Click here to return to homepage
../../../175pxls.gif (78 bytes)

 ON THIS PAGE:   Key facts   Summary of the dispute to date

home > trade topics > dispute settlement > the disputes >

Topics handled by WTO committees and agreements
Issues covered by the WTO’s committees and agreements

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS375

European Communities and its Member States — Tariff Treatment of Certain Information Technology Products


This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.

  

See also:
The basics: how disputes are settled in WTO
Computer based training on dispute settlement
Text of the Dispute Settlement Understanding


Key facts  back to top

Short title:

Complainant:

Respondent:

Third Parties:

Request for Consultations received:

  

Summary of the dispute to date  back to top

Summary up-to-date at

Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified

Complaint by the United States.

On 28 May 2008, the United States requested consultations with the European Communities and its member States with respect to their tariff treatment of certain information technology products.

The United States claims that the tariff treatment the European Communities and its member States accord to certain information technology products does not respect their commitments to provide duty-free treatment for these products under the Information Technology Agreement (ITA). According to the United States, the European Communities and its member States now impose duties on these products contrary to their scheduled duty-free tariff concessions arising from the ITA.

The United States asserts that a number of EC customs classification legal instruments, alone or in combination with Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, including all annexes thereto, as amended, appear to be inconsistent with the EC's and its member States' obligations under Article II:1(a) and II:1(b) of the GATT 1994 and their Schedules, and therefore nullify or impair benefits accruing to the United States under the GATT 1994.

The United States is also claiming that the publication of certain amended explanatory notes in the EC Official Journal after their application by its member States is inconsistent with the EC's obligations under Article X:1 and X:2 of the GATT 1994.

image 160 pixels wide
  

Find all documents from this case
(Searches Documents Online, most recent documents appear on top)

quick help with downloading
> comprehensive help on Documents Online

all documents

  

Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.

contact us : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland