefs non-discriminatory administration of quantitative restrictions (GATT XIII) T.2: see also market access concessions and commitments (AG 4.1), consistency with GATT XIII allocation to Members having a substantial interest (GATT XIII:2(d)) T.2.5 allocation to Members not having a substantial interest (GATT XIII:1) T.2.1 compensation negotiated under GATT XXVIII and T.2.6 distribution of trade as close as possible to expected shares in absence of restrictions as aim (GATT XIII:2, chapeau) T.2.2, T.2.7 publication and administration of trade regulations (GATT X:3(a)) P.5.3, T.2.4 standard of proof P.5.3.2 regulatory regimes established by Member, relevance
T.2.3 non-retroactivity of treaties (VC 28) P.3.4, T.5.1.1-2 continuing measures P.3.4.2-3, T.5.2.1 as general principle of international law P.3.4.1-2 pre-existing rights countervailing duties (SCM 32.3) S.2.41.2 TBT Agreement T.5.3.1-2 non-violation claims (GATT XXIII:1(b)): see also nullification or impairment (GATT XXIII) “any measure” N.2.2.1 de minimis effects, relevance N.3.1 as exceptional remedy N.2.1.1 measure in “conflict” with GATT provisions, applicability to N.2.2.1 concurrent application to measures falling under other provisions of
GATT N.2.2.1 notice of appeal, requirements (AB/WP 20(2)) amendment W.2.7.4: see also Working Procedures (appellate review), withdrawal of appeal (AB/WP 30) objection to panel’s jurisdiction J.2.1.15, O.1.8, T.6.1.11, W.2.7.1.3 right to defend interests and S.7.2A.1, W.2.7.1.1-2, W.2.7.4.1-2, W.2.7.5.5 statement of allegations of errors on issues of law/legal interpretations (AB/WP 20(2)(d)) I.1.6, W.2.6.9-10, W.2.7.1.1-2, W.2.7.3 allegation of panel’s failure to make objective assessment (DSU 11), need for specific reference S.3.2, S.7.2A.1, W.2.7.5 explanation for allegation of error I.1.6 identification of facts requiring panel to draw inferences I.1.6, W.2.7.2.1 illustrative list, sufficiency W.2.7.3.3 indication of appropriate factual or legal inferences I.1.6, W.2.7.2.1 legal argument in support of claim distinguished C.1.8, R.2.2.8, S.3.2.1, W.2.7.2.1-2 summary of contested conclusion and related findings and
interpretations W.2.7.3.4 nullification or impairment (DSU 3.8) adverse impact as N.3.2-3 presumption in case of inconsistency with covered agreement
N.3.2-3 nullification or impairment (GATT XXIII): see also non-violation claims (GATT XXIII:1(b)) DSU, applicability, balance of payments restrictions (GATT XVIII:B) J.2.1.4-7
|
|
contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland