 |
|
|
 |
ON THIS PAGE: Specific trade concerns China’s transitional review Transparency Next meeting |
 
|
WTO: 2007 NEWS ITEMS |
|
SEE ALSO: |
Members also conducted China’s “transitional review”, required annually for the first eight years under China’s membership agreement, and once more after about 10 years. And they looked ahead to a workshop on “Good Regulatory Practice” in March 2008.
EU’s REACH: The longest discussion continued to be on the EU’s Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH), covering the production and use of chemical substances, which took effect on 1 June 2007 after seven years of preparation and final approval in December 2006. It is being phased in over 11 years. REACH gives greater responsibility to industry to manage the risks from chemicals and to provide safety information on the substances (see box, and EU Commission website. Argentina joined a lengthening list of countries raising the issue. Among its concerns are: uncertainty about how the regulation works; its complexity and use of ambiguous terms; the possibility that the regulation will not be applied uniformly in all EU member states; the numerous bureaucratic steps required; the costs that have to be borne by exporters, producers and users even if they are not in the EU because of the onus shifted to industry; the requirement that only registered products can be sold. In particular, the regulation causes problems for small and medium-sized industries, Argentina said. Brazil, the US, Rep. of Korea, Australia, Japan, Canada, Chinese Taipei, Chile, China, Mexico and Thailand agreed, some of them saying the EU has not provided enough information. Some of them also reported that the issue had been discussed in Brussels when some members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group met the EU. The EU replied that the regulation has already been modified because of comments received during consultation periods. Although some information has not been notified to the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Committee, it is available on the Internet, the EU said. It also denied that the regulation discriminates against foreign companies because the same conditions apply to all, including small and medium-sized European companies, and it assured WTO members that the EU Commission is responsible for ensuring the regulation is applied uniformly all over the EU. Chemicals were also the subject of concerns raised about regulations on toxic substances:
Questioning countries argued that the risks have not been demonstrated scientifically and that the measures (or proposed measures) would hamper trade unnecessarily. Other concerns raised include: New concerns
Continuing concerns • Belgium’s and the Netherlands’ ban on
seal products (G/TBT/N/BEL/39 and G/TBT/N/NLD/68;
dispute DS369)— raised by
Norway As usual, the concerns were about alleged lack of scientific evidence or other justifications to back up the measures (e.g. on the harm caused by substances or the need for conservation), measures that are too burdensome because they would not meet the objectives even if the objectives are accepted (e.g. nutritional labelling), or lack of information. In one case, the EU declined to reply because the case (on seals) is now a WTO dispute, preferring to leave the discussion to the dispute itself.
China’s transitional review back to top Questions for this year’s transitional review came from Japan (G/TBT/W/278), the US (G/TBT/W/279) and EU (G/TBT/W/281). They covered a wide range of issues, one common to all of them being the issue of compulsory versus recommended standards. Although China insisted that recommended standards are not compulsory, all three questioners said their private sectors were reporting that apparently “recommended” standards were being treated as compulsory in practice. They asked China to clear up the confusion. See also China’s submission, document G/TBT/W/282.
Transparency back to top Notifications and exchanges of information and experience lie at the heart of the committee’s work. They allow governments to know what other governments are doing or planning and to discuss them, for example as specific trade concerns. Two events were organized immediately before this committee meeting, dealing with some aspects of transparency. Procedures for Information Exchange The fifth special meeting on this subject was held on 7–8 November, with a number of officials from capitals funded by the WTO so that they could attend. The meeting allowed officials responsible for exchanging information under the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement to discuss relevant issues at a technical level and to review how well notification is functioning and how enquiry points (officials assigned to answer questions on their government’s technical barriers to trade) are operating. Reporting to the committee afterwards, chairperson Raminder Sidhu said the two days of discussion showed that members have made significant advances in implementing the TBT Agreement’s provisions, but this could still be made more efficient. One proposal was for the committee to identify “best practices” for enquiry points, he said. Participants also said it is important for agencies within a government to cooperate, for example agencies dealing with standards and those handling regulations, he reported. “In fact, the workshop showed that transparency is very much a fundamental pillar [for] good regulatory practice — a theme that the committee will revert to in March next year,” he said. Statements on implementing the agreement The TBT Agreement (Article 15.2) requires governments to inform their fellow-members about how they are implementing the agreement. Since the agreement (and the WTO) came into being in 1995, 115 members have submitted at least one statement for the purpose, six of them since the last meeting in July, the chairperson reported. The day before the meeting, a workshop was organized to help members, in particular the 36 that have not made statements so far. The Secretariat reported that the workshop was well attended and looked at different approaches and experiences, including valuable presentations from developing countries such as Niger, Paraguay and Botswana, which have submitted statements. Again, one of the messages was the need for cooperation among various agencies and stakeholders within a country, the Secretariat said. This also helps to raise awareness about technical-barriers-to-trade issues, the committee was told. Information on both of these will soon be available on the TBT gateway page. Chairperson: Mr Raminder Sidhu of India
20 March 2008 (18-19 March: Workshop on Good Regulatory Practice)
|
> Problems viewing this page?
|
contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland
