|

XXVIII. Article XXVI
back to top
A. Text of Article XXVI
Article XXVI: Acceptance, Entry into Force and Registration
1. The date of this Agreement shall be 30 October 1947.
2. This Agreement shall be open for acceptance by any contracting
party which, on 1 March 1955, was a contracting party or was negotiating
with a view to accession to this Agreement.
3. This Agreement, done in a single English original and a single
French original, both texts authentic, shall be deposited with the
Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall furnish certified
copies thereof to all interested governments.
4. Each government accepting this Agreement shall deposit an
instrument of acceptance with the Executive Secretary(5) to the
Contracting Parties, who will inform all interested governments of the
date of deposit of each instrument of acceptance and of the day on which
this Agreement enters into force under paragraph 6 of this
Article.
(footnote original)
5 By the Decision of 23 March 1965, the
CONTRACTING PARTIES changed the title of the head of the GATT
secretariat from “Executive Secretary” to “Director-General”.
5. (a)
Each government accepting this Agreement does so in
respect of its metropolitan territory and of the other territories for
which it has international responsibility, except such separate customs
territories as it shall notify to the Executive Secretary(5) to the
CONTRACTING PARTIES at the time of its own acceptance.
(b)
Any government, which has so notified the Executive Secretary(5) under the exceptions in
subparagraph (a) of this paragraph,
may at any time give notice to the Executive Secretary(5) that its
acceptance shall be effective in respect of any separate customs
territory or territories so excepted and such notice shall take effect
on the thirtieth day following the day on which it is received by the
Executive Secretary.(5)
(c)
If any of the customs territories, in respect of which a
contracting party has accepted this Agreement, possesses or acquires
full autonomy in the conduct of its external commercial relations and of
the other matters provided for in this Agreement, such territory shall,
upon sponsorship through a declaration by the responsible contracting
party establishing the above-mentioned fact, be deemed to be a
contracting party.
6. This Agreement shall enter into force, as among the governments
which have accepted it, on the thirtieth day following the day on which
instruments of acceptance have been deposited with the Executive
Secretary(6) to the Contracting Parties on behalf of governments named in
Annex H, the territories of which account for 85 per centum of the total
external trade of the territories of such governments, computed in
accordance with the applicable column of percentages set forth therein.
The instrument of acceptance of each other government shall take effect
on the thirtieth day following the day on which such instrument has been
deposited.
(footnote original)
6 By the Decision of 23 March 1965, the
CONTRACTING PARTIES changed the title of the head of the GATT
secretariat from “Executive Secretary” to “Director-General”.
7. The United Nations is authorized to effect registration of this
Agreement as soon as it enters into force.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXVI
1. Paragraph 1: “date of this Agreement”
1063. References to the “date of this Agreement” appear in
Articles II:1 (specifying the operative date for binding “other duties
and charges” with respect to items in schedules of concessions); II:6
(fixing the base date for par values of currencies, for application of
provisions on adjustment of specific duties in the event of a reduction
in par value); and in Articles
V:6, VII:4(d) and X:3(c) (permitting
retention of measures existing on “the date of this Agreement” with
respect to direct consignment requirements, currency conversion for
customs valuation purposes, or review of administrative action relating
to customs matters).
1064. On the “date of this Agreement” with respect to
Article
II:1 and the Understanding on Article
II:1(b), see above at paragraphs
153–157.
1065. Article XXVI:1 provides that “the date of this Agreement
shall be 30 October 1947.” This date applies for the obligations under
Article V:6 of the original contracting parties to the GATT 1947; the
former dependent territories of the original contracting parties which,
after attaining independence or commercial autonomy, succeeded to
contracting party status under Article
XXVI:5(c); and Chile. For
contracting parties that acceded in 1948–1951, the date used was 24
March 1948. For all accessions to the GATT 1947 thereafter, the
accession protocol provided that the “date of this Agreement” for
the purposes of Article V:6 was the date of the protocol of accession or
(where the acceding government had previously acceded provisionally) the
date of the protocol of provisional accession.(1487) These
accession protocol provisions are incorporated in the GATT 1994 by
virtue of paragraph 1(b)(ii) of the GATT 1994 incorporation text.
1066. Concerning GATT practice on “the date of this Agreement”.
2. Authentic texts
1067. Concerning the authentic texts of the GATT 1994 and GATT 1947,
see paragraphs 16–18 above.
3. Acceptance, entry into force, deposit and registration
1068. Regarding acceptance, entry into force, deposit and
registration of the WTO Agreement, see the material on the relevant
provisions of WTO Articles XIV and
XVI in the Chapter on the WTO
Agreement.
4. Practice under the GATT 1947 including provisional application
1069. Regarding GATT practice in respect of
Article XXVI.
1070. Regarding the provisional application of the GATT 1947 and the
termination thereof, see the GATT Analytical Index chapters on
Provisional Application of the General Agreement and on Institutions and
Procedure.
XXIX. Article XXVII
back to top
A. Text of Article XXVII
Article XXVII: Withholding or Withdrawal of Concessions
Any contracting party shall at any time be free to withhold or to
withdraw in whole or in part any concession, provided for in the
appropriate Schedule annexed to this Agreement, in respect of which such
contracting party determines that it was initially negotiated with a
government which has not become, or has ceased to be, a contracting
party. A contracting party taking such action shall notify the
CONTRACTING PARTIES and, upon request, consult with contracting parties
which have a substantial interest in the product concerned.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXVII
1. Withholding or withdrawal of concessions made in multilateral
trade negotiations
1071. Paragraph 4 of the Marrakesh Protocol provides:
“After the schedule annexed to this Protocol has become a Schedule
to GATT 1994 pursuant to the provisions of paragraph
1, such Member
shall be free at any time to withhold or to withdraw in whole or in part
the concession in such Schedule with respect to any product for which
the principal supplier is any other Uruguay Round participant the
schedule of which has not yet become a Schedule to GATT 1994. Such
action can, however, only be taken after written notice of any such
withholding or withdrawal of a concession has been given to the Council
for Trade in Goods and after consultations have been held, upon request,
with any Member, the relevant schedule relating to which has become a
Schedule to GATT 1994 and which has a substantial interest in the
product involved. Any concessions so withheld or withdrawn shall be
applied on and after the day on which the schedule of the Member which
has the principal supplying interest becomes a Schedule to the GATT
1994.”
1072. On GATT practice in respect of
Article XXVII.
XXX. Article XXVIII
back to top
A. Text of Article XXVIII
Article XXVIII*: Modification of Schedules
1. On the first day of each three-year period, the first period
beginning on 1 January 1958 (or on the first day of any other period*
that may be specified by the CONTRACTING PARTIES by two-thirds of the
votes cast) a contracting party (hereafter in this Article referred to
as the “applicant contracting party”) may, by negotiation and
agreement with any contracting party with which such concession was
initially negotiated and with any other contracting party determined by
the CONTRACTING PARTIES to have a principal supplying interest* (which
two preceding categories of contracting parties, together with the
applicant contracting party, are in this Article hereinafter referred to
as the “contracting parties primarily concerned”), and subject to
consultation with any other contracting party determined by the
CONTRACTING PARTIES to have a substantial interest* in such concession,
modify or withdraw a concession* included in the appropriate schedule
annexed to this Agreement.
2. In such negotiations and agreement, which may include provision
for compensatory adjustment with respect to other products, the
contracting parties concerned shall endeavour to maintain a general
level of reciprocal and mutually advantageous concessions not less
favourable to trade than that provided for in this Agreement prior to
such negotiations.
3. (a)
If agreement between the contracting parties primarily
concerned cannot be reached before 1 January 1958 or before the
expiration of a period envisaged in paragraph 1 of this
Article, the
contracting party which proposes to modify or withdraw the concession
shall, nevertheless, be free to do so and if such action is taken any
contracting party with which such concession was initially negotiated,
any contracting party determined under paragraph 1 to have a principal
supplying interest and any contracting party determined under paragraph 1
to have a substantial interest shall then be free not later than six
months after such action is taken, to withdraw, upon the expiration of
thirty days from the day on which written notice of such withdrawal is
received by the CONTRACTING PARTIES, substantially equivalent
concessions initially negotiated with the applicant contracting party.
(b)
If agreement between the contracting parties primarily
concerned is reached but any other contracting party determined under
paragraph 1 of this Article to have a substantial interest is not
satisfied, such other contracting party shall be free, not later than
six months after action under such agreement is taken, to withdraw, upon
the expiration of thirty days from the day on which written notice of
such withdrawal is received by the CONTRACTING PARTIES, substantially
equivalent concessions initially negotiated with the applicant
contracting party.
4. The CONTRACTING PARTIES may, at any time, in special
circumstances, authorize* a contracting party to enter into negotiations
for modification or withdrawal of a concession included in the
appropriate Schedule annexed to this Agreement subject to the following
procedures and conditions:
(a) Such negotiations* and any related consultations shall be
conducted in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 and
2 of
this Article.
(b) If agreement between the contracting parties primarily
concerned is reached in the negotiations, the provisions of paragraph 3
(b) of this Article shall apply.
(c) If agreement between the contracting parties primarily
concerned is not reached within a period of sixty days* after
negotiations have been authorized, or within such longer period as the
CONTRACTING PARTIES may have prescribed, the applicant contracting party
may refer the matter to the CONTRACTING PARTIES.
(d) Upon such reference, the CONTRACTING PARTIES shall
promptly examine the matter and submit their views to the contracting
parties primarily concerned with the aim of achieving a settlement. If a
settlement is reached, the provisions of paragraph 3 (b) shall apply as
if agreement between the contracting parties primarily concerned had
been reached. If no settlement is reached between the contracting
parties primarily concerned, the applicant contracting party shall be
free to modify or withdraw the concession, unless the CONTRACTING
PARTIES determine that the applicant contracting party has unreasonably
failed to offer adequate compensation.* If such action is taken, any
contracting party with which the concession was initially negotiated,
any contracting party determined under paragraph 4 (a) to have a
principal supplying interest and any contracting party determined under
paragraph 4 (a) to have a substantial interest, shall be free, not later
than six months after such action is taken, to modify or withdraw, upon
the expiration of thirty days from the day on which written notice of
such withdrawal is received by the CONTRACTING PARTIES, substantially
equivalent concessions initially negotiated with the applicant
contracting party.
5. Before 1 January 1958 and before the end of any period envisaged
in paragraph 1 a contracting party may elect by notifying the
CONTRACTING PARTIES to reserve the right, for the duration of the next
period, to modify the appropriate Schedule in accordance with the
procedures of paragraphs 1 to 3. If a contracting party so elects, other
contracting parties shall have the right, during the same period, to
modify or withdraw, in accordance with the same procedures, concessions
initially negotiated with that contracting party.
B. Text of Note Ad Article XXVIII
Ad Article XXVIII
The CONTRACTING PARTIES and each contracting party concerned should
arrange to conduct the negotiations and consultations with the greatest
possible secrecy in order to avoid premature disclosure of details of
prospective tariff changes. The CONTRACTING PARTIES shall be informed
immediately of all changes in national tariffs resulting from recourse
to this Article.
Paragraph 1
1. If the CONTRACTING PARTIES specify a period other than a
three-year period, a contracting party may act pursuant to paragraph 1
or paragraph 3 of Article XXVIII on the first day following the
expiration of such other period and, unless the CONTRACTING PARTIES have
again specified another period, subsequent periods will be three-year
periods following the expiration of such specified period.
2. The provision that on 1 January 1958, and on other days determined
pursuant to paragraph 1, a contracting party “may … modify or
withdraw a concession” means that on such day, and on the first day
after the end of each period, the legal obligation of such contracting
party under Article II is altered; it does not mean that the changes in
its customs tariff should necessarily be made effective on that day. If
a tariff change resulting from negotiations undertaken pursuant to this
Article is delayed, the entry into force of any compensatory concessions
may be similarly delayed.
3. Not earlier than six months, nor later than three months, prior to
1 January 1958, or to the termination date of any subsequent period, a
contracting party wishing to modify or withdraw any concession embodied
in the appropriate Schedule, should notify the CONTRACTING PARTIES to
this effect. The CONTRACTING PARTIES shall then determine the
contracting party or contracting parties with which the negotiations or
consultations referred to in paragraph 1 shall take place. Any
contracting party so determined shall participate in such negotiations
or consultations with the applicant contracting party with the aim of
reaching agreement before the end of the period. Any extension of the
assured life of the Schedules shall relate to the Schedules as modified
after such negotiations, in accordance with paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 of
Article XXVIII. If the CONTRACTING PARTIES are arranging for
multilateral tariff negotiations to take place within the period of six
months before 1 January 1958, or before any other day determined
pursuant to paragraph 1, they shall include in the arrangements for such
negotiations suitable procedures for carrying out the negotiations
referred to in this paragraph.
4. The object of providing for the participation in the negotiation
of any contracting party with a principle supplying interest, in
addition to any contracting party with which the concession was
originally negotiated, is to ensure that a contracting party with a
larger share in the trade affected by the concession than a contracting
party with which the concession was originally negotiated shall have an
effective opportunity to protect the contractual right which it enjoys
under this Agreement. On the other hand, it is not intended that the
scope of the negotiations should be such as to make negotiations and
agreement under Article XXVIII unduly difficult nor to create
complications in the application of this Article in the future to
concessions which result from negotiations there under. Accordingly, the
CONTRACTING PARTIES should only determine that a contracting party has a
principal supplying interest if that contracting party has had, over a
reasonable period of time prior to the negotiations, a larger share in
the market of the applicant contracting party than a contracting party
with which the concession was initially negotiated or would, in the
judgement of the CONTRACTING PARTIES, have had such a share in the
absence of discriminatory quantitative restrictions maintained by the
applicant contracting party. It would therefore not be appropriate for
the CONTRACTING PARTIES to determine that more than one contracting
party, or in those exceptional cases where there is near equality more
than two contracting parties, had a principal supplying interest.
5. Notwithstanding the definition of a principal supplying interest
in note 4 to paragraph 1, the CONTRACTING PARTIES may exceptionally
determine that a contracting party has a principal supplying interest if
the concession in question affects trade which constitutes a major part
of the total exports of such contracting party.
6. It is not intended that provision for participation in the
negotiations of any contracting party with a principal supplying
interest, and for consultation with any contracting party having a
substantial interest in the concession which the applicant contracting
party is seeking to modify or withdraw, should have the effect that it
should have to pay compensation or suffer retaliation greater than the
withdrawal or modification sought, judged in the light of the conditions
of trade at the time of the proposed withdrawal or modification, making
allowance for any discriminatory quantitative restrictions maintained by
the applicant contracting party.
7. The expression “substantial interest” is not capable of a
precise definition and accordingly may present difficulties for the
CONTRACTING PARTIES. It is, however, intended to be construed to cover
only those contracting parties which have, or in the absence of
discriminatory quantitative restrictions affecting their exports could
reasonably be expected to have, a significant share in the market of the
contracting party seeking to modify or withdraw the concession.
Paragraph 4
1. Any request for authorization to enter into negotiations shall be
accompanied by all relevant statistical and other data. A decision on
such request shall be made within thirty days of its submission.
2. It is recognized that to permit certain contracting parties,
depending in large measure on a relatively small number of primary
commodities and relying on the tariff as an important aid for furthering
diversification of their economies or as an important source of revenue,
normally to negotiate for the modification or withdrawal of concessions
only under paragraph 1 of Article XXVIII, might cause them at such time
to make modifications or withdrawals which in the long run would prove
unnecessary. To avoid such a situation the CONTRACTING PARTIES shall
authorize any such contracting party, under paragraph
4, to enter into
negotiations unless they consider this would result in, or contribute
substantially towards, such an increase in tariff levels as to threaten
the stability of the Schedules to this Agreement or lead to undue
disturbance of international trade.
3. It is expected that negotiations authorized under
paragraph 4 for
modification or withdrawal of a single item, or a very small group of
items, could normally be brought to a conclusion in sixty days. It is
recognized, however, that such a period will be inadequate for cases
involving negotiations for the modification or withdrawal of a larger
number of items and in such cases, therefore, it would be appropriate
for the CONTRACTING PARTIES to prescribe a longer period.
4. The determination referred to in
paragraph 4 (d) shall be
made by the CONTRACTING PARTIES within thirty days of the submission of
the matter to them unless the applicant contracting party agrees to a
longer period.
5. In determining under paragraph 4 (d)
whether an applicant
contracting party has unreasonably failed to offer adequate
compensation, it is understood that the CONTRACTING PARTIES will take
due account of the special position of a contracting party which has
bound a high proportion of its tariffs at very low rates of duty and to
this extent has less scope than other contracting parties to make
compensatory adjustment.
C. Understanding on the Interpretation of Article XXVII of the
General Agreement an Tariffs and Trade 1994
Members hereby agree as follows:
1. For the purposes of modification or withdrawal of a concession,
the Member which has the highest ratio of exports affected by the
concession (i.e. exports of the product to the market of the Member
modifying or withdrawing the concession) to its total exports shall be
deemed to have a principal supplying interest if it does not already
have an initial negotiating right or a principal supplying interest as
provided for in paragraph 1 of Article XXVIII. It is however agreed that
this paragraph will be reviewed by the Council for Trade in Goods five
years from the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement with a view
to deciding whether this criterion has worked satisfactorily in securing
a redistribution of negotiating rights in favour of small and
medium-sized exporting Members. If this is not the case, consideration
will be given to possible improvements, including, in the light of the
availability of adequate data, the adoption of a criterion based on the
ratio of exports affected by the concession to exports to all markets of
the product in question.
2. Where a Member considers that it has a principal supplying
interest in terms of paragraph 1, it should communicate its claim in
writing, with supporting evidence, to the Member proposing to modify or
withdraw a concession, and at the same time inform the Secretariat.
Paragraph 4 of the “Procedures for Negotiations under Article XXVIII”
adopted on 10 November 1980 (BISD 27S/26–28) shall apply in these
cases.
3. In the determination of which Members have a principal supplying
interest (whether as provided for in paragraph 1 above or in
paragraph 1
of Article XXVIII) or substantial interest, only trade in the affected
product which has taken place on an MFN basis shall be taken into
consideration. However, trade in the affected product which has taken
place under non-contractual preferences shall also be taken into account
if the trade in question has ceased to benefit from such preferential
treatment, thus becoming MFN trade, at the time of the negotiation for
the modification or withdrawal of the concession, or will do so by the
conclusion of that negotiation.
4. When a tariff concession is modified or withdrawn on a new product
(i.e. a product for which three years’ trade statistics are not
available) the Member possessing initial negotiating rights on the
tariff line where the product is or was formerly classified shall be
deemed to have an initial negotiating right in the concession in
question. The determination of principal supplying and substantial
interests and the calculation of compensation shall take into account, inter
alia, production capacity and investment in the affected product in the exporting Member and
estimates of export growth, as well as forecasts of demand for the
product in the importing Member. For the purposes of this paragraph, “new
product” is understood to include a tariff item created by means of a
breakout from an existing tariff line.
5. Where a Member considers that it has a principal supplying or a
substantial interest in terms of paragraph 4, it should communicate its
claim in writing, with supporting evidence, to the Member proposing to
modify or withdraw a concession, and at the same time inform the
Secretariat. Paragraph 4 of the above-mentioned “Procedures for
Negotiations under Article XXVIII” shall apply in these cases.
6. When an unlimited tariff concession is replaced by a tariff rate
quota, the amount of compensation provided should exceed the amount of
the trade actually affected by the modification of the concession. The
basis for the calculation of compensation should be the amount by which
future trade prospects exceed the level of the quota. It is understood
that the calculation of future trade prospects should be based on the
greater of:
(a) the average annual trade in the most recent representative
three-year period, increased by the average annual growth rate of
imports in that same period, or by 10 per cent, whichever is the
greater; or
(b) trade in the most recent year increased by 10 per cent.
In no case shall a Member’s liability for compensation exceed that
which would be entailed by complete withdrawal of the concession.
7. Any Member having a principal supplying interest, whether as
provided for in paragraph 1 above or in paragraph 1 of Article
XXVIII,
in a concession which is modified or withdrawn shall be accorded an
initial negotiating right in the compensatory concessions, unless
another form of compensation is agreed by the Members concerned.
D. Interpretation and Application of Article XXVIII
1. Legal relevance of Article XXVIII negotiations in interpretation
of GATT Articles
1073. In EC — Poultry, Brazil claimed that the MFN principle
in Articles I and XIII did not apply to
tariff-rate quotas resulting from
compensation negotiations under Article XXVIII of the
GATT. The Panel
rejected this argument and held:
“[I]f a preferential treatment of a particular trading partner not
elsewhere justified is permitted under the pretext of ‘compensatory
adjustment’ under Article XXVIII:2, it would create a serious loophole
in the multilateral trading system. Such a result would fundamentally
alter the overall balance of concessions Article XXVIII is designed to
achieve.”(1488)
1074. The Panel concluded that a tariff-rate quota which resulted
from negotiations under Article XXVIII of the GATT
1947, and which was
incorporated into a Member’s Uruguay Round Schedule, must be
administered in a non-discriminatory manner consistent with Article XIII
of the GATT 1994.(1489) The Appellate Body agreed:
“We see nothing in Article XXVIII to suggest that compensation
negotiated within its framework may be exempt from compliance with the
non-discrimination principle inscribed in Articles I and
XIII of the
GATT 1994. As the Panel observed, this interpretation is, furthermore,
supported by the negotiating history of Article XXVIII. Regarding the
provision which eventually became Article
XXVIII:3, the Chairman of the
Tariff Agreements Committee at Geneva in 1947, concluded:
‘It was agreed that there was no intention to interfere in any way
with the operation of the most-favoured-nation clause. This Article is
headed ‘Modification of Schedules’. It refers throughout to
concessions negotiated under paragraph 1 of Article
II, the Schedules,
and there is no reference to Article
I, which is the Most-Favoured-Nation
Clause. Therefore, I think the intent is clear: that in no way should
this Article interfere with the operation of the Most-Favoured-Nation
Clause.’(1490)
Although this statement refers specifically to the MFN clause in
Article I of the GATT, logic requires that it applies equally to the
non-discriminatory administration of quotas and tariff-rate quotas under
Article XIII of the GATT 1994.”(1491)
2. Article XXVIII:2: “general level of … concessions not less
favourable to trade”
1075. In Brazil — Poultry, the Panel observed regarding the
possibility of negotiating discriminatory tariff rate quotas as
compensation under Article XXVIII:
“ … In view of the EC’s obligations under Article XXVIII:2 to
‘maintain a general level of reciprocal and mutually advantageous
concessions not less favourable to trade than that provided for’ in
its previous tariff schedule, compensation for the withdrawal or
modification of MFN commitments should be given in an MFN manner also.
If a preferential treatment of a particular trading partner not
elsewhere justified is permitted under the pretext of ‘compensatory
adjustment’ under Article XXVIII:2, it would create a serious loophole
in the multilateral trading system. Such a result would fundamentally
alter the overall balance of concessions Article XXVIII is designed to
achieve.”(1492)
3. Review of the Understanding on the Interpretation of Article
XXVIII of the GATT 1994
1076. On 24 January 2000, the Council for Trade in Goods requested
the Committee on Market Access to conduct the review envisaged in
paragraph 1 of the Understanding on the Interpretation of Article XXVIII
of the GATT 1994.(1493) On 12 October 2000, the Committee on
Market Access agreed to report to the Council for Trade in Goods that
the review had been carried out as mandated by that body and that, at
that stage, there was no basis to change the criterion contained in
paragraph 1 of the aforementioned Understanding, with a reservation that
in the future any Member would be free to raise this matter when
necessary.(1494)
4. Renegotiation of concessions under Article XXVIII
1077. Regarding the history of tariff renegotiations under the GATT
1947. Although
the early practice makes it difficult to determine the exact number of
renegotiations that took place under the GATT 1947, the Secretariat’s
records show that at least 42 GATT contracting parties initiated roughly
300 renegotiations between 1951 and 1994.(1495)
1078. The Procedures for Negotiations under
Article XXVIII, adopted
by the GATT 1947 Council on 10 November 1980,(1496) govern
renegotiation of concessions under the WTO. These procedures provide for
a Member undertaking GATT Article XXVIII negotiations to submit to the
Secretariat: (i) a report and a joint letter upon completion of each
bilateral negotiation and (ii) a final report upon completion of all its
bilateral negotiations.
1079. According to a Secretariat Note on the Situation of Schedules
of WTO Members, in practice, only 19 final reports were received by the
Secretariat for the 79 renegotiations initiated between 1981 and 1994.
The status recorded by the Secretariat for renegotiations lacking a
final report is diverse — in a few cases the invocation of
Article XXVIII was withdrawn, in others the renegotiating party
submitted partial information on bilateral agreements reached, and in
many cases, the Secretariat received no further information after
initiation of the renegotiation. Only a few GATT 1947 renegotiations
under
Article XXVIII were formally carried over into the WTO. It remains
unclear for the majority of these GATT 1947 renegotiations whether they
were: (i) concluded with the relevant contracting parties and their
results incorporated into a Schedule annexed to the Marrakesh Protocol
to the GATT 1994, (ii) concluded, with the results overridden by the
Schedule annexed to the Marrakesh Protocol, (iii) concluded with all the
relevant contracting parties, but never reported or included in a
Schedule, or (iv) never concluded and still ongoing.
1080. As of May 2011, there had been 35 requests to enter into
renegotiations under GATT
Article XXVIII since 1 January 1995. Of these,
4 had been withdrawn, 11 had been concluded and formally certified, 5
had been concluded, but not certified, and 15 were in principle ongoing.(1497)
1081. The Secretariat Note on the Situation of Schedules of WTO
Members provides a table including information and document references
regarding renegotiations under
Article XXVIII since 1981 (including
renegotiations held under
Article XXVIII by virtue of Article
XXIV:6).(1498)
1082. Regarding renegotiation of concessions consequent to
implementation of the HS nomenclature in Schedules, or implementation of
amendments to the HS nomenclature, see the discussion of the Harmonized
System under Chapter II.
5. Time-limits for invocation of Article XXVIII:3 (including
application in the context of Article XXIV:6)
1083. On a series of occasions since 2004, the Council on Trade in
Goods has agreed to extend the deadline for compensatory withdrawals
under Article XXVIII:3 in respect of ongoing
Article XXVIII renegotiations consequent to the 2004 enlargement of the EU. The action
by the Goods Council has responded to a communication from the EU,
requesting such an extension, and stating that the EU “will not assert
that WTO Members who have submitted a claim pursuant to Article XXIV:6
of GATT 1994 are precluded from withdrawing substantially equivalent
concessions under Article XXVIII:3 of GATT 1994 because this withdrawal
occurs later than six months after the EU’s withdrawal of concessions,
provided that the claiming WTO Member withdraws concessions no later
than [six months after the expiry of the extension”. A similar series
of extensions to the deadline under Article XXVIII:3 has been agreed in
respect of negotiations consequent to the EU’s 2007 enlargement.(1499)
6. Notifications submitted under Article XXVIII:5
1084. A total of 32 Members (counting the EU as one Member), as well
as the Netherlands on behalf of Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles, and
Denmark on behalf of Greenland, submitted notifications under Article
XXVIII:5 reserving the right to modify their schedules during the
three-year period commencing 1 January 2009.
7. GATT practice under Article XXVIII
1085. See GATT Analytical Index.
XXXI. Article XXVIII bis
back to top
A. Text of Article XXVIII bis
Article XXVIII bis: Tariff Negotiations
1. The contracting parties recognize that customs duties often
constitute serious obstacles to trade; thus negotiations on a reciprocal
and mutually advantageous basis, directed to the substantial reduction
of the general level of tariffs and other charges on imports and exports
and in particular to the reduction of such high tariffs as discourage
the importation even of minimum quantities, and conducted with due
regard to the objectives of this Agreement and the varying needs of
individual contracting parties, are of great importance to the expansion
of international trade. The CONTRACTING PARTIES may therefore sponsor
such negotiations from time to time.
2. (a)
Negotiations under this Article may be carried out on a
selective product-by-product basis or by the application of such
multilateral procedures as may be accepted by the contracting parties
concerned. Such negotiations may be directed towards the reduction of
duties, the binding of duties at then existing levels or undertakings
that individual duties or the average duties on specified categories of
products shall not exceed specified levels. The binding against increase
of low duties or of duty-free treatment shall, in principle, be
recognized as a concession equivalent in value to the reduction of high
duties.
(b) The contracting parties recognize that in general the
success of multilateral negotiations would depend on the participation
of all contracting parties which conduct a substantial proportion of
their external trade with one another.
3. Negotiations shall be conducted on a basis which affords adequate
opportunity to take into account:
(a) the needs of individual contracting parties and individual
industries;
(b) the needs of less-developed countries for a more flexible use of
tariff protection to assist their economic development and the special
needs of these countries to maintain tariffs for revenue purposes; and
(c) all other relevant circumstances, including the fiscal,*
developmental, strategic and other needs of the contracting parties
concerned.
B. Text of Note Ad Article XXVIII bis
Ad Article XXVIII bis: Paragraph 3
It is understood that the reference to fiscal needs would include the
revenues aspect of duties and particularly duties imposed primarily for
revenue purpose, or duties imposed on products which can be substituted
for products subject to revenue duties to prevent the avoidance of such
duties.
C. Interpretation and Application of Article XXVIII bis
1. Tariff Negotiations
1086. Paragraph 16 of the Doha Declaration, adopted by Ministers on
14 November 2001, refers to Article XXVIII bis as follows:
We agree to negotiations which shall aim, by modalities to be agreed,
to reduce or as appropriate eliminate tariffs, including the reduction
or elimination of tariff peaks, high tariffs, and tariff escalation, as
well as non-tariff barriers, in particular on products of export interest
to developing countries. Product coverage shall be comprehensive and
without a priori exclusions. The negotiations shall take fully into
account the special needs and interests of developing and
least-developed country participants, including through less than full
reciprocity in reduction commitments, in accordance with the relevant
provisions of Article XXVIII bis of GATT 1994 and the provisions
cited in paragraph 50 below. To this end, the modalities to be agreed
will include appropriate studies and capacity-building measures to
assist least-developed countries to participate effectively in the
negotiations.(1500)
1087. See also GATT Analytical Index.
XXXII. Article XXIX
back to top
A. Text of Article XXIX
Article XXIX: The Relation of this Agreement to the Havana Charter
1. The contracting parties undertake to observe to the fullest extent
of their executive authority the general principles of Chapters I to VI
inclusive and of Chapter IX of the Havana Charter pending their
acceptance of it in accordance with their constitutional procedures.*
2.
Part II of this Agreement shall be suspended on the day on which
the Havana Charter enters into force.
3. If by September 30, 1949, the Havana Charter has not entered into
force, the contracting parties shall meet before December 31, 1949, to
agree whether this Agreement shall be amended, supplemented or
maintained.
4. If at any time the Havana Charter should cease to be in force, the
CONTRACTING PARTIES shall meet as soon as practicable thereafter to
agree whether this Agreement shall be supplemented, amended or
maintained. Pending such agreement, Part II of this Agreement shall
again enter into force; Provided that the provisions of Part II
other than Article XXIII shall be replaced, mutatis mutandis, in
the form in which they then appeared in the Havana Charter; and Provided
further that no contracting party shall be bound by any provisions which
did not bind it at the time when the Havana Charter ceased to be in
force.
5. If any contracting party has not accepted the Havana Charter by
the date upon which it enters into force, the CONTRACTING PARTIES shall
confer to agree whether, and if so in what way, this Agreement in so far
as it affects relations between such contracting party and other
contracting parties, shall be supplemented or amended. Pending such
agreement the provisions of Part II of this Agreement shall,
notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 of this
Article, continue
to apply as between such contracting party and other contracting
parties.
6. Contracting parties which are Members of the International Trade
Organization shall not invoke the provisions of this Agreement so as to
prevent the operation of any provision of the Havana Charter. The
application of the principle underlying this paragraph to any
contracting party which is not a Member of the International Trade
Organization shall be the subject of an agreement pursuant to paragraph
5 of this Article.
B. Text of Note Ad Article XXIX
Ad Article XXIX: Paragraph 1
Chapters VII and VIII of the Havana Charter have been excluded from
paragraph 1 because they generally deal with the organization, functions
and procedures of the International Trade Organization.
C. Interpretation and Application of Article XXIX
1088. See GATT Analytical Index.
XXXIII. Article XXX
back to top
A. Text of Article XXX
Article XXX: Amendments
1. Except where provision for modification is made elsewhere in this
Agreement, amendments to the provisions of Part I of this Agreement or
the provisions of Article XXIX or of this Article shall become effective
upon acceptance by all the contracting parties, and other amendments to
this Agreement shall become effective, in respect of those contracting
parties which accept them, upon acceptance by two-thirds of the
contracting parties and thereafter for each other contracting party upon
acceptance by it.
2. Any contracting party accepting an amendment to this Agreement
shall deposit an instrument of acceptance with the Secretary-General of
the United Nations within such period as the CONTRACTING PARTIES may
specify. The CONTRACTING PARTIES may decide that any amendment made
effective under this Article is of such a nature that any contracting
party which has not accepted it within a period specified by the
CONTRACTING PARTIES shall be free to withdraw from this Agreement, or to
remain a contracting party with the consent of the CONTRACTING PARTIES.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXX
1089. Concerning
amendments to the WTO Agreement, see the material on WTO Article X in
the Chapter on the WTO Agreement.
XXXIV. Article XXXI
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXI
Article XXXI: Withdrawal
Without prejudice to the provisions of
paragraph 12 of Article XVIII,
of Article XXIII or of paragraph 2 of Article
XXX, any contracting party
may withdraw from this Agreement, or may separately withdraw on behalf
of any of the separate customs territories for which it has
international responsibility and which at the time possesses full
autonomy in the conduct of its external commercial relations and of the
other matters provided for in this Agreement. The withdrawal shall take
effect upon the expiration of six months from the day on which written
notice of withdrawal is received by the Secretary-General of the United
Nations.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXI
1090. Concerning
withdrawal from the WTO, see the material on WTO Article XV in the
Chapter on the WTO Agreement.
XXXV. Article XXXII
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXII
Article XXXII: Contracting Parties
1. The contracting parties to this Agreement shall be understood to
mean those governments which are applying the provisions of this
Agreement under Articles XXVI or XXXIII or pursuant to the Protocol of
Provisional Application.
2. At any time after the entry into force of this Agreement pursuant
to paragraph 6 of Article XXVI, those contracting parties which have
accepted this Agreement pursuant to paragraph 4 of Article XXVI may
decide that any contracting party which has not so accepted it shall
cease to be a contracting party.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXII
1091. Concerning membership in the WTO, see the material on
WTO
Article XI in the Chapter on the WTO. Concerning GATT practice in
respect of Article XXXII.
XXXVI. Article XXXIII
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXIII
Article XXXIII: Accession
A government not party to this Agreement, or a government acting on
behalf of a separate customs territory possessing full autonomy in the
conduct of its external commercial relations and of the other matters
provided for in this Agreement, may accede to this Agreement, on its own
behalf or on behalf of that territory, on terms to be agreed between
such government and the CONTRACTING PARTIES. Decisions of the
CONTRACTING PARTIES under this paragraph shall be taken by a two-thirds
majority.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXIII
1092. Regarding WTO accession, see the material on
WTO Article XII in
the Chapter on the WTO Agreement. Regarding GATT practice on accession.
XXXVII. Article XXXIV
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXIV
Article XXXIV: Annexes
The annexes to this Agreement are hereby made an integral part of
this Agreement.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXIV
1093. Article XXXIV pertains to the Annexes to the GATT: Annexes A
through F concerning the historical preferences dealt with by Article
1:2; Annex G relating to the application of the limits on historical
preferences imposed by Article
I:4; Annex H specifying shares of trade
for the purposes of Article XXVI:6 on definitive entry into force of the
GATT 1947; and Annex I, comprising the Notes and Supplementary
Provisions to the GATT 1947 (“Ad Notes”) agreed as part of
the 30 October 1947 text of the GATT 1947 and later amendments regarding practice under the GATT 1947
in respect of Article XXXIV. Concerning the “Ad Notes”, see
the relevant sections of this Chapter.
XXXVIII. Article XXXV
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXV
Article XXXV: Non-application of the Agreement between
Particular
Contracting Parties
1. This Agreement, or alternatively
Article II of this Agreement,
shall not apply as between any contracting party and any other
contracting party if:
(a) the two contracting parties have not entered into tariff
negotiations with each other, and
(b) either of the contracting parties, at the time either
becomes a contracting party, does not consent to such application.
2. The CONTRACTING PARTIES may review the operation of this Article
in particular cases at the request of any contracting party and make
appropriate recommendations.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXV
1094. Concerning non-application of the GATT
1947, which includes a table of
invocations and disinvocations of Article XXXV during the GATT 1947
period.
1095. Concerning non-application of the Multilateral Trade Agreements
between particular Members, see Chapter on the WTO Agreement, under
Article XIII.
Part IV*: Trade and Development
XXXIX. Article XXXVI
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXVI
Article XXXVI: Principles and Objectives
1.* The contracting parties,
(a) recalling that the basic objectives of this Agreement
include the raising of standards of living and the progressive
development of the economies of all contracting parties, and considering
that the attainment of these objectives is particularly urgent for
less-developed contracting parties;
(b) considering that export earnings of the less-developed
contracting parties can play a vital part in their economic development
and that the extent of this contribution depends on the prices paid by
the less-developed contracting parties for essential imports, the volume
of their exports, and the prices received for these exports;
(c) noting, that there is a wide gap between standards of
living in less-developed countries and in other countries;
(d) recognizing that individual and joint action is essential
to further the development of the economies of less-developed
contracting parties and to bring about a rapid advance in the standards
of living in these countries;
(e) recognizing that international trade as a means of
achieving economic and social advancement should be governed by such
rules and procedures — and measures in conformity with such
rules and procedures — as are consistent with the objectives
set forth in this Article;
(f) noting that the CONTRACTING PARTIES may enable
less-developed contracting parties to use special measures to promote
their trade and development;
agree as follows.
2. There is need for a rapid and sustained expansion of the export
earnings of the less-developed contracting parties.
3. There is need for positive efforts designed to ensure that
less-developed contracting parties secure a share in the growth in
international trade commensurate with the needs of their economic
development.
4. Given the continued dependence of many less-developed contracting
parties on the exportation of a limited range of primary products,*
there is need to provide in the largest possible measure more favourable
and acceptable conditions of access to world markets for these products,
and wherever appropriate to devise measures designed to stabilize and
improve conditions of world markets in these products, including in
particular measures designed to attain stable, equitable and
remunerative prices, thus permitting an expansion of world trade and
demand and a dynamic and steady growth of the real export earnings of
these countries so as to provide them with expanding resources for their
economic development.
5. The rapid expansion of the economies of the less-developed
contracting parties will be facilitated by a diversification* of the
structure of their economies and the avoidance of an excessive
dependence on the export of primary products. There is, therefore, need
for increased access in the largest possible measure to markets under
favourable conditions for processed and manufactured products currently
or potentially of particular export interest to less-developed
contracting parties.
