NOTE:
CET ARTICLE A POUR OBJET D’AIDER LE PUBLIC À MIEUX COMPRENDRE L’ÉVOLUTION
DE LA QUESTION À L’OMC. BIEN QUE TOUT AIT ÉTÉ FAIT POUR GARANTIR L’EXACTITUDE
DES RENSEIGNEMENTS QUI Y FIGURENT, L’ARTICLE NE PRÉJUGE PAS DES
DISPOSITIONS DES GOUVERNEMENTS MEMBRES. LE RÉSUMÉ OFFICIEL DES DÉBATS
FIGURE DANS LE COMPTE RENDU DE LA RÉUNION.
VOIR AUSSI:
> Explication dans “Comprendre l’OMC”
The committee also continued to look at how to improve
sharing information under an evolving work plan on improving notification and
access to notified information, which developed from members’ replies to a
questionnaire and began to take shape in the committee’s
March meeting.
And as usual members asked each other questions about the latest developments in
their policies.
The “regular” Agriculture Committee meetings deal with routine WTO work, and not
the current negotiations, which take place in
separate “special sessions”.
Some details
Agricultural trade
The figures on agricultural exports come from the latest annual WTO Secretariat
report on how well members are participating in the trade (document G/AG/W/32/Rev.11). Because this is linked to members’ commitments on export
subsidies, the report looks at trends since 1986—90, which was the base period
countries used when they calculated their export subsidies cuts under the
present Agriculture Agreement.
It also looks at the performance of countries that made commitments to cut their
subsidies as well as countries that are described as “significant exporters” of
13 products or product groups: wheat and wheat flour; course grains; rice;
sugar; skim milk powder; butter and butter oil; cheese; whole milk powder;
bovine meat; pigmeat; poultry meat; oilseeds; and fruit and vegetables.
In 2007, the year of the latest available data, some WTO members or observers
saw their exports in some products rise fast enough for them to be included in
the top exporters lists for those products, the committee heard — Ukraine for
coarse grains, India for sugar and bovine meat, Belarus for skim milk powder,
the US for butter and butter oil, China for whole milk powder, and Chile for
fruit and vegetables.
Overall, agricultural exports reached $573.5 billion in 2007, up from $479.0
billion the previous year, and from the average of $195.0 billion in the 1986—90
base period. For more details, see the
document G/AG/W/32/Rev.11.
Australia, Argentina and New Zealand said countries should not increase their
export subsidies. For example, US and EU dairy subsidies will have an impact on
global prices because the two are among the top three dairy exporters, they
said.
Developed countries agreed to cut their export subsidies over six years,
1995-2000, by 36% (in terms of money) from levels in the base period (21% in
terms of subsidized quantities). Developing countries made smaller cuts (24% in
money terms, 14% in subsidized quantities) over 10 years, 1995-2004. The limits
at the end of those periods continue to apply today.
Food aid and the food situation
The World Food Programme and World Bank reported that although food prices are
easing globally, problems remain, particularly in poorer countries. “People eat
less and eat less well,” the World Food Programme said. It observed that food
aid deliveries have declined from 15 million tonnes in 1999 to 6 million in
2007. Describing various improvements it is introducing, the WFP added that its
assistance has helped bring some stability to a sometimes volatile situation
that saw food riots in 30 countries in the first half of 2008.
Referring to the value of the Food Aid Convention which stipulates commitments
to minimum quantities of annual food aid, the International Grains Council noted
that during the recent peak in prices and transportation costs, the volume did
not decline significantly.
The World Bank observed that the situation is easing, with countries lowering
taxes and export restrictions although problems remain in some areas. It added
that access to global markets is also essential for food security. The Bank
urged countries to refrain from raising trade barriers and high income countries
not to increase subsidies. Concluding the WTO’s Doha Round negotiations and
various aid-for-trade programmes are also necessary, the World Bank said.
Officially this came under an agenda item on the annual monitoring and follow-up
of the Marrakesh decision on least-developed and net food-importing developing
countries.
Notifications and review, and related questions
The questions members ask each other under the review of notifications is part
of the committee’s key responsibility of overseeing how countries are complying
with their commitments. They can also ask about agricultural measures that have
not yet been notified or have not been notified at all.
These included:
-
Australia to CANADA on: measures on dairy products and tariff quota commitments on milk protein concentrates
-
The EU to SWITZERLAND on: export subsidies on processed agricultural products
-
New Zealand to CANADA on: dairy policies
-
The US to the EU on: member states’ support measures
-
Canada to COLOMBIA on: imports under beef tariff quota
-
Canada and New Zealand to the EU on: new tariff quotas and imports under cheese tariff quotas
-
The US to COSTA RICA on: Amber Box domestic support in 2007
-
The US to DOMINICAN REPUBLIC on: some of its Green Box support
-
The EU to ISRAEL on: some of its Green Box support
-
Canada and the US to JORDAN on: increased expenditure on research and infrastructural services between 2005 and 2006; and production figures for wheat and barley
-
Australia and the EU to NORWAY on: details of its domestic support notification
-
The EU and US to SOUTH AFRICA on: Green Box supports.
-
The EU and US to Chinese Taipei on: disaster relief, environmental programmes and other Green Box supports
-
Canada and the US to TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO on: Green Box supports
-
The EU to AUSTRALIA on: disaster flood assistance
-
Australia and Canada to the EU on: export subsidies, including the on-going question of the calculation of the EU’s commitments after enlargement to 25 and 27 members, which still has to be certified.
-
Australia to PAKISTAN on: a subsidy on freight for exports of fruit and vegetables
Improving transparency
As part of on-going work on improving transparency, members agreed that their questions and answers will be issued as an official WTO document to be derestricted after a period.
Overdue notifications
Australia continued to urge members to keep their notifications up-to-date, this time highlighting overdue notifications from Venezuela, China, Egypt, India, Israel, Rep.Korea, Turkey. The EU and US supported the concern.
Présidente: Mme Valéria Csukasi (Uruguay)
Prochaines réunions
2010 tentatively:
-
11 March
-
10—11 June (to be confirmed)
-
16—17 September
-
18—19 November
• Catégorie orange: soutien interne à l’agriculture considéré comme ayant des effets de distorsion des échanges et donc soumis aux engagements de réduction. Il est calculé, en principe, en tant que “mesure globale du soutien” (MGS).
• Catégorie bleue: soutien de la catégorie orange, mais avec des contraintes pour la production ou d’autres conditions conçues pour réduire la distorsion. Actuellement non limitée.
• Green Box: Domestic support for agriculture that is allowed without limits because it does not distort trade, or at most causes minimal distortion.
• de minimis: montants minimaux de soutien interne qui sont autorisés bien qu’ils faussent les échanges — jusqu’à 5 pour cent de la valeur de la production pour les pays développés, 10 pour cent pour les pays en développement.
• notification: une obligation de transparence exigeant des gouvernements Membres qu’ils déclarent les mesures commerciales qu’ils prennent à l’organe pertinent de l’OMC si ces mesures sont susceptibles d’affecter d’autres Membres.
• Soutien interne global ayant des effets de distorsion des échanges (SGEDE): dans les négociations sur l’agriculture menées dans le cadre du Cycle de Doha: catégorie orange + de minimis + catégorie bleue (voir ci-dessus).
• contingent tarifaire: les quantités contingentaires font l’objet de taux de droits à l’importation plus faibles que les quantités hors contingent (pour lesquelles les taux peuvent être élevés).
> Mieux comprendre le jargon: glossaire
> Des problèmes pour visualiser cette page?
Veuillez écrire à [email protected] en indiquant le système d’exploitation et le navigateur que vous utilisez.