SEE ALSO:
> Agriculture negotiations news
> More on the modalities phase
Need help on downloading?
> Find help here
Mr
Walker, who is also New Zealand’s ambassador to the WTO, was speaking at the
end of the latest set of meetings on 7, 8 and 11 December. The focus was
largely on the more technical issues of preparing “templates” (blank tables
and forms, explained below) and data. Both of these will be needed for members
to list their new commitments on opening markets or cutting tariffs or
subsidies arising from the negotiations.
He also outlined briefly the consultations he has been holding privately
with delegations on one of the issues that remain undecided in the
current “Rev.4” draft “modalities”. This was the
special safeguard mechanism (SSM, explained
here).
In his summary, the chairperson refers to an EU presentation to delegates on its “Meursing Table” and how this could be simplified. The EU uses the Meursing Table to determine the customs tariffs for some processed agricultural products based on what they are made of. These products include confectionary, cakes and biscuits. Their tariffs are defined according to the level of milk fats and proteins, sugar and starch they contain. The table results in a possible 27,720 combinations of tariffs which the EU has offered to reduce to less than 300.
Audio
Use these links to download the audio files or to listen to what he said:
Monday 7 December 2009 (on “templates” and data)
Audio:
Chairperson Walker’s opening statement part 1
Audio:
Chairperson Walker’s opening statement part 2
Friday 11 December 2009 (wrap-up of the week)
Audio: Chairperson Walker’s statement part 1 (templates)
Audio: Chairperson Walker’s statement part 2 (data)
Audio: Chairperson Walker’s statement part 3 (modalities issues)
> help
This meeting
This was an informal agriculture negotiations meeting of the full membership, officially an “Informal Open-Ended Special Session” of the Agriculture Committee.
The latest texts and a number of related issues can be found with explanations here, including what “the text” is and says, and a “jargon buster”.
The current phase of the negotiations is about “modalities”, explained here.
Explanation
Explanations of the issues are available for the chairperson’s 2008 drafts and reports.
Templates and data. Part of the technical work is on organizing the data
necessary to calculate commitments, which will be listed in “schedules” of
commitments. Electronic forms or tables will
be used to present base data — data to be used as the starting point for
calculating commitments — in a way that is transparent and verifiable.
Eventually they will be used to design “templates” for how the commitments
will be presented.
Among the data needed are domestic consumption, for calculating the tariff
quotas on sensitive products, and values of production for calculating
domestic support commitments.
The technical work follows the draft “modalities” text of December 2008 and
is in two steps:
Step 1: considering what “base data” are needed under the present draft
“modalities” — what is already available, what will need to be
“constructed”, and whether the draft “modalities” says how this should be
done. This step would also include the question of whether supporting tables
— tables displaying the data and how they are derived — are needed and what
their format would be.
Step 2: developed from step 1, designing “templates” or blank forms to be
used for the commitments resulting from the Doha Round negotiations, and for
any supporting data required. Parts of the data could be presented before,
during or after “modalities” have been agreed.
(Chairperson Walker has also referred to an eventual step 3: filling in the
numbers.)
Schedules: In general, a WTO member’s list of commitments on market access
(bound tariff rates, access to services markets). Goods schedules can
include commitments on agricultural subsidies and domestic support. Services
commitments include bindings on national treatment.
Templates: Here, blank forms prepared for the schedules of commitments, and
for data used to calculate the commitments. Some of the data will be in
“supporting tables” attached to the schedules of commitments.
Modalities: A way to proceed. In WTO negotiations, modalities set broad
outlines — such as formulas or approaches for tariff reductions — for final
commitments. In agriculture, the modalities include formulas and approaches
for cutting domestic support and export subsidies as well.
The three pillars: the main areas covered by the agriculture negotiations —
export competition (export subsidies and related issues), domestic support
and market access.
The story so far
2000:
Agriculture negotiations launched(March).
See backgrounder
2001: Doha Development Agenda launched. Agriculture included (November)
2004: “Framework” agreed (August)
2005: Further agreements in Hong Kong Ministerial Conference (December)
2006: Draft modalities (June)
2007: Revised draft modalities (July)
2007-2008: Intensive negotiations with working documents (September-January)
2008: Revised draft modalities (February, May and July)
2008: The July 2008 package full coverage and the chair’s report
AT A GLANCE
This technical
work would take the negotiators through the following
sequence, leading to “schedules” (lists or tables) of
commitments:
1. Members identify data needs and design blank forms
(“templates”) for data and for commitments (now and
through the autumn)
2. “Modalities” (formulas, flexibilities, disciplines)
agreed, perhaps with agreed blank forms or tables, and
with some data attached
3. “Scheduling” — forms/tables filled in. Some are
draft commitments, based on “modalities” formulas. Some
are supporting tables of data
4. Members verify each others’ draft commitments,
using the supporting data.
5. Commitments are agreed as part of the Doha Round
single undertaking
This work is technical, but some political questions also
still have to be sorted out before “modalities” can be
agreed.
> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact [email protected] giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.