DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

DS: China — Measures Concerning the Importation of Canola Seed from Canada

This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.

  

See also:

back to top

Current status

 

back to top

Key facts

 

back to top

Latest document

  

back to top

Summary of the dispute to date

The summary below was up-to-date at

Consultations

Complaint by Canada

On 9 September 2019, Canada requested consultations with China regarding the following two sets of measures allegedly affecting the importation of canola seed (intended for processing and consumption, not for planting) from Canada: (a) measures suspending the importation of canola seed from two Canadian companies; and (b) measures applying enhanced inspections on all imports of Canadian canola seed.

Canada claimed that the measures appear to be inconsistent with:

  • Articles 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.3, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 7, 8, paragraphs 1, 2, 5 and 6 of Annex B, and paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(e) and 1(g) of Annex C of the SPS Agreement;
      
  • Articles I:1, III:4, X:3(a), XI:1 of the GATT 1994; and
      
  • Articles 1.1, 5.1, 7.4.2 and 7.4.4 of the Trade Facilitation Agreement.

Canada also claimed that the measures appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Canada in the sense of Article XXIII:1(b) of the GATT 1994.

On 19 September 2019, the Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei requested to join the consultations.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

On 17 June 2021, Canada requested the establishment of a panel. At its meeting on 28 June 2021, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

At its meeting on 26 July 2021, the DSB established a panel. Australia, Brazil, the European Union, India, Japan, Norway, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the United States reserved their third-party rights.

On 24 September 2021, China and Canada informed the DSB that they had agreed to Procedures for Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU in this dispute. Such procedures were entered into by China and Canada to give effect to the communication JOB/DSB/1/Add.12 (“Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant To Article 25 Of The DSU (MPIA)”) and with the objective of setting a framework for an Arbitrator to decide on any appeal of any final panel report issued in this dispute, if the Appellate Body is not able to hear such an appeal under Articles 16.4 and 17 of the DSU.

 

Share


Follow this dispute

  

Problems viewing this page? If so, please contact [email protected] giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.