> Otras diferencias en las que ha participado Sudáfrica
> Todas las diferencias que están actualmente en la fase de consultas


Since the WTO was established on 1 January 1995, its members have initiated disputes covering a variety of trade concerns, and developing and developed members have brought complaints in about equal numbers. While the majority of complaints have focused on WTO rules regarding subsidies and anti-dumping, members have also challenged various tariff regimes, food safety measures, commitments in services schedules, labelling and packaging rules, animal welfare measures, and environmental schemes. Of the 500 cases filed, just over half have reached the litigation stage, suggesting that the system's requirement for the members concerned to try to find a solution by consulting with each other helps to avoid many cases entering the litigation phase.

The 500th dispute was submitted on 10 November, when Pakistan filed a request for consultations with South Africa regarding South Africa's provisional anti-dumping duty on cement from Pakistan. The two sides will now consult with the aim of arriving at a mutually agreed solution.

A total of 300 disputes were brought under the dispute settlement system of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) — the predecessor to the WTO — over a period of 47 years. Although the GATT system worked reasonably well, the dispute settlement system introduced with the establishment of the WTO in 1995 was designed to ensure a more effective and reliable dispute settlement mechanism, including by requiring the automatic establishment of dispute panels following the second request by a WTO member and the adoption of dispute settlement reports unless all members decide otherwise. The WTO mechanism also introduced the possibility to appeal panel reports, a rare feature in international dispute settlement at the time.

“There is no doubt that the WTO dispute settlement system has served the membership extremely well,” said DG Azevêdo. “It is a system recognized the world over for providing fair, high quality results that respond to both developing and developed members.”

DG Azevêdo acknowledged however that “the success has brought challenges and while the system is still faster than most if not all international dispute settlement systems operating today, we are clearly in a situation where the high demand is testing our capacity”.

Disputes are generally much more complex and voluminous now than they were in the first decade of the WTO. As the jurisprudence has grown, so have the size and nature of parties' submissions and the length of panel and Appellate Body reports. The disputes of today are very different from those in the minds of the drafters of the dispute settlement rules, and appeals are not the rare occurrences members thought they would be. As a result, members and the WTO Secretariat will have to adjust to the new world of WTO dispute settlement.

 “We are allocating more resources to dispute settlement and are working with members to find solutions. I am confident that we can work together to ensure that the dispute settlement system continues to provide members with the highest possible level of service,” said the Director-General.

In the latest dispute, Pakistan filed a request for consultations with South Africa regarding South Africa's imposition of a provisional anti-dumping duty on Portland cement from Pakistan. The request was submitted to the WTO Secretariat on 10 November; further information will be available within the next few days in document WT/DS500/1

The request for consultations formally initiates a dispute in the WTO. Consultations give the parties an opportunity to discuss the matter and to find a satisfactory solution without proceeding further with litigation. After 60 days, if consultations have failed to resolve the dispute, the complainant may request adjudication by a panel.

Some figures about the how often WTO members have used the dispute settlement system:

Member  Complainant  Respondent
Antigua and Barbuda 1 0
Argentina 20 22
Armenia 0 1
Australia 7 15
Bangladesh 1 0
Belgium 0 3
Brazil 27 16
Canada 34 18
Chile 10 13
China 13 33
Colombia 5 4
Costa Rica 5 0
Croatia 0 1
Cuba 1 0
Czech Rep 1 2
Denmark 1 1
Dominican Republic 1 7
Ecuador 3 3
Egypt 0 4
El Salvador 1 0
European Communities 95 82
France 0 4
Germany 0 2
Greece 0 3
Guatemala 9 2
Honduras 8 0
Hong Kong,  China 1 0
Hungary 5 2
India 21 23
Indonesia 10 13
Ireland 0 3
Italy 0 1
Japan 21 15
Korea 17 15
Malaysia 1 1
Mexico 23 14
Moldova 1 1
Netherlands 0 3
New Zealand 9 0
Nicaragua 1 2
Norway 4 0
Pakistan 5 3
Panama 7 1
Peru 3 5
Philippines 5 6
Poland 3 1
Portugal 0 1
Romania 0 2
Russian Federation 4 6
Singapore 1 0
Slovak Rep 0 3
South Africa 0 5
Spain 0 3
Sri Lanka 1 0
Sweden 0 1
Switzerland 4 0
Chinese Taipei 6 0
Thailand 13 3
Trinidad &  Tobago 0 2
Turkey 2 9
Ukraine 4 3
United Kingdom 0 3
United States 108 124
Uruguay 1 1
Venezuela 1 2
Vietnam 3 0


Summary of disputes (as of 10 November 2015)

To date, 500 disputes have been brought to the WTO, of which:

  • 110 disputes have been resolved bilaterally or withdrawn
  • 282 disputes have proceeded to the litigation phase

For the remainder, no outcome has been notified to the WTO.

A total of 102 members have participated in a dispute either as a complainant or a respondent or as a third party. That means 63% of the membership has used the system.

The authorization for a member to retaliate once another member has been found to be in violation of its WTO obligations has been given 18 times, which means only 10% of the disputes have reached this outcome of last resort.

The compliance rate with dispute settlement rulings is very high, at around 90%

Servicio de noticias RSS

> Si tiene problemas para visualizar esta página,
sírvase ponerse en contacto con [email protected], y proporcionar detalles sobre el sistema operativo y el navegador que está utilizando.