REFERENCE:

Negotiating Group on MTN 1 June 1990

Agreements and Arrangements

 

 

 

AGREEMENT ON IMPORT LICENSING PROCEDURES

Note by the Secretariat

 

At the meeting of the Negotiating Group held on 31 January- 2 February 1990, an informal group, open to all interested countries, was established with the task of clarifying and exchanging views on the proposals under consideration (MTN.GNG/NG8/15, item B). This group held its initial meeting on 28 February 1990.

In pursuance of the Decision of the NG8 at its meeting on 21-22 March 1990 (MTN.GNG/NG8/16, para. 14) and following the second meeting of the informal group on 4 May 1990, attached hereto is an informal side-by-side text produced by the secretariat. It gives the status of work

prior to the next informal meeting to be held on 11 June 1990.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technical Barriers to Trade Division

 

 

Let/1673

1 June 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing

Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS*

STATES AND HONG KONG

Preamble Preamble Preamble

Having regard to the No change. No comments.

Multilateral Trade

Negotiations, the Parties to

this Agreement on Import

Licensing Procedures

(hereinafter referred to as

"Parties" and "this

Agreement");

Desiring to further the No change. One delegation suggested to

objectives of the General include a reference to the

Agreement on Tariffs and recognition and reaffirmation

Trade (hereinafter referred of the GATT principles here

to as "General Agreement" or rather than mention Article XI

"GATT"); below.

Taking into account the No change. No comments.

particular trade, development

and financial needs of

developing countries;

 

_______________

*This column summarizes main comments made, as, in the Secretariat's judgement, they seem to appear after the meetings of the Informal Group on 28 February and 4 May 1990. Earlier comments on the revised proposal (NG8/W/53/Rev.1), made at the November 1989 meeting, are summarized in MTN.GNG/NG8/14, paragraphs 57-75. Apart from particular comments on individual proposed provisions the point has been made that the whole text has to be considered in a comprehensive and balanced manner.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Recognizing the usefulness of No change. No comments.

automatic import licensing for

certain purposes and that such

licensing should not be used to

restrict trade;

Desiring to ensure that import Some delegations suggested the

licensing is not utilized in a deletion of this provision

manner contrary to GATT because it was not the purpose

principles and obligations; of the Code to ensure

consistency with substantive GATT principles and obligations. Some delegations believed that, in this paragraph and the next, since dealing with a procedural Code, the word "procedures" should be inserted after "import licensing". Some other delegations warned against devoting too much time to this issue since it was difficult to distinguish what was procedure and what was substance; moreover, the Code already contained substantive provisions.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Recognizing that import Recognizing and reaffirming the One comment was to delete this

licensing may be employed to provisions of Article XI of the reference because Article XI

administer measures such as General Agreement as they was not the only GATT Article

those adopted pursuant to the apply to import licensing; which might be relevant. It

relevant provisions of the was also suggested to delete

GATT; the reference to Art. XI since

this was a provision of

substance. One suggestion was

to add the word "procedures"

at the end. The sponsors

argued that Article XI was the

principle GATT provision that

gave rise to licensing

procedures; other Articles built on Article XI or provided exceptions to the prohibition it contained. However, they were open to discuss inclusion of other Articles and of other language.

Recognizing also that the Recognizing that the Two delegations believed the

inappropriate use of import inappropriate or excessive word "excessive" did not add

licensing procedures may use of import licensing to clarity or to the operational

impede the flow of procedures constitutes a nature of the Code and would be

international trade; particular impediment to difficult to measure. One

the flow of international trade; delegation suggested inserting

the words "could constitute

further" instead of

"constitutes a particular

impediment" to show there was

an element of doubt.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Convinced that import No comments.

licensing, particularly

non-automatic import

licensing, should be

implemented in a transparent

and predictable manner;

Recognizing that non-automatic No comments.

licensing procedures should be

no more administratively

burdensome than absolutely

necessary to administer the

relevant measure;

Desiring to simplify, and bring No change. No comments.

transparency to, the

administrative procedures and

practices used in international

trade, and to ensure the fair

and equitable application and

administration of such

procedures and practices;

Desiring to provide for a No change. No comments.

consultative mechanism and the

speedy, effective and equitable

resolution of disputes arising

under this Agreement;

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Hereby agree as follows: In a general comment, one

delegation said that what was

added in the Preamble was in

line with the purpose and scope

of the Code. It was therefore

prepared to amend the Code in

all regards which were in line

with the Preamble.

Article 1: General Provisions Article 1: General Provisions Article 1: General Provisions

Article 1.1

For the purpose of this No change. No comments.

Agreement, import licensing is

defined as administrative

procedures1 used for the

operation of import licensing

regimes requiring the

submission of an application

or other documentation (other

than that required for customs

purposes) to the relevant

administrative body as a prior

condition for importation into

the customs territory of the

importing country.

 

_______________

1Those procedures referred to as "licensing" as well as other similar administrative

procedures.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

 

Article 1.2

The Parties shall ensure that No change. No comments.

the administrative procedures

used to implement import

licensing regimes are in

conformity with the relevant

provisions of the GATT

including its annexes and

protocols, as interpreted by

this Agreement, with a view to

preventing trade distortions

that may arise from an

inappropriate operation of

those procedures, taking into

account the economic

development purposes and

financial and trade needs of

developing countries.

Article 1.3

The rules for import licensing No change. No comments.

procedures shall be neutral in

application and administered in

a fair and equitable manner.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 1.4 Article 1.4 (Based on Article 1.4

Committee Recommendation)

The rules and all information The rules and all information Some delegations have noted

concerning procedures for the concerning procedures for the that they did not have specific

submission of applications, submission of applications, opening dates for the

including the eligibility of including the eligibility of submission of applications. One

persons, firms and institutions persons, firms, and delegation, using a tender

to make such applications, and institutions to make such system, said that the word

the lists of products subject to applications, and the lists of "consideration" instead of

the licensing requirement shall products subject to the "submission" would meet this

be published promptly in such a licensing requirement shall be point. Another delegation has

manner as to enable published in the sources argued that time limits might

governments and traders to notified to the create impediments to trading

become acquainted with them. secretariat at least and that the 21 day period had

Any changes in either the rules twenty-one days prior to to do with a quota system,

concerning licensing the specific opening date which its authorities did not

procedures or the list of for the submission of follow. One delegation said

products subject to import applications, and in such a that Article 1.4 should be made

licensing shall also be promptly manner as to enable more generic and applicable to

published in the same manner. governments and traders to all systems. The drafters

Copies of these publications become acquainted with them. agreed.

shall also be made available to Any changes in either the rules

the GATT Secretariat. concerning licensing Recommendation adopted by the

procedures or the list of Committee on Import Licensing

products subject to import Procedures on 19 May 1987:

licensing shall be published in "The rules and all information

the same manner, at least concerning procedures for the

twenty-one days before submission of applications

the effective date of the referred to in Article 1.4 and

change. the lists of products subject to

the licensing requirement, as

well as any changes in either

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

the rules or the lists of products should, where there is a specific opening date for the submission of applications, normally be published at least 21 days prior to that date." "The elements of information referred to in Article 3(c) should also be published in such a manner as to enable governments and traders to become acquainted with them."

During this twenty-one-day One delegation, supported by

period, Parties shall be another, said that the political

provided the opportunity to and administrative system in

make comments in writing and its country did not permit

to discuss these comments consultations with other

upon request. The concerned governments before making

Party shall give due changes in policies or

consideration to these procedures. Hence, an

comments and results of obligatory opportunity for

discussions. making comments in writing

and discuss upon request was not acceptable. Two delegations were concerned that this paragraph might make the licensing authorities' job administratively complex. One of these proposed the following language: "During this twenty-

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

one-day period, Parties shall be provided the opportunity to make comments in writing and to discuss these comments upon request, if either the rules concerning licensing procedures or the list of products subject to import licensing, changes in these rules or list may have a significant effect on trade of these Parties. The concerned Party shall etc. . ." In reply to a question it said that "significant effect" would be assessed by the administrative authority. The sponsors replied that the time limit proposed was based on a Committee Recommendation but that perhaps "twenty-one-day period" could be replaced by the notion of expeditiousness. Another delegation tentatively agreed with this idea. The sponsors have also stressed that the intention is to provide for a best-endeavour clause.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

 

Notwithstanding the above, if Two delegations have

situations arise which make it expressed concern that the

absolutely necessary to word "situations" might permit

provide for an early opening systematic use of this

date for the submission of paragraph. Although there was

licensing applications, the a Committee Recommendation

information referred to in (see Recommendation in Article

sub-paragraph 1 shall be 3.5(e)), this paragraph might

published and notified to the have to be re-evaluated. The

GATT secretariat immediately sponsors have replied that the

and in no case later than seven Committee Recommendation

days after the announcement of had been carefully reflected

the quota or other measure upon. This paragraph was a

involving an import licensing response to concerns voiced

requirement. earlier on the time-frame;

case by case exceptions were envisioned, not systematic

exceptions. 1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 1.5 Article 1.5 Article 1.5

Application forms and, where No change. No comments.

applicable, renewal forms shall

be as simple as possible. Such

documents and information as

are considered strictly

necessary for the proper

functioning of the licensing

régime may be required on

application,

Article 1.6 Article 1.6 (Based on Article 1.6

Committee Recommendation)

Application procedures and, Application procedures and, Committee Recommendation of

where applicable, renewal where applicable, renewal 19 May 1987; "When there is

procedures shall be as simple procedures shall be as simple a closing date for the

as possible. Applicants shall as possible. Where there is submission of licensing

have to approach only one a closing date for the applications, applicants should

administrative body previously submission of licensing be allowed at least 21 days for

specified in the rules referred applications, applicants making such submissions.

to in paragraph 4 above in should be allowed at least However, this provision should

connection with an application twenty-one days for not be interpreted as

and shall be allowed a making such submissions. derogating from Article 3(a),

reasonable period therefor. In However, this provision particularly in cases where

cases where it is strictly should not be interpreted insufficient amounts of

indispensable that more than as derogating from applications have been received

one administrative body is to Article 3(5)(a), within the 21 days."

be approached in connection particularly in cases

with an application, these shall where insufficient One delegation visualized

be kept to the minimum number amounts of applications possible misuse as there could

possible. have been received within be a great rush for applications

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

this stipulated period. with such advance notices of

Applicants shall have to closing dates. The sponsors

approach only one replied that unlike Art.1.4

administrative body previously which dealt with notification in

specified in the rules referred advance, this proposal dealt

to in paragraph 1 of with how much time should be

Article 1.4 above in allowed for submission of

connection with an application applications. Stating 21 days

and shall be allowed a would give predictability to

reasonable period therefor. traders who would not have to

rush to get applications in.

Questions were also raised

regarding the intention of the

cross reference to Article

3(5)(a).

In cases where it is strictly Committee Recommendation of

indispensable that more than 19 May 1987: "In cases

one administrative body is to where it is strictly

be approached in connection indispensable that more than

with an application, one administrative body is to

applicants shall not need be approached in connection

to approach more than with an application, applicants

two administrative should not need to approach

bodies. more than two administrative

bodies."

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

One delegation stated that a maximum of two bodies did not seem justified as long as the norm of one administrative body had been fixed. Due to administrative complexities, import of certain items might need the clearance of more than two bodies and no limit should be set. The sponsors replied that it was essential to have limits on bodies to assist exporters. While agreeing on this, one delegation suggested perhaps to introduce the words "concerned party will ensure" so that the responsibility was clearly on the government. The point was made that a government could have as many bodies as it wished but the applicant should only have to go to two at the most. One delegation, sharing the objective of avoiding undue trade hindrances, noted that in a federal system, more than two bodies might be needed and that it would have to consider how to avoid unintended consequences if a limitation were placed in the Code.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 1.7 Article 1.7 Article 1.7

No application shall be refused No change. No comments.

for minor documentation

errors which do not alter basic

data contained therein. No

penalty greater than necessary

to serve merely as a warning

shall be imposed in respect of

any omission or mistake in

documentation or procedures

which is obviously made

without fraudulent intent or

gross negligence.

Article 1.8 Article 1.8 Article 1.8

Licensed imports shall not be No change. No comments.

refused for minor variations in

value, quantity or weight from

the amount designated on the

licence due to differences

occurring during shipment,

differences incidental to bulk

loading and other minor

differences consistent with

normal commercial practice.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 1.9 Article 1.9 Article 1.9

The foreign exchange No change. No comments.

necessary to pay for licensed

imports shall be made available

to licence holders on the same

basis as to importers of goods

not requiring import licences.

Article 1.10 Article 1.10 Article 1.10

With regard to security No change. No comments.

exceptions, the provisions of

Article XXI of the GATT apply.

Article 1.11 Article 1.11 Article 1.11

The provisions of this No change. No comments.

Agreement shall not require

any Party to disclose

confidential information which

would impede law enforcement

or otherwise be contrary to

the public interest or would

prejudice the legitimate

commercial interests of

particular enterprises, public

or private.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 2: Automatic import Article 2: Automatic import Article 2: Automatic import

licensing2 licensing licensing

Article 2.1 Revised Article 2.1 Revised Article 2.1

Automatic import licensing is Automatic import licensing is One delegation considered that

defined as import licensing defined as import licensing the amendments proposed

where approval of the where approval of the originally might lead to

application is freely granted. application is freely granted in confusion and that it was

all cases in accordance with superfluous to refer to the

the requirements of Article legal consequences found in

2.2. particularly within the Art. 2.2 in this definition of the

time limits established in automatic licence itself. The

Article 2.2(e), sponsors replied that their

main concern was about Art.

2.2(e), stated that they would

be amenable to the following:

"where, in all cases,

approval of the application is

freely granted within a

maximum of [7] [10]

working days".

One delegation noted that "licensing" made it unclear whether it was a question of any particular licence which was freely granted, or a licensing system which provided for freely granted applications.

_______________

2Those import licensing procedures requiring a security which have no restrictive effects on imports, are to be considered as falling within the scope of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 2 below.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 2.2 Article 2.2 Article 2.2

The following provisions,3 in No change. No comments.

addition to those in paragraphs

1 to 11 of Article 1 and

paragraph 1 of Article 2

above, shall apply to automatic

import licensing procedures:

(a) Automatic licensing No change. No comments.

procedures shall not be

administered in a manner so as

to have restricting effects on

imports subject to automatic

licensing;

(b) Parties recognize that (b) Parties recognize that

automatic import licensing may automatic import licensing may

be necessary whenever other be necessary whenever other

appropriate procedures are not appropriate procedures are not

available. Automatic import available. Automatic import

licensing may be maintained as licensing may be maintained as

long as the circumstances long as the circumstances

which gave rise to its which gave rise to its

introduction prevail or as long introduction prevail and as

as its underlying long as its underlying

administrative purposes cannot administrative purposes cannot

be achieved in a more be achieved in a more

appropriate way; appropriate way;

_______________

3A developing country Party, which has specific difficulties with the requirements of sub-

paragraphs (d) and (e) below may, upon notification to the Committee referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 4, delay the application of these sub-paragraphs by not more than two years from the date of entry into force of this Agreement for such Party.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

(c) Any person, firm or No change. No comments.

institution which fulfils the

legal requirements of the

importing country for engaging

in import operations involving

products subject to automatic

licensing shall be equally

eligible to apply for and to

obtain import licences;

d) Applications for licences No change. No comments.

may be submitted on any

working day prior to the

customs clearance of the

goods;

(e) Applications for licences No change. One delegation suggested

when submitted in appropriate setting the limit at seven days.

and complete form shall be

approved immediately on

receipt, to the extent

administratively feasible, but

within a maximum of ten

working days.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 3: Non-automatic Article 3: Non-automatic Article 3: Non-automatic

import licensing import licensing import licensing

New Article 3.1 New Article 3.1

The following provisions, in Non-automatic import licensing One delegation believed that

addition to those in paragraphs is defined as import licensing this paragraph should make

1 to 11 of Article 1 above, not falling within the definition reference to Art. 2.1

shall apply to non-automatic contained in Article 2 above. specifically, not Art. 2 in

import licensing procedures, general. The sponsors replied

that is, import licensing that Art. 2 was referred to

procedures not falling under here because of the cross-

paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 2 reference to Art. 2.2 in Art.

above: 2.1. They were open to

tightening the definition of Art.2.1 so it could stand on its own, and be only referred to in Art. 3.1.

New Article 3.2 New Article 3.2

Non-automatic licensing The sponsors referred to this

procedures shall correspond in proposal as modest, stipulating

scope and duration to the nothing more nor less than that

measure they are used to an import licensing procedure

implement, and shall be no should not extend beyond the

more administratively measure it implemented. They

burdensome than absolutely have agreed with a comment by

necessary to administer the one delegation that Art.3.2

measure. should follow Art. 3.5(a)

without separation. One delegation has suggested the deletion of the word "absolutely"

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

New Article 3.3 New Article 3.3

Given that certain types of One delegation believed this

non-automatic licensing, was preambular rather than

including licensing used to operative language; it was not

administer small quotas which precise enough to show what

fluctuate in size, or general kind of licences the drafters

prohibitions to which had in mind. The sponsors

exceptions are granted, have noted that a core concern

the potential for being behind this proposal was the

particularly trade distortive, fact that the provisions on

Parties shall take particular licensing requirements used to

care to implement such implement QR's were not

licensing requirements in a parallelled in provisions for transparent and predictable licensing to implement other

manner. measures. In the case of

licensing requirements for purposes other than the implementation of QR's,

Parties should publish

sufficient information for other Parties and traders to know the basis for granting and/or allocating licences. The aim was primarily to increase transparency in this area. They were ready to consider a reformulation. (The sponsors have also said that this was an attempt to describe discretionary licensing: those cases

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

where government imposes a small quota which varies unpredictably and not transparently. One delegation has also said that it did not believe discretionary licensing fitted into the non-automatic category and another delegation has said that the best way to reduce discretionary licensing was not to have such an exception provided for in the rules. Discretionary licensing was more a matter of the underlying measure. It has also been suggested to create a third category of other, miscellaneous licences.)

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

New Article 3.4 New Article 3.4

To the extent that exceptions One delegation wondered what

may be granted to licensing exceptions the drafters had in

requirements, such exceptions mind. If what was meant was a

shall be granted in a manner special provision for

that is fair and equitable to all exceptions to the rule, this

traders. Parties shall publish might implicitly recognize

the criteria and/or them. Exceptions to a rule was

circumstances under which part of the rule and should be

exceptions may be granted. dealt with in Article 1.4. The

Notice of any exceptions proposed new Article 3.4 was

granted shall be published as therefore superfluous. The

soon as possible to allow drafters noted that

sufficient time for "exceptions" would cover both

governments and traders to exceptions from a licensing

become familiar with them. In requirement per se and

exceptional circumstances exceptions to any requirement

when prior publication is not in the procedure for obtaining a

possible, Parties shall publish licence. The problem was that

and notify exceptions within governments sometimes

fourteen days of granting them. treated exceptions as

Notifications shall include an something that need not be

explanation as to why prior provided for in the rules but

publication was not possible. could be dealt with on an ad hoc

basis as the need arose. It was important to increase transparency through prior publication of the criteria and conditions under which exceptions might be granted. This meant that governments

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

had to examine their regimes and identify the circumstances for which, at least in the past, they had granted exceptions. However, the intention was not to stipulate rules in the Code which would restrict the ability of a government to grant exceptions. The point was that if exceptions were granted this should be done in a fair, equitable, nondiscriminatory and transparent way. The other delegation maintained that if identification of circumstances and criteria was a question of the objective conditions that had to be fulfilled in order to grant an exception, this was part of the rule and belonged to Article 1.4.

 

In the discussion of an example it was said that extension of the validity of a licence was not an exception but a part of the rule. The drafters explained that if such an extension was dealt with by some exceptional procedure not

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

covered by regulations, it would be covered under this proposal.

The point was made that the need to respect commercial confidentiality should be taken care of in the drafting as well as the fact that a number of circumstances would arise that could never be foreseen.

Another delegation shared this view, adding that trying to identify rules to deal with exceptions was too ambitious. Concerning "fair and equitable" in the first sentence, one should presume that governments would adhere to their obligations and, thus, not resort to deviations unless for really exceptional reasons.

One delegation expressed no preference for any of the approaches suggested. The problems had to be dealt with however. Possibly the clarification of the intention of this provision could be referred to the Preamble or to a footnote.

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

 

The question of national security implications of a publication requirement has also been raised. The drafters have said that national security exceptions are taken care of in Article XXI and that parties were not required to publish such information.

Article 3(a) Article 3.5(a) (formerly Article 3.5(a) (formerly

Article 3(a)) Article 3(a))

(a) Licensing procedures Licensing procedures adopted, One delegation asked what the

adopted, and practices applied, and practices applied, in implications were of "or

in connection with the issuance connection with the issuance of distortive". The sponsors

of licences for the licences for the administration replied that licensing could

administration of quotas and of quotas and other import have two effects: lessen

other import restrictions, shall restrictions, shall not have amount of trade and change the

not have trade restrictive trade restrictive or flows from one country to

effects on imports additional to distortive effects on imports another,i.e. distort.

those caused by the imposition additional to those caused by

of the restriction; the imposition of the

restriction.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 3(b) Article 3.5 (b) (formerly Article 3.5 (b) (formerly

Article 3(b)) Article 3(b))

(b) Parties shall provide, upon No substantive changes. No comments.

the request of any Party

having an interest in the trade

in the product concerned, all

relevant information

concerning:

(i) the administration of the

restrictions;

(ii) the import licences

granted over a recent period;

(iii) the distribution of such

licences among supplying

countries;

(iv) where practicable,

import statistics (i.e. value

and/or volume) with respect to

the products subject to import

licensing. The developing

countries would not be

expected to take additional

administrative or financial

burdens on this account;

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 3(c) Article 3.5 (c). (Revised Article 3.5 (c). (Revised

Article 3(c)) Based on Article 3(c))

committee recommendation

(c) Parties administering Parties administering quotas One delegation, referring to the

quotas by means of licensing by means of licensing shall reference to Art. 1.4 in Article

shall publish the overall amount publish the overall amount of 3.5(c)(d)(e), noted that again

of quotas to be applied by quotas to be applied by quantity the proposal for a time period

quantity and/or value, the and/or value, the opening and of 21 days presupposed and

opening and closing dates of closing dates of quotas, and laid too much emphasis on

quotas, and any change any change thereof, within quota systems. This country

thereof; the time periods specified did not use quota systems to

in Article 1.4 and in a implement licensing regimes

manner as to enable and would have difficulties

governments and traders with a reference to Article

to become acquainted 1.4, if Art. 1.4 were to be

with them. revised as proposed. The

sponsors replied that Article

3.5, dealt solely with quotas,

and stated that they would be

amenable to the following

alternative addition, which

would also apply to Article

3.5(d) and (e) below: "at

least 21 days prior to the

opening date for such quotas".

One delegation, while having

accepted the Recommendation,

said that introducing 21 days

would create a problem

because it currently used 8

days which allowed it, in a

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

flexible manner, to deal with its licensing procedures for certain agricultural products. 21 days would mean less flexibility and less importation.

Committee Recommendation of 19 May 1987: "The elements of information referred to in Article 3(c) should also be published in such a manner as to enable governments and traders to become acquainted with them;"

Article 3(d) Article 3.5(d): (Revised Article 3.5(d): (Revised

Article 3(d)) Based on Article 3(d))

committee recommendation

d) In the case of quotas In the case of quotas allocated Committee Recommendation of

allocated among supplying among supplying countries, the 19 May 1987: "Information on

countries, the Party applying Party applying the restrictions shares in a quota currently

the restrictions shall promptly shall promptly inform all other allocated, by quantity or value,

inform all other Parties having Parties having an interest in among supplying countries,

an interest in supplying the supplying the product referred to in Article 3(d),

product concerned of the concerned of the shares in the should be published within the

shares in the quota currently quota currently allocated, by same time period."

allocated, by quantity or value, quantity or value, to the

to the various supplying various supplying countries See under Article 3.5 (c)

countries and shall give public and shall publish this above.

notice thereof; Information within the

time periods specified in

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 1.4 and in a

manner as to enable

governments and traders

to become acquainted

with them.

Article 3(e) New Article 3.5(e) Based on New Article 3.5(e)

committee recommendation

(e) Where there is a specific Where situations arise Committee Recommendation

opening date for the submission which make it necessary 19 May 1987: "where

of licensing applications, the to provide for an early situations arise which make it

rules and product lists opening date of quotas, necessary to provide for an

referred to in paragraph 4 of the information referred early opening date of quotas,

Article 1 shall be published as to in Article 1.4 should the information referred to in

far in advance as possible of be published within the Articles 1.4 and 3(e) should be

such date, or immediately time periods specified in published no later than 7 days

after the announcement of the Article 1.4, and in a after the announcement of the

quota or other measure manner as to enable quota or other measure

involving an import licensing governments and traders involving an import licensing

requirement; to become acquainted requirement."

with them.

See under Article 3.5(c) above.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 3(f) Article 3.5(f) (formerly Article 3.5(f) (formerly

Article 3(f)) Article 3(f))

(f) Any person, firm or No substantive changes. One delegation suggested to

institution which fulfils the amend this provision by adding

legal requirements of the "legal and/or administrative

importing country shall be requirements..."

equally eligible to apply and to

be considered for a licence. If

the licence application is not

approved, the applicant shall,

on request, be given the reason

therefor and shall have a right

of appeal or review in

accordance with the domestic

legislation or procedures of the

importing country;

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

 

Article 3(g) New Article 3.5(g) Based on New Article 3.5(g)

committee recommendation

(g) The period for processing The period for processing Some delegations believed that

applications shall be as short applications should not be the 21 day limit might not be

as possible; longer than twenty-one sufficient. Some delegations

days if applications are accepted the proposal provided

considered as and when the time period could be made

received, i.e. on a longer. One delegation

first-come first-served proposed 30 days. One

basis, and no longer than delegation proposed to add

sixty days if all "where practicable", before 21

applications are days. One delegation preferred

considered a precise language. Another

simultaneously. delegation stated that it

preferred the existing Code

language. If there was to be a

change, flexibility was needed

to cater to a range of different

systems.

Committee Recommendation 19 May 1987: "The period for processing applications should normally not be longer than 21 days if applications are considered as and when received, i.e. on a first-come first-served basis, and normally no longer than 60 days if all applications are considered simultaneously;"

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 3(h) Article 3.5(h) (formerly Article 3.5(h) (formerly

Article 3(h)) Article 3(h))

(h) The period of licence No substantive changes. No comments.

validity shall be of reasonable

duration and not be so short as

to preclude imports. The

period of licence validity shall

not preclude imports from

distant sources, except in

special cases where imports

are necessary to meet

unforeseen short-term

requirements;

Article 3(i) Article 3.5(i) (formerly Article 3.5(i) (formerly

Article 3(i)) Article 3(i))

(i) When administering quotas, No substantive changes. No comments.

Parties shall not prevent

importation from being

effected in accordance with the

issued licences, and shall not

discourage the full utilization

of quotas;

Article 3(j) Article 3.5(j) (formerly Article 3.5(j) (formerly

Article 3(j)) Article 3(j))

(j) When issuing licences, No substantive changes. No comments.

Parties shall take into account

the desirability of issuing

licences for products in

economic quantities;

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 3(k) Article 3.5 (k) (Revised Article 3.5 (k) (Revised

former Articles 3(k) and 3(l)) former Articles 3(k) and 3(l))

(k) In allocating licences, In allocating licences, the One delegation suggested

Parties should consider the Party shall consider the retaining the word "should".

import performance of the import performance of the

applicant, including whether applicant. In this regard,

licences issued to the applicant consideration should be

have been fully utilized, during given as to whether lic

a recent representative period; ences issued to applicants

in the past have been ful

ly utilized during a rec

ent representative per

iod. In cases where lic

ences have not been fully

utilized, the Party shall

examine the reasons for

this and take these reas-

Article 3(l) ons into consideration

(l) Consideration shall when allocating new lic-

be given to ences. Consideration shall al-

ensuring a reasonable so be given to ensuring a reas

distribution of licences to new onable distribution of licence

importers, taking into account to new importers, taking into

the desirability of issuing account the desirability of

licences for products in issuing licences for products in

economic quantities. In this economic quantities. In this

regard, special consideration regard, special consideration

should be given to those should be given to those

importers importing products importers importing products

originating in developing originating in developing

countries and, in particular, countries and, in particular,

the least-developed countries; the least-developed countries.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

 

Article 3(m) Article 3.5(1) (formerly Article 3.5(1) (formerly

Article 3(m)) Article 3(m))

(m) In the case of quotas In the case of quotas No comments.

administered through licences administered through licences

which are not allocated among which are not allocated among

supplying countries, licence supplying countries, licence

holders (footnote: sometimes holders (footnote: sometimes

referred to as "quota referred to as "quota

holders"), shall be free to holders"), shall be free to

choose the sources of imports. choose the sources of imports.

In the case of quotas allocated In the case of quotas allocated

among supplying countries, the among supplying countries, the

licence shall clearly stipulate licence shall clearly stipulate

the country or countries; the country or countries.

Article 3(n) Article 3.5(m) (formerly Article 3.5(m) (formerly

Article 3(n)) Article 3(n))

(n) In applying paragraph 8 of In applying Article 1(8) above, No comments.

Article 1 above, compensating compensating adjustments may

adjustments may be made in be made in future licence

future licence allocations allocations where imports

where imports exceeded a exceeded a previous licence

previous licence level. level.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 4: Institutions, Revised Article 4: Institutions Revised Article 4: Institutions

consultation and dispute

settlement

Article 4.1 Revised Article 4.1 Revised Article 4.1

There shall be established There shall be established No comments.

under this Agreement a under this Agreement a

Committee on Import Licensing Committee on Import Licensing

composed of representatives composed of representatives

from each of the Parties from each of the Parties

(referred to in this Agreement (referred to in this Agreement

as "the Committee"). The as "the Committee"). The

Committee shall elect its own Committee shall elect its own

Chairman and shall meet as Chairman and Vice

necessary for the purpose of Chairman and shall meet as

affording Parties the necessary for the purpose of

opportunity of consulting on affording Parties the

any matters relating to the opportunity of consulting on

operation of this Agreement or any matters relating to the

the furtherance of its operation of this Agreement or

objectives. the furtherance of its

objectives.

Article 4.2 Article 4.2 Article 4.2

Consultations and the See new Articles 6 No comments.

settlement of disputes with (Consultations) and 7 (Dispute

respect to any matter affecting Settlement) below.

the operation of this

Agreement, shall be subject to

the procedures of Articles XXII

and XXIII of the GATT.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

New Article 5 - Notification New Article 5 - Notification

Article 5.1 Article 5.1

1. Parties which institute One delegation considered

licensing procedures or thirty days too short a period.

changes in these procedures

shall notify the Committee of

such within thirty days of

publication.

Article 5.2 Article 5.2

2. Each notification shall One delegation has noted that

include the following the majority of countries using

information: import licensing procedures

(a) list of products subject to are developing countries for

licensing procedures; whom these notification

(b) contact point for requirements, amounting to

information on eligibility and notifications of the whole

submission of applications; import policy regime, would

(c) date and name of represent a considerable

publication where licensing additional burden. In reply, it

procedures or changes in has been said that the GATT

procedures are published; Questionnaire on Import

(d) indication of whether Licensing Procedures already

licensing procedure is requires much information and

automatic or non-automatic notification was not intended to

according to definitions be an administrative burden,

contained in Articles 2 and 3; nor to duplicate the level of

detail of the Questionnaire. It was

intended to provide the essential

information

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

necessary to allow contracting parties to understand enough about the licensing procedures to be able to monitor implementation of the Code, and to provide the necessary information to traders. The relation between new Article 5.2 and Article 1.4 was also taken up. In reply to a concern expressed about too burdensome notification requirements, the drafters

(e) in the case of automatic agreed that it might be enough

licensing procedures, the to file a copy of the Official

circumstances giving rise to Gazette in question. The

introduction of the licensing drafters noted that (e) was

procedure and its underlying taken out of Article 2:2(b) of

administrative purpose; the present Code, and was

intended to make the Code more operational, for a government to raise a question if it believed the purpose of an automatic licence had been changed. This might help the implementing country in eliminating unnecessary and unintended obstacles. Four delegations supported the proposal. Two delegations considered it a duplication of the Questionnaire and Article 5.2.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

(f) in the case of non- The drafters felt strongly that

automatic import licensing Article 5.2(f) was necessary

procedures, identification of for transparency reasons and

the measure being implemented in order to make Article 3.2

through the licensing procedure operational "GATT basis" was

and the GATT basis for taking already required to be notified

the measure; and in the "QR Survey".* One

delegation, supported by five

other delegations, held that

this fact made it a duplication

to notify the basis under this

Code, which was not the right

place for such a notification.

Some delegations have added

that any party who has

difficulty with the GATT basis

for another country's measure

should address this in the right

forum, but not in the context of

import licensing procedures.

Four delegations supported the

proposed new Article 5.2(f)

(g) expected duration of the

measure and licensing

procedure or reason why this

information cannot be provided.

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

*Secretariat note: BISD 31 S, p. 221-222, paragraph 44 (iii).

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 5.3 Article 5.3

3. If a Party to the Agreement One delegation proposed the

believes that another Party has following: "If a Party to this

implemented licensing Agreement believes that

procedures but has failed in another Party has implemented

part or total to satisfy the licensing procedures but has

above notification failed in part or total to satisfy

requirements, the first Party the above notification

may bring this failure to the requirements, the first Party

attention of the Committee. may seek information on such

The first Party may also measures bilaterally from the

cross-notify these licensing Party concerned. The first

procedures. Such Party may also bring this

cross-notifications should failure to the attention of the

include all relevant and Committee, if the first Party

available information regarding could not get satisfactory

the existence and nature of the information." It noted that this

licensing procedures in was based on paragraph 3 of

question. the 1979 Decision on

Notification, Consultation,

Dispute Settlement and

Surveillance (BISD 26 S/210). Two

delegations stressed the importance of

"multilateral transparency".

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

New Articles 6 (Consultation) New Articles 6 (Consultation)

and 7 (Dispute Settlement) and 7 (Dispute Settlement)

(This Agreement's provisions No comments.

on consultation and dispute

settlement should be examined

with a view to their

improvement and clarification

taking into account, as

appropriate, the work of the

Negotiating Group on Dispute

Settlement.)

 

Article 5.5: Review New Article 8.1- Review New Article 8.1 - Review

(formerly Article 5.5) (formerly Article 5.5)

The Committee shall review as The Committee shall review as One delegation accepted the

necessary, but at least once necessary, but at least once proposal in a spirit of

every two years, the every two years, the compromise. The following

implementation and operation implementation and operation words seemed generally

of this Agreement taking into of this Agreement, taking into acceptable to delegations who

account the objectives thereof account the objectives, rights spoke: "..objectives thereof

and shall inform the and obligations and shall and the rights and obligations

CONTRACTING PARTIES to the inform the contracting parties contained therein". However,

GATT of developments during to the GATT of developments one delegation stated that

the period covered by such during the period covered by further changes might be

reviews. such reviews. needed and that one would have

to come back to the whole of

Article 8.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 8.2 Article 8.2

In conducting its review, the one delegation has asked if

Committee shall examine the "licensing régime" referred to

licensing régimes of each procedure or substance. One

signatory to ensure their sponsor has said it meant the

consistency with the principles totality of procedures and

and obligations of this practices, not the substantive

agreement, particularly those measures of which the

specified in Articles 3.2, 3.3 procedures were an

and 3.4. expression. One delegation

said this should be stated

specifically in the text itself.

Another delegation said that

this concern would be taken

into account if the Code itself

was limited to procedures. One

delegation proposed the

following language: "In

conducting its review, the

committee shall examine the

licensing regimes of each

signatory in light of the

principles and obligations of

this Agreement." One

delegation stated that the

language of Article 8.2 could

only be discussed after the

language of Article 3.2, 3.3

and 3.4 was clear. The

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

sponsors said that they would be amenable to deleting the words after the last comma. They have stressed that it was not their intention to allow the Committee to "pass judgement" but only to improve the weak language of the Review provision and make this Code similar to others.

Article 8.3 Article 8.3

The Committee shall also One delegation asked for a

examine whether the existing clarification of the relationship

provisions of the Agreement between Art.8.3 and new

are adequate to achieve its Art.9.6. Sponsors said that

objectives. Article 9.6 was a mechanical

provision that spelled out how

to amend the Agreement, if so

decided. Article 8.3 simply

made clear that in the biannual

reviews, one of the matters

that could be discussed was the

adequacy of the Agreement.

One delegation added that it

saw Article 8.3 as dealing with

the present functioning of the

Agreement and 9.6 with future

performance. One delegation

stated that it accepted this

proposal in a spirit of

compromise.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 8.4 Article 8.4

To assist in this review, the One delegation did not see a

Secretariat shall prepare a need for a Secretariat report

report based on the and questioned what purpose it

notifications, would serve given the

cross-notifications, and existence of replies to the

responses to the annual licensing questionnaire and the

licensing questionnaires. opportunity for discussion

Parties shall respond to this provided under the TPRM and

questionnaire in a prompt and BOP Committee. A sponsor

thorough manner, ensuring that noted that a review provision

their response includes all the is common to many or most

information specified in Article Codes and that this Code had a

5(2). A compilation of great potential for increased

notifications and transparency and improvement

cross-notifications shall be in this regard; most of the

appended to the report. This burden would fall on the

report shall serve as the basis Secretariat rather than on the

for the Committee review. delegations. The sort of

information produced by

reviews would be most helpful

to small, developing country

delegations who might lack

resources to conduct such

reviews on their own. One

delegation stated that it had

difficulties with this provision.

One delegation said that, as a

result of its own above-

mentioned amendment to

Article 5.3, the word "cross-

notification", should be deleted.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 8.5 Article 8.5

The Secretariat shall submit One delegation stated that it did

its report to the Committee not see a need for this

sixty days after the due date provision. Another delegation

for responses to the annual also said that it had difficulties

questionnaire. It shall with it.

incorporate the best available

information regarding the

licensing practices of those

Parties which have not

submitted responses to the

questionnaire.

Article 8.6 Article 8.6

The Committee shall begin its One delegation stated that it

review not later than sixty had difficulties with this

days after the receipt of the provision.

Secretariat report. As

appropriate, the Committee

may establish Working Groups,

consisting of Committee

members, to assist in this

review.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 5: Final provision Article 9 (formerly Article 5) Article 9 (formerly Article 5)

Article 5.1: Acceptance and Article 9.1: Acceptance Article 9.1: Acceptance and

accession accession (formerly Article accession (formerly Article

5.1) 5.1)

a) This Agreement shall be (a) This Agreement shall be No comments.

open for acceptance by open for acceptance by

signature or otherwise, by signature or otherwise, by

governments contracting governments contracting

parties to the GATT and by the parties to the GATT and by the

European Economic Community; European Economic Community;

(b) This Agreement shall be (b) This Agreement shall be

open for acceptance by open for acceptance by

signature or otherwise by signature or otherwise by

governments having governments having

provisionally acceded to the provisionally acceded to the

GATT, on terms related to the GATT, on terms related to the

effective application of rights effective application of rights

and obligations under this and obligations under this

Agreement, which take into Agreement, which take into

account rights and obligations account rights and obligations

in the instruments providing in the instruments providing

for their provisional accession; for their provisional accession;

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

(c) This Agreement shall be (c) This Agreement shall be

open to accession by any other open to accession by any other

government on terms, related government on terms, related

to the effective application of to the effective application of

rights and obligations under rights and obligations under

this Agreement, to be agreed this Agreement, to be agreed

between that government and between that government and

the Parties, by the deposit the Parties, by the deposit

with the Director-General to with the Director-General to

the CONTRACTING PARTIES to the CONTRACTING PARTIES to

the GATT of an instrument of the GATT of an instrument of

accession which states the accession which states the

terms so agreed; terms so agreed;

(d) In regard to acceptance, (d) In regard to acceptance,

the provisions of Article the provisions of Article

XXVI:5(a) and (b) of the XXVI:5(a) and (b) of the

General Agreement would be General Agreement would be

applicable. applicable.

 

 

Article 5.2: Reservations Article 9.2: Reservations Article 9.2. Reservations

(formerly Article 5.2) (formerly Article 5.2)

Reservations may not be Reservations may not be No comments.

entered in respect of any of the entered in respect of any of the

provisions of this Agreement provisions of this Agreement

without the consent of the without the consent of the

other Parties. other Parties.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 5.3: Entry into force Article 9.3: Entry into Force Article 9.3: Entry into Force

(formerly Article 5.3) (formerly Article 5.3)

This Agreement shall enter into This Agreement shall enter into No comments.

force on 1 January 1980 for force on 1 January 1980 for

the governments (footnote: the governments (footnote:

For the purpose of this For the purpose of this

Agreement, the term Agreement, the term

"governments" is deemed to "governments" is deemed to

include the competent include the competent

authorities of the European authorities of the European

Economic Community) which Economic Community) which

have accepted or acceded to it have accepted or acceded to it

by that date. For each other by that date. For each other

government it shall enter into government it shall enter into

force on the thirtieth day force on the thirtieth day

following the date of its following the date of its

acceptance or accession to this acceptance or accession to this

Agreement. Agreement.

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 5.4: National Article 9.4: National Article 9.4: National

legislation Legislation (formerly Article Legislation (formerly Article

5.4) 5.4)

(a) Each government accepting (a) Each government accepting No comments.

or acceding to this Agreement or acceding to this Agreement

shall ensure, not later than the shall ensure, not later than the

date of entry into force of this date of entry into force of this

Agreement for it, the Agreement for it, the

conformity of its laws, conformity of its laws,

regulations and administrative regulations and administrative

procedures with the provisions procedures with the provisions

of this Agreement. of this Agreement.

(b) Each Party shall inform the (b) Each Party shall inform the

Committee of any changes in Committee of any changes in

its laws and regulations its laws and regulations

relevant to this Agreement and relevant to this Agreement and

in the administration of such in the administration of such

laws and regulations. laws and regulations.

Article 5.5: Review (see

above)

 

1 June, 1990

Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures

PRESENT CODE PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED COMMENTS

STATES AND HONG KONG

Article 5.6: Amendments Article 9.6: Amendments Article 9.6: Amendments

(formerly Article 5.6) (formerly Article 5.6)

The Parties may amend this The Parties may amend this No comments.

Agreement, having regard, Agreement, having regard,

inter alia, to the experience inter alia, to the experience

gained in its implementation. gained in its implementation.

Such an amendment, once the Such an amendment, once the

Parties have concurred in Parties have concurred in

accordance with procedures accordance with procedures

established by the Committee, established by the Committee,

shall not come into force for shall not come into force for

any Party until it has been any Party until it has been

accepted by such Party. accepted by such Party.

Article 5.7: Withdrawal Article 9.7: Withdrawal Article 9.7: Withdrawal

(formerly Article 5.7) (formerly Article 5.7)

Any Party may withdraw from Any Party may withdraw from No comments.

this Agreement. The this Agreement. The

withdrawal shall take effect withdrawal shall take effect

upon the expiration of sixty upon the expiration of sixty

days from the day on which days from the day on which

written notice of withdrawal is written notice of withdrawal is

received by the received by the

Director-General to the Director-General to the

CONTRACTING PARTIES to the CONTRACTING PARTIES to the

GATT. Any Party may upon GATT. Any Party may upon

such notification request an such notification request an

immediate meeting of the immediate meeting of the

Committee. Committee.