|
|
|
| ON THIS PAGE General Pharmaceuticals and agricultural chemicals |
| home > trade topics > trips > pharma fact sheet > developing countries |
| FACT
SHEET: TRIPS AND PHARMACEUTICAL PATENTS Developing countries transition periods Provisions for developing countries, economies in transition from central planning, and least-developed countries |
|
September 2006 Contents > Philosophy: striking a balance > Obligations and exceptions > What does generic mean? > Developing countries This fact sheet has been prepared by the Information and Media Relations Division of the WTO Secretariat to help public understanding. It is not an official interpretation of the WTO agreements or members positions |
GENERAL back to top Developing countries and economies in transition from central planning did not have to apply most provisions of the TRIPS Agreement until 1 January 2000. The provisions they did have to apply deal with non-discrimination. Article 65.2 and 65.3 Least-developed
countries were given until 1 January 2006. Article 66.1. On 30 November 2005, members agreed to extend the deadline to 1 July 2013, or
to the date a country is no longer “least-developed”, if that is
earlier. Most new members who joined after the WTO was created in 1995 have agreed to apply the TRIPS Agreement as soon as they joined. Determined by each new members terms of accession PHARMACEUTICALS AND AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS back to top Some developing countries delayed patent protection for pharmaceutical products (and agricultural chemicals) until 1 January 2005. This was allowed under provisions that say a developing country that did not provide product patent protection in a particular area of technology when the TRIPS Agreement came into force (on 1 January 1995), has up to 10 years to introduce the protection. Article 65.4 However, for pharmaceuticals and agricultural chemicals, countries eligible to use this provision (i.e. countries that did not provide protection on 1 January 1995) had two obligations. They had to allow inventors to file patent applications from 1 January 1995, even though the decision on whether or not to grant any patent itself need not be taken until the end of this period Article 70.8. This is sometimes called the mailbox provision (a metaphorical mailbox is created to receive and store the applications). The date of filing is significant, which is why the mailbox provisions were set up. It is used for assessing whether the application meets the criteria for patenting, including novelty (newness). And if the government allowed the relevant pharmaceutical or agricultural chemical product to be marketed during the transition period, it had to subject to certain conditions provide the patent applicant an exclusive marketing right for the product for five years, or until a decision on a product patent was taken, whichever was shorter. Article 70.9 Which countries used the extra transition period under Article 65.4, wholly or partially? The answer is not entirely straightforward. Thirteen WTO members — Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Egypt, India, Kuwait, Morocco, Pakistan, Paraguay, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and Uruguay — notified “mailbox” systems to the TRIPS Council, indicating that at the time they did not grant patent protection to pharmaceutical products. It is possible that a few other members should have notified the WTO but did not do so. |
|
contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland