Click here to return to homepage
../../../175pxls.gif (78 bytes)

 ON THIS PAGE:   Key facts   Summary of the dispute to date

home > trade topics > dispute settlement > the disputes >

Topics handled by WTO committees and agreements
Issues covered by the WTO’s committees and agreements

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS304

India — Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Certain Products from the European Communities


This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.

  

See also:
The basics: how disputes are settled in WTO
Computer based training on dispute settlement
Text of the Dispute Settlement Understanding


Key facts  back to top

Short title:

Complainant:

Respondent:

Third Parties:

Request for Consultations received:

 

Summary of the dispute to date  back to top

Summary up-to-date at

Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified

Complaint by the European Communities.

On 8 December 2003, the EC requested consultations with India concerning certain antidumping measures on imports of 27 products originating in the EC or EC member states.

According to the request for consultations from the EC, India violates its WTO obligations, inter alia, in that:

  • the determination of the effect of the dumped imports on prices does not seem to be based on positive evidence and on an objective examination;
     
  • the Indian investigating authority did not demonstrate that dumped imports were causing the alleged injury, and failed to examine other known factors and ensure that injury caused by those other factors was not attributed to dumping;
     
  • the Indian investigating authority did not properly inform interested parties of the relevant essential facts under consideration which formed the basis for the decision to apply the anti-dumping measures and in sufficient time for those parties to defend their interests;
     
  • the Indian investigating authority did not properly inform interested parties of the reasons why it did not accept evidence or information they had submitted within the investigation procedure;
     
  • the Indian investigating authority did not satisfy itself during the course of the investigation as to the accuracy of the information supplied by interested parties in particular by their domestic industry;
     
  • the public notice of information concluding the investigation did not contain all relevant information on the matters of fact and law and reasons which led to the imposition of the anti-dumping measures.

The EC considers that these Indian measures are inconsistent with: Article VI:1 of GATT 1994; Articles 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.5, 6.6, 6.8 (including Annex II), 6.9 and 12.2 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.

On 19 December 2003, Turkey and Chinese Taipei requested to join the consultations. On 22 January 2004, India accepted both requests.

image 160 pixels wide
  

Find all documents from this case
(Searches Documents Online, most recent documents appear on top)

quick help with downloading
> comprehensive help on Documents Online

all documents

  

Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.

contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland