The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.

abandonment of action: see notice of appeal, requirements (AB/WP 20(2)), amendment; Working Procedures (appellate review), withdrawal of appeal (AB/WP 30)
 

abuse of discretion (panel), failure to make objective assessment (DSU 11) E.3.2
 

abuse of rights/abus de droit, pacta sunt servanda/performance in good faith (VC 26) P.3.1.1
 

act of State: see State responsibility
 

actionable/non-actionable subsidy (SCM) S.2.2.2
 

administrative instruments, right to challenge A.3.55.3, A.3.62.2, M.1.9, P.5.3.1
 

administrative, selling and general costs: see Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), determination of dumping (AD 2), calculation of administrative, selling and general costs and profits (AD 2.2.2)
 

admission of evidence: see evidence (panel procedures) (DSU 12)
 

adverse effects (SCM 5): see serious prejudice (SCM 5(c))
 

adverse inferences: see inferences from party’s refusal to provide information, panel’s right to draw
 

Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) (AG 1(a)/Annex 3)

Base Total AMS/commitment levels (AG 1(a)/Annex 3), absolute nature A.1.1.1

“constituent data and methodology”, beef, absence A.1.2.2

market price support (AG Annex 3, paragraph 8), “production eligible” A.1.35.1

“provisions of Annex 3” / “constituent data and methodology” (AG 1(a)(ii)), priority A.1.2.2
 

Agreement on Agriculture (AG): see also Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) (AG 1(a)/Annex 3); domestic support commitments (AG 6); domestic support measures, exemption from GATT XVI and SCM Part III measures (AG 13) (“due restraint” clause); payments on export of agricultural product financed by virtue of governmental action (AG 9.1(c))

export competition commitments (AG 8), compliance with both AG and Schedule of Commitments, need for A.1.14B.1-2, T.1.4

GATT 1994 and (AG 21.1) A.1.37, A.1.38.2, A.1.38.15, C.4.27

dispute settlement and A.1.37.2

market access concessions and commitments (AG 4.1) and A.1.8.2-3, A.1.37.2: see also market access (AG 4)

primacy of AG A.1.37.1, A.1.37.4, A.1.38.2, T.1.4.1

specific provisions in AG dealing with same matter, need for A.1.38.2-9

interpretation, guidelines

conformity with other Articles A.1.14.3

effectiveness principle A.1.10.2, A.1.14.3

object and purpose A.1.29B.1

consistency with object and purpose of Article 10, as a whole A.1.33A.4

preamble as evidence of A.1.5A.2

same or closely related phrases in different agreements A.1.4.2, A.1.32A.2

same or closely related phrases in same agreement A.1.5A.1, A.1.34D.3.1-2

text/plain language A.1.14B.1, A.1.17.3

wording and grammar, respect for A.1.9.1

interpretation, means

context

Article as a whole (Annex 2, para. 6) A.1.34D.2.6

SCM Agreement A.1.20.7, A.1.38.12, S.2.12.7

surrounding language A.1.14.3

treaty as a whole including annexes A.1.34C.5.1

preamble/chapeau of Article under discussion A.1.34C.2.5-6

market access (AG 4): see market access (AG 4)

Modalities Paper and A.1.37A

object and purpose

agricultural reform A.1.8.1

prevention of circumvention of export subsidy commitments (AG 10) A.1.33A.5

substantial progressive reductions in agricultural support and protection A.1.5A.3-4

Schedules of Commitments (AG 3) [and AG Annex 3], incorporation into AG 3 and 6 R.2.2.11

conformity with AG, need for A.1.14B.1-2, T.1.4.1

as integral part of GATT 1994 (AG 3.1) A.1.4A.1, A.1.37.4

primacy of AG (AG 21) A.1.6.3-4, T.1.4.1

SCM Agreement and: see also export subsidy, definition, “contingent upon export performance” (AG 1(e)/SCM 3.1(a)); subsidies, prohibited (SCM, Part II), “except as provided in the Agreement on Agriculture” (SCM 3.1(a)); subsidy, definition (SCM 1)

AG 6 and SCM 3.1(b) distinguished A.1.14A.2-3, I.3.7.10

primacy of AG (SCM 3.1) A.1.38.11-13

AG 13(c)(ii) and A.1.38.1

special safeguards (AG 5), c.i.f. import price (AG 5.1(b)) A.1.14.1, A.1.14.2

specific action against dumping (AD 18.1): see specific action against dumping (AD 18.1)
 

Agreement on Safeguards: see safeguard measures (Safeguards Agreement (SG)/GATT XIX (emergency action))
 

amicus curiae briefs A.2: see also standing/right to bring claim (DSU 3.7); third party rights

Additional Procedure (EC — Asbestos) A.2.3, W.2.2.1, W.2.6.6

adoption under AB/WP 16(1) A.2.3.1.1-2, W.2.6.6

failure to comply with Additional Procedure as ground for rejection A.2.3.5

time-limits A.2.3.4

request for views A.2.3.1, W.2.6.6

text A.2.3.1.2

NGO/private individual briefs A.2.1

arguments not addressed or adopted by participants or third parties A.2.1.13

discretionary power of panel to accept/reject A.2.1.2-12

conditions, panel’s right to attach A.2.1.4

consultation with parties A.2.1.4

as integral part of party’s submission A.2.1.1, A.2.1.11

party’s responsibility for A.2.1.1, A.2.1.11

WTO Member briefs A.2.2

discretionary power of AB to accept/reject A.2.2.1-7

interference with “fair, prompt and effective resolution of trade disputes” and A.2.2.6

rights as third party (DSU 10.2 and 17.4), relevance A.2.2.4
 

anti-circumvention action: see export subsidy commitments, prevention of circumvention (AG 10.1)
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), consultation and dispute settlement (AD 17): see also consultations (DSU 4)

GATT XXII and XXIII compared A.3.54.1, A.3.55.1-2, L.1.2

legal basis for consultation/claim (AD 17.3/AD 17.4)

good faith view of Member (“considers”) that benefits are being impaired or nullified (AD 17.3) A.3.55.4, L.1.7, P.3.1.12

identification of measure at issue (DSU 6.2) A.3.56.2, R.2.1.4

legislation as such A.3.54.1, A.3.55.2-3, A.3.56.6-8, J.2.1.10-11, L.1.2

administrative instrument A.3.55.3, A.3.62.2

“measure” (AD 17.4) A.3.55.4, A.3.56.2, A.3.56.8

acceptance of price undertakings A.3.56.2, L.1.6

definitive anti-dumping duties A.3.56, A.3.56.2

provisional measures A.3.56.2, L.1.6

“matter”, referral to DSB (AD 17.4) A.3.56.1, T.6.1.5: see also request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2); terms of reference of panels (DSU 7), “matter referred to the DSB”, as identified in DSU 6.2

identification of measure at issue, need for (DSU 6.2) A.3.56.2-5, R.2.1.5, R.2.3.8: see also request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2)

identification as anti-dumping duty, acceptance of price undertaking or provisional measure, need for R.2.3.3

request for establishment of panel, requirements (AD 17.5) and requirements for referral to DSB (DSU 6.2), consistency with requirements of A.3.57.1, R.2.1.5: see also request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2)

special or additional rule and procedure (DSU 1.2 and Appendix 2), whether A.3.55.1, S.5.1-4

standard/powers of review (AD 17.6): see Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), standard/powers of review (AD 17.6)
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), determination of dumping (AD 2)

calculation of administrative, selling and general costs and profits (AD 2.2.2): see also cost of production (AG), measurement

low volume sales, relevance (AD 2.2.2 chapeau) A.3.10

“weighted average” (AD 2.2.2(ii)) A.3.11.1-2

need for more than one exporter or producer A.3.11.1

sales not in the ordinary course of trade (“actual amounts incurred and realized”) A.3.11.2

calculation of dumping margins (AD 2.4)

actual product under investigation/type or model, distinction A.3.14.1, A.3.14.8-9

calculation of “all other” anti-dumping duty rate (AD 9.4), applicability to A.3.42.1

comparison of weighted average normal value with weighted average of all comparable export transactions A.3.14.2, A.3.14.7, A.3.14.9, A.3.42.1

