|
Canada — Autos (WT/DS139/12; WT/DS142/12)
back to top
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)
prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2.5
discretion and ARB.2.5
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21),
impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)
“reasonable period”
shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process
ARB.5.1.7
“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular
circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.2.6, ARB.5.1.7
Canada — Patent Term (WT/DS170/10)
back to top
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21),
impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)
“reasonable period”
contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.5-7
economic harm likely to accrue to nationals of other Members,
relevance ARB.5.9.1
flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5.12.2
shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process
ARB.5.1.9
“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular
circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.1.9
TRIPS, patents, term of protection (TRIPS 33), economic consequences
of termination of non-WTO consistent measure, relevance ARB.5.9.1
Canada — Pharmaceutical Patents (WT/DS114/13)
back to top
burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB
recommendations and rulings ARB.5.6.4,
ARB.6.2-3
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)
consistency with WTO obligations, responsibility for determining
ARB.1.4-8
mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable
period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1.4-8
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21),
impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)
ARB.4.1.1-2
“reasonable period”
administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5.6.3
burden of proof ARB.5.6.4,
ARB.6.2-3
complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.2,
ARB.5.5.2
contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.2-3
shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process
ARB.4.3.4, ARB.5.1.5-6
structural adjustment, relevance of need for ARB.5.7.2
“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular
circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.2.5,
ARB.5.1.5-6
Chile — Alcoholic Beverages (WT/DS87/15; WT/DS110/14)
back to top
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)
developing countries and (DSU 21.2), “reasonable period”
ARB.5.10.2-3
prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2.4
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21),
impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)
“reasonable period”
contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.1
shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process
ARB.4.3.3
“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular
circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.2.4, ARB.5.1.4
Chile — Price Band System (WT/DS207/13)
back to top
AB reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 17.14), as critical date for
determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.2.2
compliance, WTO obligations, good faith / pacta sunt servanda principle
ARB.5.4.9
good faith (including pacta sunt servanda principle (VCLT 26))
compliance with WTO obligations ARB.5.4.9
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) ARB.5.4.9
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)
developing countries and (DSU 21.2), “reasonable period” ARB.5.10.4
good faith obligation ARB.5.4.9
prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2.8
actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB.5.2.2
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21),
impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB.2.8
“reasonable period”
administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5.5.9
complexity of implementation process ARB.5.4.6-9,
ARB.5.6.6-8
contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.9
shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process
ARB.4.3.6-7, ARB.5.1.10
“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular
circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4.2.8, ARB.5.1.10
panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for
determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.2.2
Colombia — Ports of Entry (Article 21.3(c)) (WT/DS366/13) back to top
burden of proof, implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU
21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time, “reasonable”
period ARB.6.12
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21)
choice of means at Member’s discretion
withdrawal or modification options ARB.1.19,
ARB.3.1.6
withdrawal of WTO-inconsistent measure as first objective ARB.3.1.6,
ARB.3.1.19
developing countries and (DSU 21.2) ARB.5.10.13
mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable
period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1.19
prompt compliance (DSU 21.1), actions taken since DSB adoption of
report, relevance ARB.5.2.4
implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21),
impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau)
“reasonable period”
burden of proof ARB.6.12
complexity of implementing measures ARB.5.3.7
contentiousness, relevance ARB.5.5.13
flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.4.3.16
shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process
ARB.4.3.17
“time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular
circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.1.12
panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for
determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5.2.4
|
