United Kingdom — Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment

This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.


See also:
One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
The basics: how disputes are settled in WTO
Computer based training on dispute settlement
Text of the Dispute Settlement Understanding

Current status  back to top


Key facts  back to top

Short title:



Third Parties:

Agreements cited:
(as cited in request for consultations)
Request for Consultations received:

Panel Report circulated: 5 February 1998
Appellate Body Report circulated: 5 June 1998


Summary of the dispute to date  back to top

The summary below was up-to-date at
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute


Complaints by the United States.

These are in respect of the alleged reclassification by the European Communities, for tariff purposes, of certain Local Area Network (LAN) adapter equipment and personal computers with multimedia capability. The US alleged that these measures violate Article II of GATT 1994.


Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 25 February 1997, the DSB established a panel in respect of the complaint WT/DS62. Japan, Korea, India and Singapore reserved their third-party rights. At its meeting on 20 March 1997, the DSB established a panel in respect of the complaints WT/DS67 and WT/DS68. In accordance with Article 9.1 of the DSU, the DSB agreed to establish a single panel to examine the complaints WT/DS62, WT/DS67 and WT/DS68.

The report of the Panel was circulated to Members on 5 February 1998. The Panel found that the EC failed to accord imports of LAN equipment from the US treatment no less favourable than that provided for in the EC Schedule of commitments, thereby acting inconsistently with Article II:1 of GATT 1994.

On 24 March 1998, the EC notified its intention to appeal certain issues of law and legal interpretations developed by the Panel. The report of the Appellate Body was circulated to Members on 5 June 1998. The Appellate Body reversed the Panel’s conclusion that the EC tariff treatment of LAN equipment is inconsistent with Article II:1 of GATT 1994.

At its meeting on 22 June 1998, the DSB adopted the Appellate Body report and the Panel report, as modified by the Appellate Body report.

image 160 pixels wide

Find all documents from this case
(Searches Documents Online, most recent documents appear on top)

quick help with downloading
> comprehensive help on Documents Online

all documents


Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.