“like product” / “comparable” equation A.3.14.3

multiple averaging (AD 2.4.2) A.3.14.6, A.3.14.9-11

product types/product as a whole (AD 2.4.2) A.3.60.5

method, right to choose, GATT VI:2 and A.3.14.4, A.3.65.8

“zeroing” A.3.14

negative differences and A.3.14.2, A.3.14.4

calculation of normal value, eligible transactions, requirements (AD 2.1)

affiliated party transactions A.3.5.2

comparability of price A.3.5.1

“like product” A.3.5.1

sale “destined for consumption in exporting country” A.3.5.1

sale “in ordinary course of trade” A.3.5.1

constituent elements A.3.61.8, S.2.36.4

intention of dumping, whether (AD 2/GATT VI:1) A.3.1.1, A.3.61.1, M.5.7

fair comparison (AD 2.4) A.3.6, A.3.12

affiliated party transactions A.3.6.1, A.3.12.1

“at same level of trade” requirement A.3.6.1, A.3.12.1

“for the purposes of this agreement” A.3.8.1

injurious effect on domestic industry, relevance (AD 2/GATT VI:1) A.3.1.1

methodology, Members’ freedom to choose consistently with AD A.3.51.1

“normal value … in the ordinary course of trade” (AD 2.1) A.3.3

comparing prices, relevant factors A.3.3.3

scrutiny, rules governing A.3.3.4

omission of “comparison”, relevance A.3.9A.1-2

period of investigation (POI)

discretionary selection of data from period within POI A.3.2.1

duration, absence of provision A.3.2.1

sales transaction not “in the ordinary course of trade”

affiliated party transactions A.3.4.1-2

distortion of normal value, Members’ discretion and A.3.4.2

sales above cost and A.3.9.1

“consider all available evidence on the proper allocation of costs” (AD 2.2.1.1)

“all available evidence” A.3.9A.2

“consider” A.3.9A.1-2

exclusion A.3.3.1-2, A.3.3.4

“reasonably reflect” the costs of production (AD 2.2.1.1) A.3.9B.1-2

sales below cost, method for determining whether (AD 2.2.1) A.3.4

alternative methods, possibility of A.3.9.1

transaction on terms and conditions incompatible with normal commercial practice A.3.3.2

weighted average (AD 2.2.2(ii)) and A.3.11.2

sunset review (AD 11.3), applicability to: see Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), sunset review (AD 11.3)
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), determination of injury (AD 3)

calculation of volume of dumped imports A.3.7

calculation of “all other” anti-dumping rate (AD 9.4), relevance A.3.44

method: see also “positive evidence” / “objective examination” requirement (AD 3.1) below

freedom to choose A.3.18.1-3

“positive evidence” / “objective examination” requirement (AD 3.1) A.3.7.1, A.3.18.1-3

AD 2.1, relevance A.3.7.1

AD 9.4, relevance A.3.44.1, A.3.44.3

AD 17.6(ii), relevance A.3.60.3-5

reference to as sufficient indication of legal basis of complaint (DSU 6.2) R.2.2.10

country by country analysis/cumulative assessment of volume and prices (AD 3.2) A.3.20

country by country analysis, whether necessary A.3.20.1, A.3.21.2

“positive evidence” / “objective examination” requirement (AD 3.1) A.3.21.1

rationale A.3.21.4

volume and prices as “effects” (AD 3.3) A.3.21.3

country by country analysis/cumulative assessment of volume and prices (AD 3.3), sunset reviews and: see Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), sunset review (AD 11.3), cumulative assessment of volume and prices (AD 3.3) and

evaluation of injury factors (AD 3.4) A.3.22, A.3.23

all relevant economic factors and indices, need to examine A.3.22.1-2

examination of other known factors (AD 3.5) A.3.25

dumping and injury analysis/causality analysis, distinguishability A.3.25.3-4

“known” to investigating authority A.3.25.1

“other than dumped imports” A.3.25.1

simultaneous injury to domestic industry, need for A.3.25.1

examination of relevance of factor not listed in AD 3.4, right to A.3.22.3

structure of domestic industry A.3.22.5

growth A.3.22.8

evaluation of other AD 3.4 factors and A.3.23.3-4

manner of evaluating causal relationship (AD 3.5)

absence of provision for/freedom of choice A.3.22.7, A.3.22.9, A.3.23, A.3.24.8, E.3.7

collective effect, whether examination required A.3.26

evaluation of factors known not to exist, relevance A.3.26.4

injurious effects of dumped goods and of other factors, need to distinguish (AD 3.5) A.3.24.3-7, A.3.26.1

non-attribution to dumped imports of injury caused by other factors (AD 3.5), A.3.24, A.3.26.3

Agreement on Safeguards (SG 4.2(b)) compared S.1.43

separate record of evaluation of each factor, whether required A.3.23.2

“objective examination” requirement (AD 3.1) A.3.22.4

sectoral analysis, right to A.3.22.3

“injury” (AD 3, Footnote 9) A.3.15A.1

applicability to AD as a whole A.3.52A.1

“positive evidence” / “objective examination” requirement (AD 3.1)

calculation of volume of dumped imports A.3.7.1, A.3.44.1, A.3.44.2

confidential evidence, admissibility A.3.16.2

country by country analysis/cumulative assessment of volume and prices (AD 3.2) A.3.21.1

“objective examination” A.3.17

evaluation of injury factors (AD 3.4) A.3.22.4

extrapolation of examined producer/exporter findings to non-examined producers/exporters (AD 6.10) A.3.19.3-6, S.2.27.1 Footnote 189

good faith/fairness and A.3.17.2

industry as a whole, need to examine A.3.17.3-4, A.3.22.6

proportional attribution between examined and non-examined producers/exporters A.3.19.5-6

“positive” A.3.16.3, A.3.17.1

in case of producers/exporters examined individually A.3.19.1

reference to as sufficient summary of legal basis of complaint (DSU 6.2) R.2.2.9

undisclosed evidence A.3.16.2

standard of review (AD 17.6(ii)), interpretation of relevant provisions of AD: see Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), standard/powers of review (AD 17.6)

substantive obligations as focus of AD 3 A.3.15.1

underlying principles (AD 3.1) A.3.15.1

sunset reviews and: see Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), sunset review (AD 11.3), applicability of AD 3 (determination of injury)

threat of material injury (AD 3.7) A.3.27

establishment “based on facts, not merely allegation, conjecture or remote possibility” A.3.27.1

a “clearly foreseen and imminent” change of circumstances, need for A.3.27.2

as responsibility of investigating authorities A.3.27.1
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), evidentiary rules (AD 6)

“ample opportunity to present in writing all evidence” (AD 6.1): see also due process below

extension “upon cause shown … whenever practicable” A.3.30.1, A.3.30.2, A.3.34.3

“reasonable period” (AD 6.8)/ “reasonable time” (Annex II, para. 1) and A.3.35.3

right to impose time-limits (AD 6.1.1) A.3.30

applicability

AD as whole A.3.29.1

sunset reviews (AD 11.4) A.3.53

cooperation, standard

allowance for/assistance with difficulties (AD 6.13) A.3.38.1, P.3.1.5

“best of its ability” (AD Annex VII, para. 5) A.3.36.2

good faith and P.3.1.5

disclosure to interested parties of information relevant for presentation of case (AD 6.4) A.3.31

“relevant” A.3.32.1-3

“used by the authorities” A.3.32.1-3

due process A.3.29.1

in case of failure to respond to notice of initiation A.3.31.3-6

in case of incomplete response to notice of initiation A.3.30.3-4

facts available to investigating authority, right to use (AD 6.8/Annex II) A.3.33

in case of partial lack of necessary information A.3.36.3, A.3.42.1

failure to submit necessary information “in timely fashion” (Annex II, para. 3) and A.3.34

interpretation in light of AD 6.1.1, 6.8/Annex II, para. 1 A.3.34.2-3, A.3.35.3

as “reasonable period” / “reasonable time” A.3.34.3

failure to submit necessary information “within reasonable period” (AD 6.8)/ “reasonable time” (Annex II, para. 1) and A.3.33.1-2

information provided within reasonable period, investigating authorities’ obligation to use A.3.34.2-3

“less favourable result” as possible consequence of failure to cooperate (AD Annex VII, para. 7) A.3.36.1-3, A.3.43.1

standard of cooperation expected A.3.36.1-2

“reasonable period”

balance between rights of investigating authorities and legitimate interests of parties A.3.35.2-3

flexibility A.3.35.1-2

relevant factors A.3.35.2

time-limits and A.3.35.3

full opportunity for defence of interests, right to (AD 6.2) A.3.30.2, A.3.31

disclosure obligation (AD 6.4) and A.3.31.1

notification of interest, right to set time-limits/deemed waiver A.3.31.5-6

individual examination of all producers, alternatives in case of impracticability (AD 6.10) A.3.37
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), GATT 1994 VI and

