3rd WTO MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE
Top 10 Reasons to Oppose the World Trade Organization? Criticism, yes … misinformation, no!
More incorrect facts about the WTO found on websites:
SEE
ALSO:
> Other
ministerial meetings
6. The US adoption of the WTO was undemocratic
The WTO was established out of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations. On December 1, 1994 [1], Congress approved GATT under Fast Track during a lame duck session of Congress. Fast Track limits public debate by not allowing amendments [2]. The approval of the WTO required entire sections of US laws to be rewritten [3] to conform with the WTO rules, similar to the way that treaties often redefine how the US will interact with other states. Had the agreement been voted on as a treaty, requiring a two-thirds majority in the Senate, it would have been defeated.
The reality
How countries ratify the WTO agreements is an internal issue. The WTO cannot comment on the process in each country, and it cannot speculate on the result of a vote in different circumstances.
In addition, certain principles apply to all countries:
1. There was a lot of democratic public debate around the world during the almost seven years (1986-94) of the negotiations, including in the United States. The pressure of public opinion determined countries' positions in the negotiations. The final ratification period, from the signing in April 1994 to December 1994, was no more than that: a final period of a long negotiation that included more than 100 countries, not only the US.
2. All countries had the option to accept or reject the agreement. However, by 1994 any attempt to amend the agreement would have meant reopening the negotiation which had already taken seven and a half years. It would probably have killed the agreement. WTO member governments and parliaments decided that would have been the worst option.
Agreement was reached because all participating countries believed they had reached the point where on balance the benefits outweighed the discomfort, both politically and economically. Such a bargain could not have been struck if countries were allowed individually to pick and choose only the bits they preferred.
3. All countries had to face changes that were domestically unpopular. But they considered this to be outweighed by the benefits of the package. In many cases, other countries had to accept changes demanded by the United States.
The accusations
1. The
WTO only serves the interests of
multinational corporations
2. The
WTO is a stacked court
3. The
WTO tramples over labor and human rights
4. The
WTO is destroying the environment
5. The
WTO is killing people
6. The US adoption of the WTO was
undemocratic
7. The
WTO undermines local development and
penalizes poor countries
8. The
WTO is increasing inequality
9. The
WTO undermines national sovereignty
10. The
tide is turning against free trade and the
WTO!
Find out more
In
the booklet, Seattle: What’s at stake?
> Concerns
… and responses (1)
> Concerns
… and responses (2)
On
the main WTO website
> 10
Common Misunderstandings about the WTO