Click here to return to homepage
../../../175pxls.gif (78 bytes)

 ON THIS PAGE:   Key facts   Summary of the dispute to date

home > trade topics > dispute settlement > the disputes >

Topics handled by WTO committees and agreements
Issues covered by the WTO’s committees and agreements

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS325

United States — Anti-Dumping Determinations regarding Stainless Steel from Mexico


This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.

  

See also:
The basics: how disputes are settled in WTO
Computer based training on dispute settlement
Text of the Dispute Settlement Understanding


Key facts  back to top

Short title:

Complainant:

Respondent:

Third Parties:

Request for Consultations received:

 

Summary of the dispute to date  back to top

Summary up-to-date at

Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified

Complaint by Mexico.

On 5 January 2005, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning (i) certain final anti-dumping determinations made by the United States Department of Commerce (“USDOC”) in respect of stainless steel sheet and strip coils from Mexico and (ii) certain generally applicable United States anti-dumping laws, regulations and administrative practices.

In respect of (i), according to Mexico, in each of the four determinations at issue the USDOC applied a methodology involving “zeroing” of negative dumping margins. In Mexico’s view, this may have resulted in the DOC making incorrect determinations of dumping margins and unfair comparisons. In respect of (ii), the generally applicable US anti-dumping laws, regulations and administrative practices which are of concern to Mexico are: Sections 736, 751, 771(35)(A) and (B), and 777A(c) and (d) of the US Tariff Act of 1930; and the USDOC rules codified in Title 19 of United States Code of Federal Regulations, sections 351.212(b), 351.414 c), d) and e). Mexico considers that both (i) and (ii) may be inconsistent with the US’ obligations under: Articles 1, 2 (in particular Articles 2.1, 2.4 and 2.4.2), 5 (in particular Article 5.8), 9 (in particular Article 9.3), 11 (in particular Article 11.2) and 18.4 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement; Articles VI:1 and VI:2 , as well as X:3(a) of the GATT 1994; and Article XVI:4 of the WTO Agreement.

On 13 January 2005, Japan requested to join the consultations. On 19 January 2005, the European Communites requested to join the consultations.

image 160 pixels wide
  

Find all documents from this case
(Searches Documents Online, most recent documents appear on top)

quick help with downloading
> comprehensive help on Documents Online

all documents

  

Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.

contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland