WTO: 2006 NEWS ITEMS
2 March 2006
WTO COTTON SUB-COMMITTEE
Members mull new details in ‘Cotton Four’ proposal
The Cotton-Four have clarified their proposal for cutting and eventually eliminating trade-distorting domestic support in a new paper discussed in the Cotton Sub-Committee on 2 March 2006. The new details include a formula designed to ensure that the cuts on cotton are deeper than those for agriculture as a whole, Chad, one of the four, told the committee.
NOTE:
THIS NEWS ITEM IS DESIGNED TO HELP THE PUBLIC UNDERSTAND DEVELOPMENTS IN
THE WTO. WHILE EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THE CONTENTS ARE
ACCURATE, IT DOES NOT PREJUDICE MEMBER GOVERNMENTS’ POSITIONS. THE
OFFICIAL RECORD IS IN THE MEETING’S MINUTES
> Cotton, including the sub-committee
> Hong
Kong Ministerial Declaration (section on cotton)
> Mandate
(July-August 2004 framework, paragraph 1.b and Annex A paragraph 4)
> Background
explanations in the agriculture negotiations backgrounder
SEE ALSO:
> Press releases
> News archives
> Pascal
Lamy’s speeches
A number of countries supported the direction of the proposal, which was in a document TN/AG/SCC/GEN/4, submitted the day before the meeting — meaning it was only available in French at the meeting. However, all speakers said they needed more time to look at it, several saying they needed to see the English version first.
back to top
Trade issues
The formula (spelt out below) is
designed so that the cut in Amber Box (or AMS) subsidies for cotton
are deeper than those for agriculture as a whole, an objective
agreed at the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference in December 2005 (see
background explanation).
The four proposing countries — Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad and Mali —
have also designed the formula so that the additional cut for cotton
would be greater if the general cut for agriculture is more modest;
the additional cut would not need to be large if the general
reduction for agriculture is already ambitious. These cuts would
take place over a period that is one third of the general
implementation period for AMS cuts.
The paper goes further, even on the Amber Box: it also calls on WTO
members to agree by the end of April (when the modalities are due to
be agreed) to eliminate all trade-distorting domestic supports by a
date to be agreed on before the end of the Doha Round (so that the
end date would be part of the “single undertaking”). That date would
be after the end of the Doha Round.
It includes a proposed ceiling on Blue Box subsidies for cotton of
one-third of the ceiling on the Blue Box for agriculture as a whole.
Benin, which has just taken over as coordinator of the African
Group, said the group wholly endorses the proposal. Supporting the
general approach, if not yet the specifics, were China, Brazil,
Paraguay and some others, even though they still needed time to
study the proposal.
Some countries, such as the EU, China and Australia, welcomed the
new paper for clarifying an issue. The Cotton Four’s previous
document (TN/AG/SCC/GEN/3) had called for Amber Box cuts on
cotton that are three times the cuts for agriculture as a whole.
This had suggested that if the general cuts were over 33%, the cuts
for cotton would be over 100%, they said, whereas the new formula
has clarified this.
New Zealand broadly supported the call for the total elimination of
trade distorting supports. But the US said it cannot discuss this
document substantively until it knows what is going to happen for
agriculture as a whole and until it has seen the English version. A
substantial result on domestic support for cotton requires a
substantial result in all three pillars in agriculture, the US said.
back to top
Development issues
The Secretariat reported on consultations on the
development aspects on 16 February, when several members reported new
developments in the assistance they are providing and recipient countries
strongly supported the reported implementation of these programmes. Some
called for the assistance to the extended to other African countries in
similar circumstances, the Secretariat reported.
The consultations on the development side are chaired by Stuart Harbinson,
special advisor to the director-general.
back to top
The formula
If
Rg = the AMS cut for agriculture in general, and
Rc = the AMS cut for cotton
Then
Rc = Rg + [(100 – Rg) x 100] / 3 x Rg
(The cut for cotton equals the general cut plus an adjustment term that gets
smaller if the general cut is bigger)
The Cotton Four’s paper gives some example calculations:
-
A 60% general cut would produce an 82.2% cut for cotton (a difference of 22.2 percentage points)
-
A 70% general cut would produce an 84.3% cut for cotton (a difference of 14.3 percentage points)
-
An 80% general cut would produce an 88.3% cut for cotton (a difference of 8.3 percentage points)
-
A 90% general cut would produce a 93.7% cut for cotton (a difference of 3.7 percentage points)
-
A 100% general cut would produce a 100% cut for cotton (a difference of 0 percentage points)
back to top
Next meetings
Tentatively 27 March and possibly 24 April 2006.