AD Agreement as agreement on implementation of GATT VI A.3.64.2

AD Agreement and GATT 1994 as integral part of WTO Agreement A.3.64.1

applicability of GATT VI as implying applicability of AD Agreement A.3.64.2

determination of dumping and calculation of dumping margin A.3.65.8

dumping, constituent elements (AD 2/GATT VI:1)

injurious effect on domestic industry A.3.65.1

intention of dumping A.3.1.1, A.3.61.1, A.3.65.1, M.5.7

“may levy” (GATT VI:2) as limitation to Member’s choice whether or not to impose anti-dumping duty (AD 9) A.3.65.2

scope of GATT VI as clarified by AD 18.1 (specific action against dumping) A.3.65.3-5
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), imposition and collection of anti-dumping duties (AD 9)

calculation of “all other” anti-dumping duty rate (AD 9.4) A.3.41

avoidance of prejudice to non-investigated exporters, failure to address A.3.43.2-3

calculation of volume of dumped imports (AD 3), relevance A.3.44

comparison of all comparable transactions (AD 2.4), need for A.3.42.1

as exception to AD 9.3 A.3.44.2

margins established under circumstances referred to in AD 6.8, exclusion A.3.41.1, A.3.42

method, absence of provision A.3.41.1

sunset review (AD 11.3), applicability to A.3.40.1

weighted average margin of dumping established with respect to investigated exporters as ceiling (AD 9.4(i)) A.3.41.1

zero/de minimis margins, exclusion A.3.14.10, A.3.41.1

“in respect of any product” (AD 9.2) A.3.40.1

sunset review (AD 11.3), applicability to A.3.40.1

prior determination of dumping margins, injury and causal link, need for (AD 9.1) A.3.39.1
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), investigation (AD 5): see investigation of dumping (AD 5)/subsidy (SCM 11)
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), obligation to ensure conformity with AD of domestic laws, regulations and administrative procedures (AD 18.4) A.3.62, L.1.7

dispute settlement procedures, applicability to A.3.62.1, L.1.8

“laws, regulations and administrative procedures” A.3.62.2-3, L.1.8, M.1.9

characterization by domestic authorities, relevance A.3.62.3, L.1.8

determination of legal status as by reference to WTO law A.3.62.3, L.1
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), standard/powers of review (AD 17.6)

assessment of the facts (AD 17.6(i)) A.3.57.2, A.3.58.2-4, A.3.59

active review, need for S.7.1.6

DSU 11 compared S.7.1.6

error, need to substantiate A.3.59.10

interpretation of relevant provisions of AD (AD 17.6(ii)) distinguished A.3.58.3, S.7.1.5

substitution of panel’s own assessment, exclusion A.3.58.5

“unbiased and objective” A.3.58.4-5, S.7.1.6

authorities’ establishment of facts (AD 17.6(i))

“establishment” A.3.59.1

“proper” A.3.58.4-5, A.3.59.1

determination of normative character of challenged “measure” A.3.62.4

discretionary powers A.3.59.9

“facts made available” (AD 17.5(ii))

disclosure/discernibility to interested parties by time of final determination, relevance A.3.57.3-4

examination to be based on A.3.57.3-4

limitation to A.3.59.5-7

requirement to seek information, whether A.3.59.8

interpretation of relevant provisions of AD (AD 17.6(ii)) A.3.22.2

in accordance with customary rules of interpretation of public international law A.3.60.2, A.3.60.4

“admits of more than one permissible interpretation” A.3.58.5, A.3.60

assessment of the facts (AD 17.6(i)) and, cumulative effect A.3.58.4

DSU 11 compared S.7.1.7

objective assessment, relevance A.3.60.3-4, S.7.1.7

non-applicability to covered agreements other than Anti-Dumping Agreement including the SCM and SPS Agreements A.3.58.1, A.3.63.1-2, S.7.1.1, S.7.1.2, S.7.1.4

parties’ obligations (AD 17.5/17.6), AD 3.1 (determination of injury) distinguished A.3.57.2, A.3.58.2
 

Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), sunset review (AD 11.3)

applicability of AD 2.1 (“dumping”) A.3.8, A.3.49.0, A.3.49.1

applicability of AD 2.4 (calculation of dumping margin) A.3.13.1, A.3.49.1-2: see also “likelihood” test, relevant factors, dumping margins below

applicability of AD 3 (determination of injury) A.3.52B.1-2

applicability of AD 9.4 (calculation of “all other” anti-dumping rate) A.3.40.1

continuation of duty

during review A.3.47A.2

as exception to mandatory rule A.3.45.1, A.3.47A.2

cumulative assessment of volume and prices (AD 3.3) and A.3.21.5, A.3.48A: see also Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD), determination of injury (AD 3), country by country analysis/cumulative assessment of volume and prices (AD 3.2)

applicability of AD 3.3 A.3.48A.3

initiation before expiry of five years from imposition of duty A.3.45.1

investigatory/adjudicatory functions A.3.47.1, A.3.52.3

parties’ obligations A.3.52.3

proactive role of investigating authorities A.3.47.1, A.3.48A.4, A.3.52.3

“likelihood” test

AD 6 provisions, applicability A.3.53.1-2

continuance or recurrence of dumping A.3.8.1, A.3.45.1, A.3.46

company-specific basis determination of likelihood A.3.40.1, A.3.50.1-4, A.3.52.8, A.3.53.2

continuance or recurrence of injury A.3.45.1, S.2.32

“injury” (AD 3, Footnote 9) A.3.52A.1

timeframe A.3.52C.1-2

“likelihood” A.3.47.2

AD 6 provisions, applicability A.3.53.1-2

overall determination as basis A.3.52A.3-4

“positive evidence” / “objective examination” requirement (AD 3.1) A.3.47.3-4, A.3.48A.4, A.3.52

absolute certainty, relevance E.3.10

assumptions, reliance on A.3.52.8

probability, need for A.3.40.1

relevant factors

dumping margins A.3.13.1, A.3.48.1-2, A.3.51.1-2: see also applicability of AD 2.4 (calculation of dumping margin) above

factors other than dumping margins/import volumes A.3.51.3, A.3.51.4

import volumes A.3.51.1-2

situation before and after anti-dumping duty order A.3.51.4

right to make A.3.51.1-2

methodology, absence of provision A.3.48.1, A.3.50.1, A.3.52A.2

parties’ rights

full opportunity for defence of interests A.3.47A.1

“interested party” (AD 11.2) A.3.50.1

notice of process A.3.47A.1

reasons for determination A.3.47A.1

SCM Agreement, sunset review (AD 21.3), identity of provisions A.3.63.3, I.3.3.1-2

time-limits (AD 11.4) A.3.47A.2

diligence, need for A.3.47A.2
 

appeal: see conditional appeal; notice of appeal, requirements (AB/WP 20(2))
 

appellate review (DSU 17): see also competence (AB); standard of review (DSU 11); Working Procedures (appellate review)

AB reports: see also panel reports

adoption by DSB (DSU 17.14) R.4.3.1

as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB. 5.2.1-2

panel’s reliance on S.8

extension of deadline for circulation W.2.10.2

legal issues and interpretations, limitation to (DSU 17.6) P.3.4.2

procedures: see notice of appeal, requirements (AB/WP 20(2)); Working Procedures (appellate review)
 

applicable law: see also interpretation of covered agreements, applicable law; municipal law; Working Procedures (panel) (DSU 12.1 and Appendix 3), applicable law

determination of dumping and calculation of dumping margins A.3.65.8

determination of serious injury or threat (SG 4) M.5.5, M.5.6, S.1.4.1, S.1.20.1-2

laws, regulations and administrative procedures (AD 18.4), determination of status as A.3.62.3, L.1.8

trademarks P.2.1.1, P.2.2.2
 

appropriate level of protection: see SPS Agreement, appropriate level of protection (SPS 5.5-5.6)
 

appropriateness: see proportionality
 

arguments: see claims and arguments; notice of appeal, requirements (AB/WP 20(2)); request for establishment of panel, requirements (DSU 6.2), legal basis of claim; standard of review (DSU 11), “objective assessment of matter before it”, all arguments, need to consider; standing/right to bring claim (DSU 3.7); third party rights
 

ATC (Agreement on Textiles and Clothing): see Textiles and Clothing Agreement (ATC), transitional safeguards (ATC 6)

Abbreviations used on this page