WTO: 2011 NEWS ITEMS

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

> Disputes in the WTO
> Find disputes cases
> Find disputes documents

> Disputes chronologically
> Disputes by subject
> Disputes by country

  

NOTE:
This summary has been prepared by the WTO Secretariat’s Information and External Relations Division to help public understanding about developments in WTO disputes. It is not a legal interpretation of the issues, and it is not intended as a complete account of the issues. These can be found in the reports themselves and in the minutes of the Dispute Settlement Body’s meetings.

Panel establishment

DS415-DS416-DS417-DS418: Dominican Republic — Safeguard measures on imports of polypropylene bags and tubular fabric

A single Panel was established following Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador's second time request (WT/DS415/7, WT/DS416/7, WT/DS417/7, WT/DS418/7) to review the safeguard measures imposed by the Dominican Republic on imports of plastic bags and tubular fabric.

All four complainants reiterated their statements made at the last meeting of the DSB (25 January 2011) which considered this issue for the first time.

They all asked the Panel to submit its report within the 6 month period as established by article 12.8 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), given the urgency of the situation (editor's note: the Dominican safeguard measures have been applied for 18 months starting 18 October 2010 — see panel requests referred above).

The Dominican Republic said that one single round of negotiations would not enable parties to resolve all issues and objected to the establishment of a Panel.

Panama regretted that the Dominican Republic did not give a positive consideration to the concerns raised by the four complainants. Panama added that it joined consultations (WT/DS415/2WT/DS416/2WT/DS417/2 — WT/DS418/2) having substantial commercial interests in this issue. Panama said that the products covered by the safeguard measures were important for its exporters. Panama said the Dominican safeguard measures did not apply to its products but this could change any time.

Panama, Columbia, Nicaragua, the EU, Turkey, China and the US reserved their third-party rights.

Implementation

DS399: US — Measures Affecting Imports of Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tyres from China

China and the US inscribed this item on the DSB's agenda. Taking into account the workload of the Appellate Body, China and the US jointly requested (WT/DS399/5) that the DSB adopt a draft decision to extend the 60-day time period to 24 May 2011.

Under Article 16.4 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), the DSB has to adopt a panel report within a 60-day period unless it decides not to do so by consensus or unless the report is appealed.

The Panel report (WT/DS399/R) related to this dispute was circulated on 13 December 2010 and would have expired on 13 February 2011.

The US said that it was not joining this request out of any concerns with the Panel report and added that the report conclusions were well-founded. The US noted that it was the third decision the DSB had taken this year to delay possible appeals in three different disputes. The US said that the Appellate Body was currently working on two appeals, one of which was filed in July 2010. The US called for a swift resolution of these pending appeals which could help minimize delays and backlogs.

Following this joint request, the DSB agreed that it shall, no later than 24 May 2011, adopt the Panel report, unless the DSB decides by consensus not to do so or China or the US notifies the DSB of its decision to appeal following Article 16.4 of the DSU.

  

back to top

Next meeting 

The next meeting of the DSB will be held on 24 February 2011.

RSS news feeds

> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact [email protected] giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.