> Disputes in the WTO
> Find disputes cases
> Find disputes documents
> Disputes chronologically
> Disputes by subject
> Disputes by country
NOTE:
This summary has been prepared by the WTO Secretariat’s Information and
External Relations Division to help public understanding about developments
in WTO disputes. It is not a legal interpretation of the issues, and it is
not intended as a complete account of the issues. These can be found in
the reports themselves and in the minutes of the Dispute Settlement
Body’s meetings.
Panel establishment
DS399: United States — Measures affecting imports of certain
passenger vehicle and light truck tyres from China
A panel was established at China's second-time request (WT/DS399/2) which
challenged US measures restricting imports on certain Chinese tyres.
China deeply regretted the US decision to impose restrictions on Chinese
tyres and believed it was a departure of international consensus of G20
leaders to fight against protectionism. China urged the US to promptly
withdraw its measures.
The US remained confident that the measures challenged were consistent with
its WTO obligations and with the product-specific safeguard mechanism
provided in China's Protocol of Accession. The US regretted that China would
dispute this safeguard. The US added that in just four years, US tyre
imports from China more than tripled by volume and the value of those
imports rose to USD 1.8 billion. The US said that in those same four years
its production had fallen by more than 25 per cent, while 14 per cent of US
workers in the industry had lost their jobs.
The EU, Japan, Chinese Taipei, Turkey and Viet Nam reserved their
third-party rights.
DS396: Philippines — taxes on distilled spirits
A panel was established at the EU's second-time request (WT/DS396/4) which
challenged the Philippines tax regime on distilled spirits.
The EU said it had no choice but to request the establishment of a panel for
a second time and declared that recent statements by the Philippines clearly
indicated that there was no prospect to the passing of a bill that would
bring a solution to this problem. The EU noted that this longstanding tax
discrimination had worsened over the years and added that imported spirits
were subject to an excise tax 10 to 50 times higher than the tax imposed on
domestic spirits. The EU said that its exports to the Philippines had more
than halved between 2004 and 2007, as a result of this increasing
discrimination.
The US said that it was concerned as well about the Philippines' excise tax
and its effect on market access for its exports of distilled spirits. The US
said that it filed a request for consultations with the Philippines on 14
January 2010 (WT/DS403/1).
The Philippines regretted that the EU had chosen to renew its request for
the establishment of a panel. The Philippines reiterated its full commitment
to a rules-based multilateral trading system and firmly believed that its
excise tax was fully consistent with its WTO obligations. The Philippines
took note of the US consultations request and remained of the view that this
matter could have been resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all parties if
the respective interests, the legitimate sensitivities and policy objectives
of all sides had been taken into account.
China, Australia, Mexico, Chinese Taipei, Thailand and the US reserved their
third-party rights.
Adoption of reports
DS363: China — Measures affecting trading rights and distribution
services for certain publications and audiovisual entertainment products
In this dispute, the US challenged China's measures affecting market access
and distribution services of goods such as movies, DVDs, videos,
publications or books.
At today's meeting, the DSB adopted the
Appellate Body report (WT/DS363/AB/R) and the
Panel report (WT/DS363/R and
Corr.1).
The US said that it was looking forward to China moving promptly to
implement the DSB's recommendations and rulings upon adoption of these
reports.
China said it would examine the reports carefully and prudently and would
advise the DSB of its intentions in respect to the implementation of the
recommendations.
The EU called on China to expeditiously implement the recommendations in
order to remove what constituted important shortcomings in China's import
and distribution regime. The EU said it remained convinced that China could
develop and implement its cultural policies within the boundaries set by its
WTO obligations.
Japan raised a number of legal issues contained in the reports.
Implementation of DSB rulings
According to Article 21.6 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, the DSB has to keep under surveillance the implementation of adopted rulings. At each regular meeting of the DSB, therefore, the member concerned provides a written and oral status report on its progress in the implementation of rulings.
DS362: China — measures affecting the protection and enforcement of
intellectual property rights
In this dispute, the DSB adopted the Panel report on 20 March 2009. On 15
April 2009, China informed the DSB of its intention to implement the
recommendations contained in the report. China has until 20 March 2010 to
comply with the ruling as agreed with the US.
At today's meeting, China presented its first status report (WT/DS362/14) on
the actions it undertook to comply with the ruling.
China said that it had done a lot of substantial work related to
implementation. China said that the legislative proposals relating to the
amendment of the Copyright Law of China and the Regulations for Customs
Protection of Intellectual Property Rights had already been submitted to the
State Council for examination.
The US looked forward to China's implementation by 20 March 2010.
The EU was glad that China had already submitted relevant legislative
proposals to the State Council. The EU hoped that this dispute would
contribute to the improvement of China's intellectual property right (IPR)
framework. The EU recognised the efforts deployed so far by China to improve
IPR protection and enforcement and looked forward to further cooperation in
order to reduce infringement levels and to ensure a strong and legally
certain environment for IPR in China.
Other disputes currently under the DSB's surveillance
See summary on the last DSB
meeting for an update.
back to top
Other business
Colombia made a statement in
relation to the Director-General's report released on 22 December 2009
(WT/DS361/2 and
WT/DS364/2) on his good offices activities in the banana
case. Colombia said that it understood that the Director-General's report
did not prejudice its rights under the WTO, including those drawn from the
disputes and claims identified in paragraph 5 of the Geneva agreement on
trade in bananas (WT/L/784) and under the terms of paragraph 6 of that
same agreement.
back to top
Next meeting
The next meeting of the DSB will be held on 18 February 2010.
> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact [email protected] giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.