6. Because of the chronic deficiency in the export proceeds and other
foreign exchange earnings of less-developed contracting parties, there
are important interrelationships between trade and financial assistance
to development. There is, therefore, need for close and continuing
collaboration between the CONTRACTING PARTIES and the international
lending agencies so that they can contribute most effectively to
alleviating the burdens these less-developed contracting parties assume
in the interest of their economic development.
7. There is need for appropriate collaboration between the
CONTRACTING PARTIES, other intergovernmental bodies and the organs and
agencies of the United Nations system, whose activities relate to the
trade and economic development of less-developed countries.
8. The developed contracting parties do not expect reciprocity for
commitments made by them in trade negotiations to reduce or remove
tariffs and other barriers to the trade of less-developed contracting
parties.*
9. The adoption of measures to give effect to these principles and
objectives shall be a matter of conscious and purposeful effort on the
part of the contracting parties both individually and jointly.
B. Text of Note Ad Article XXXVI
Ad Article XXXVI: Paragraph 1
This Article is based upon the objectives set forth in
Article I as
it will be amended by Section A of paragraph 1 of the Protocol Amending
Part I and Articles XXIX and XXX when that Protocol enters into force.(1)
(footnote original)
1 This Protocol was abandoned on 1 January
1968.
Paragraph 4
The term “primary products” includes agricultural products, vide
paragraph 2 of the note ad Article XVI, Section B.
Paragraph 5
A diversification programme would generally include the
intensification of activities for the processing of primary products and
the development of manufacturing industries, taking into account the
situation of the particular contracting party and the world outlook for
production and consumption of different commodities.
Paragraph 8
It is understood that the phrase “do not expect reciprocity”
means, in accordance with the objectives set forth in this Article, that
the less-developed contracting parties should not be expected, in the
course of trade negotiations, to make contributions which are
inconsistent with their individual development, financial and trade
needs, taking into consideration past trade developments.
This paragraph would apply in the event of action under
Section A of
Article XVIII, Article XXVIII, Article XXVIII bis
(Article XXIX
after the amendment set forth in Section A of paragraph 1 of the
Protocol Amending Part I and Articles XXIX and
XXX shall have become effective(2)), Article
XXXIII, or any other procedure under this
Agreement.
(footnote original)
2 This Protocol was abandoned on 1 January
1968.
C. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXVI
1. General
1096. Trade and development under the WTO Agreement, including
special and differential treatment for developing country Members
generally, is dealt with in the Chapter on the WTO Agreement. Where such
treatment involves a derogation from MFN treatment under the GATT, see
above under Article I.
2. WTO Work Programme for the Least-Developed Countries
1097. Pursuant to paragraph 42 of the Doha Declaration, the WTO Work
Programme for the LDCs was adopted by the Sub-Committee on LDCs
(hereinafter the Sub-Committee) on 12 February 2002.(1501) Since
then, the Sub-Committee has mainly focussed on its implementation, and
has considered the systemic issues forming part of it, in particular
elements such as market access for LDCs, accession of LDCs to the WTO,
technical assistance and capacity-building initiatives for LDCs. The
Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration has mandated the continued
implementation of this Work Programme.(1502) With respect to the
mandate of the Doha Declaration and the negotiations on least-developed
countries, see paragraphs 42–43 of the Doha Declaration in Section
XXVII.A below.
1098. Market access is considered at every Sub-Committee meeting. To
assist this work, the Secretariat has prepared notes on market access
issues for products and services of export interest to LDCs, including
information on LDCs’ export profile, their major products, major
markets, tariff measures facing their products and measures taken by
Members to improve LDCs’ market access.(1503)
1099. The Sub-Committee played an instrumental role in developing the
Guidelines on LDC Accessions, which were adopted by the General Council
in December 2002.(1504) The Secretariat has provided regular
updates to the Sub-Committee on the state-of-play of LDC accessions.
1100. Trade-related technical assistance and capacity-building
initiatives form a core element of the Work Programme. The Sub-Committee
has considered WTO technical assistance and training in support of the
LDCs as well as other capacity-building initiatives taken in favour of
LDCs such as the Integrated Framework for LDCs (IF).(1505)
1101. The Committee on Trade and Development adopted Guidelines for
WTO Technical Cooperation on 15 October 1996.(1506) On 13
December 1996, the Singapore Ministerial Conference adopted a
Comprehensive and Integrated WTO Plan of Action for the Least-Developed
Countries.(1507) The Plan of Action “offers a comprehensive
approach and includes measures relating to the implementation of the
Decision in Favour of Least-Developed Countries, as well as in the areas
of capacity-building and market access from a WTO perspective.”(1508)
3. Integrated Framework (IF), Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) and
Aid for Trade
1102. The Integrated Framework (IF), a multi-donor programme to
assist LDCs in playing a more active role in the global trading system,
was initially established in October 1997, at the High-Level Meeting on
Integrated Initiatives for Least-Developed Countries’ Trade
Development convened by the WTO. The High-Level Meeting brought together
the WTO, UNCTAD, the ITC, the IMF, UNDP and the World Bank, the six core
agencies implementing the IF.(1509) At the High-Level Meeting,
Members (i) endorsed the “Integrated Framework for Trade-Related
Technical Assistance, including for Human and Institutional Capacity-Building, to Support Least-Developed Countries in Their Trade and
Trade-Related Activities” (IF)(1510), (ii) recommended “all
WTO Members to keep under active review all options for improving market
access for least-developed countries presented in the Comprehensive and
Integrated WTO Plan of Action for the Least-Developed Countries and to
monitor the implementation of the commitments made in this regard”(1511),
and (iii) “took note of the two reports and the recommendations”
produced in the two roundtable discussions.(1512)
1103. The main objective of the IF was to improve the capacity of the
LDCs to formulate, negotiate and implement trade policy so as to be able
to fully integrate into the multilateral trading system and to take up
the market opportunities this presents. In 2000 the Sub-Committee
conducted a review of options for improving LDCs’ market access(1513),
and the IF’s six core agencies also conducted a review of the IF, and
decided to revamp it.(1514) To implement this decision, the
Sub-Committee on Least-Developed Countries adopted the IF Proposal for a
Pilot Scheme with two objectives: mainstreaming trade into LDCs’
national development strategies, and assisting in coordinated delivery
of trade-related assistance to LDCs.(1515) Following a second
evaluation of the IF, the IFSC approved a work programme for the IF in
February 2004, extended in November 2005. Since then, the IFWG and IFSC
have been implementing the work programme.(1516)
1104. In 2005, the WTO created a Task Force on an enhanced IF, in
response to a call by the World Bank and the IMF. The December 2005 Hong
Kong Ministerial Declaration welcomed this Task Force, and endorsed
three elements of an enhanced IF: (i) increased, predictable, and
additional funding to implement action matrices, (ii) strengthened
in-country capacities to manage, implement and monitor the IF process,
and (iii) improved IF governance. The Task Force’s work concluded with
IFWG and IFSC adoption of its recommendations in July 2006.(1517)
1105. The Enhanced IF (EIF) is a multi-donor programme to support
LDCs’ own efforts to mainstream trade into national development
strategies; set up structures needed to coordinate delivery of
trade-related technical assistance; and build capacity to trade,
including addressing critical supply-side constraints. The EIF now
assists LDCs worldwide, supported by the multi-donor EIF Trust Fund. It
moves forward through the efforts of the EIF Executive Secretariat
housed in the WTO; the EIF Board; the EIF Steering Committee; and the
EIF Trust Fund Manager.(1518)
1106. The Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration also endorsed expansion
of Aid for Trade.(1519) Three Global Reviews of Aid for Trade
have been held in the Committee on Trade and Development. The Second
Review established the Aid-for-Trade Work Programme 2010–2011, of
which implementation is ongoing.(1520)
4. Favourable and more preferential treatment for developing
countries
1107. The Singapore Plan of Action for the Least-Developed Countries
also includes “provision for taking positive measures, for example
duty-free access, on an autonomous basis, aimed at improving their
overall capacity to respond to the opportunities offered by the trading
system.”(1521) Paragraph 42 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration
commits WTO Members “to the objective of duty-free, quota-free market
access for products originating from LDCs” and “to consider
additional measures for progressive improvements in market access for
LDCs.”(1522) The Decision on Implementation-related Issues and
Concerns, combined with paragraph 12 of the Doha Declaration aimed to
provide a two-track solution to the issue faced by developing countries
of implementing the WTO agreements.(1523)
5. Work Programme on Small Economies, Paragraph 35 of the Doha
Ministerial Declaration
1108. In paragraph 35 of the Doha Ministerial
Declaration(1524),
Ministers established a work programme under the auspices of the General
Council to examine issues relating to the trade of small economies with
the objective of framing responses to the trade-related issues
identified for the fuller integration of small, vulnerable economies
into the multilateral trading system, without creating a sub-category of
WTO Members. On 1 March 2002, the General Council took note of a
framework and procedures for the conduct of the Work Programme on Small
Economies(1525)
and instructed the Committee on Trade and
Development (CTD) to conduct this programme of work in Dedicated
Sessions and to report regularly on the progress of its work to the
General Council.
1109. On 10 October 2006, the General Council agreed to the
recommendations in a report by the CTD on Measures to Assist Small
Economies in Meeting their Obligations under the Agreements on SPS
Measures, TBT and TRIPS(1526), including instance, allowing small
economies to use regional bodies to assist them in implementation of SPS,
TBT and TRIPS obligations (it being understood that individual Members
remain legally responsible for their individual notifications and other
obligations under these Agreements).
6. GATT practice
1110. See GATT Analytical Index.
XL. Article XXXVII
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXVII
Article XXXVII: Commitments
1.
The developed contracting parties shall to the fullest extent
possible — that is, except when compelling reasons, which may
include legal reasons, make it impossible — give effect to the
following provisions:
(a) accord high priority to the reduction and elimination of
barriers to products currently or potentially of particular export
interest to less-developed contracting parties, including customs duties
and other restrictions which differentiate unreasonably between such
products in their primary and in their processed forms;*
(b) refrain from introducing, or increasing the incidence of,
customs duties or non-tariff import barriers on products currently or
potentially of particular export interest to less-developed contracting
parties; and
(c) (i)
refrain from imposing new fiscal measures, and
(ii) in any adjustments of fiscal policy accord high priority to the
reduction and elimination of fiscal measures, which would hamper, or
which hamper, significantly the growth of consumption of primary
products, in raw or processed form, wholly or mainly produced in the
territories of less-developed contracting parties, and which are applied
specifically to those products.
2. (a)
Whenever it is considered that effect is not being
given to any of the provisions of subparagraph
(a), (b) or (c) of
paragraph 1, the matter shall be reported to the CONTRACTING PARTIES
either by the contracting party not so giving effect to the relevant
provisions or by any other interested contracting party.
(b) (i)
The CONTRACTING PARTIES shall, if requested so to do
by any interested contracting party, and without prejudice to any
bilateral consultations that may be undertaken, consult with the
contracting party concerned and all interested contracting parties with
respect to the matter with a view to reaching solutions satisfactory to
all contracting parties concerned in order to further the objectives set
forth in Article XXXVI. In the course of these consultations, the
reasons given in cases where effect was not being given to the
provisions of subparagraph (a), (b) or
(c) of paragraph 1 shall be
examined.
(ii)
As the implementation of the provisions of subparagraph
(a), (b)
or (c) of paragraph 1 by individual contracting parties may in some
cases be more readily achieved where action is taken jointly with other
developed contracting parties, such consultation might, where
appropriate, be directed towards this end.
(iii)
The consultations by the CONTRACTING PARTIES might also, in
appropriate cases, be directed towards agreement on joint action
designed to further the objectives of this Agreement as envisaged in
paragraph 1 of Article XXV.
3. The developed contracting parties shall:
(a) make every effort, in cases where a government directly or
indirectly determines the resale price of products wholly or mainly
produced in the territories of less-developed contracting parties, to
maintain trade margins at equitable levels;
(b) give active consideration to the adoption of other
measures* designed to provide greater scope for the development of
imports from less-developed contracting parties and collaborate in
appropriate international action to this end;
(c) have special regard to the trade interests of
less-developed contracting parties when considering the application of
other measures permitted under this Agreement to meet particular
problems and explore all possibilities of constructive remedies before
applying such measures where they would affect essential interests of
those contracting parties.
4. Less-developed contracting parties agree to take appropriate
action in implementation of the provisions of Part IV for the benefit of
the trade of other less-developed contracting parties, in so far as such
action is consistent with their individual present and future
development, financial and trade needs taking into account past trade
developments as well as the trade interests of less-developed
contracting parties as a whole.
5. In the implementation of the commitments set forth in
paragraphs 1
to 4 each contracting party shall afford to any other interested
contracting party or contracting parties full and prompt opportunity for
consultations under the normal procedures of this Agreement with respect
to any matter or difficulty which may arise.
B. Text of Ad Article XXXVII
Ad Article XXXVII: Paragraph 1 (a)
This paragraph would apply in the event of negotiations for reduction
or elimination of tariffs or other restrictive regulations of commerce
under Articles XXVIII, XXVIII bis
(XXIX after the amendment set
forth in Section A of paragraph 1 of the Protocol Amending Part I and
Articles XXIX and XXX shall have become
effective(13)), and Article XXXIII,
as well as in connection with other action to effect such reduction or
elimination which contracting parties may be able to undertake.
Paragraph 3 (b)
The other measures referred to in this paragraph might include steps
to promote domestic structural changes, to encourage the consumption of
particular products, or to introduce measures of trade promotion.
C. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXVII
1. General
1111. Trade and development under the WTO Agreement, including
special and differential treatment for developing country Members
generally, is dealt with in the Chapter on the WTO Agreement. Where such
treatment involves a derogation from MFN treatment under the GATT, see
above under Article I.
2. GATT practice
1112. See GATT Analytical Index.
XLI. Article XXXVIII
back to top
A. Text of Article XXXVIII
Article XXXVIII: Joint Action
1. The contracting parties shall collaborate jointly, within the
framework of this Agreement and elsewhere, as appropriate, to further
the objectives set forth in Article XXXVI.
2. In particular, the CONTRACTING PARTIES shall:
(a) where appropriate, take action, including action through
international arrangements, to provide improved and acceptable
conditions of access to world markets for primary products of particular
interest to less-developed contracting parties and to devise measures
designed to stabilize and improve conditions of world markets in these
products including measures designed to attain stable, equitable and
remunerative prices for exports of such products;
(b) seek appropriate collaboration in matters of trade and
development policy with the United Nations and its organs and agencies,
including any institutions that may be created on the basis of
recommendations by the United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development;
(c) collaborate in analysing the development plans and
policies of individual less-developed contracting parties and in
examining trade and aid relationships with a view to devising concrete
measures to promote the development of export potential and to
facilitate access to export markets for the products of the industries
thus developed and, in this connection, seek appropriate collaboration
with governments and international organizations, and in particular with
organizations having competence in relation to financial assistance for
economic development, in systematic studies of trade and aid
relationships in individual less-developed contracting parties aimed at
obtaining a clear analysis of export potential, market prospects and any
further action that may be required;
(d) keep under continuous review the development of world
trade with special reference to the rate of growth of the trade of
less-developed contracting parties and make such recommendations to
contracting parties as may, in the circumstances, be deemed appropriate;
(e) collaborate in seeking feasible methods to expand trade
for the purpose of economic development, through international
harmonization and adjustment of national policies and regulations,
through technical and commercial standards affecting production,
transportation and marketing, and through export promotion by the
establishment of facilities for the increased flow of trade information
and the development of market research; and
(f) establish such institutional arrangements as may be
necessary to further the objectives set forth in Article XXXVI and to
give effect to the provision of this Part.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXXVIII
1. General
1113. Trade and development under the WTO Agreement, including
special and differential treatment for developing country Members
generally, is dealt with in the Chapter on the WTO Agreement. Where such
treatment involves a derogation from MFN treatment under the GATT, see
above under Article I.
2. GATT practice
1114. See GATT Analytical Index.
XLII. Table of Regional Trade Agreements Notified to the GATT/WTO and in Force, as of 30 September 2011
back to top
(in alphabetical order by the RTA name)
|
RTA Name |
Date of notification |
Date of entry into force |
Notified under |
|
Andean Community (CAN) |
01-Oct-90 |
25-May-88 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Armenia — Kazakhstan |
17-Jun-04 |
25-Dec-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Armenia — Moldova |
17-Jun-04 |
21-Dec-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Armenia — Russian Federation |
17-Jun-04 |
25-Mar-93 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Armenia — Turkmenistan |
17-Jun-04 |
07-Jul-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Armenia — Ukraine |
17-Jun-04 |
18-Dec-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
ASEAN — Australia — New Zealand |
08-Apr-10 |
01-Jan-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
ASEAN — China |
21-Sep-05(G)
26-Jun-08(S) |
01-Jan-05(G)
01-Jul-07(S) |
Enabling Clause & GATS Art. V |
|
ASEAN — India |
19-Aug-10 |
01-Jan-10 |
Enabling Clause |
|
ASEAN — Japan |
23-Nov-09 |
01-Dec-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
ASEAN — Korea, Republic of |
2010 |
01-Jan-10(G)
01-May-09(S) |
Enabling Clause & GATT Art.
XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) |
30-Oct-92 |
28-Jan-92 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Asia Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA) |
02-Nov-76 |
17-Jun-76 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Asia Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA) — Accession of
China |
30-Apr-04 |
01-Jan-02 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Australia — Chile |
03-Mar-09 |
06-Mar-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Australia — New Zealand (ANZCERTA) |
14-Apr-83(G)
22-Nov-95(S) |
01-Jan-83(G)
01-Jan-89(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Australia — Papua New Guinea (PATCRA) |
20-Dec-76 |
01-Feb-77 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Brunei Darussalam — Japan |
31-Jul-08 |
31-Jul-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Canada — Chile |
30-Jul-97 |
05-Jul-97 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Canada — Costa Rica |
13-Jan-03 |
01-Nov-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Canada — Israel |
15-Jan-97 |
01-Jan-97 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Canada — Peru |
31-Jul-09 |
01-Aug-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) |
14-Oct-74(G)
19-Feb-03(S) |
01-Aug-73(G)
01-Jul-97(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Central American Common Market (CACM) |
24-Feb-61 |
04-Jun-61 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA) 2006 |
26-Jul-07 |
01-May-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Chile — China |
20-Jun-07(G)
18-Nov-10(S) |
01-Oct-06(G)
01-Aug-10(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Chile — Colombia |
14-Aug-09 |
08-May-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Chile — Costa Rica |
16-Apr-02 |
15-Feb-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
(Chile — Central America)
Chile — El Salvador |
29-Jan-04(G) |
01-Jun-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
(Chile — Central America)
Chile — India |
05-Feb-04(S)
13-Jan-09 |
17-Aug-07 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Chile — Japan |
24-Aug-07 |
03-Sep-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Chile — Mexico |
27-Feb-01 |
01-Aug-99 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
China — Hong Kong, China |
27-Dec-03 |
01-Jan-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
China — Macao, China |
27-Dec-03 |
01-Jan-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
China — New Zealand |
21-Apr-09 |
01-Oct-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
China — Singapore |
02-Mar-09 |
01-Jan-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Colombia — Mexico |
13-Sep-10 |
01-Jan-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Common Economic Zone (CEZ) |
18-Aug-08 |
20-May-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) |
04-May-95 |
08-Dec-94 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) |
29-Jun-99 |
30-Dec-94 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Costa Rica — Mexico |
17-Jul-06 |
01-Jan-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
Dominican Republic — Central America — United
States
Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) |
17-Mar-06 |
01-Mar-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
East African Community (EAC) |
09-Oct-00
07-Mar-07(G) |
07-Jul-00
01-Dec-06(G) |
Enabling Clause |
|
EC — Albania |
07-Oct-09(S) |
01-Apr-09(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Algeria |
24-Jul-06 |
01-Sep-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Andorra |
23-Feb-98 |
01-Jul-91 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Bosnia and Herzegovina |
11-Jul-08 |
01-Jul-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Cameroon |
24-Sep-09 |
01-Oct-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — CARIFORUM States EPA |
16-Oct-08
03-Feb-04(G) |
01-Nov-08
01-Feb-03(G) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Chile |
28-Oct-05(S) |
01-Mar-05(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Côte d’Ivoire |
11-Dec-08
17-Dec-02(G) |
01-Jan-09
01-Mar-02(G) |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Croatia |
12-Oct-09(S) |
01-Feb-05(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Egypt |
03-Sep-04 |
01-Jun-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Faroe Islands |
17-Feb-97
23-Oct-01(G) |
01-Jan-97
01-Jun-01(G) |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
02-Oct-09(S) |
01-Apr-04(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Iceland |
24-Nov-72 |
01-Apr-73 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Israel |
20-Sep-00 |
01-Jun-00 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Jordan |
17-Dec-02 |
01-May-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Lebanon |
26-May-03
25-Jul-00(G) |
01-Mar-03
01-Jul-00(G) |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Mexico |
21-Jun-02(S)
16-Jan-08(G) |
01-Oct-00(S)
01-Jan-08(G) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Montenegro |
18-Jun-10(S) |
01-May-10(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC — Morocco |
13-Oct-00 |
01-Mar-00 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Norway |
13-Jul-73 |
01-Jul-73 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) |
14-Dec-70 |
01-Jan-71 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Palestinian Authority |
29-May-97 |
01-Jul-97 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — South Africa |
02-Nov-00 |
01-Jan-00 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Switzerland — Liechtenstein |
27-Oct-72 |
01-Jan-73 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Syria |
15-Jul-77 |
01-Jul-77 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Tunisia |
15-Jan-99 |
01-Mar-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC — Turkey |
22-Dec-95 |
01-Jan-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC (10) Enlargement |
24-Oct-79 |
01-Jan-81 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC (12) Enlargement |
11-Dec-85 15-Dec-94(G) |
01-Jan-86 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC (15) Enlargement |
22-Dec-94(S) |
01-Jan-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC (25) Enlargement |
26-Apr-04 27-Sep-06(G) |
01-May-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC (27) Enlargement |
26-Jun-07(S) |
01-Jan-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EC (9) Enlargement |
07-Mar-72 24-Apr-57(G) |
01-Jan-73 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EC Treaty |
10-Nov-95(S) |
01-Jan-58 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa (CEMAC) |
21-Jul-99 |
24-Jun-99 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) |
06-Jul-05 |
24-Jul-93 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) |
10-Jul-92 |
17-Feb-92 |
Enabling Clause |
|
EFTA — Albania |
07-Feb-11 |
01-Nov-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Canada |
04-Aug-09 |
01-Jul-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Chile |
03-Dec-04 |
01-Dec-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EFTA — Colombia |
14-Sep-11 |
01-Jul-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EFTA — Croatia |
14-Jan-02 |
01-Jan-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Egypt |
17-Jul-07 |
01-Aug-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
11-Dec-00 |
01-Jan-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Israel |
30-Nov-92 |
01-Jan-93 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Jordan |
17-Jan-02 |
01-Jan-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Korea, Republic of |
23-Aug-06 |
01-Sep-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EFTA — Lebanon |
22-Dec-06 |
01-Jan-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Mexico |
25-Jul-01 |
01-Jul-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EFTA — Morocco |
20-Jan-00 |
01-Dec-99 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Palestinian Authority |
23-Jul-99 |
01-Jul-99 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Peru |
30-Jun-11 |
01-Jul-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — SACU |
29-Oct-08 |
01-May-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Serbia |
24-Nov-10 |
01-Oct-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Singapore |
14-Jan-03 |
01-Jan-03 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EFTA — Tunisia |
03-Jun-05 |
01-Jun-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA — Turkey |
06-Mar-92 |
01-Apr-92 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EFTA accession of Iceland |
30-Jan-70 |
01-Mar-70 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Egypt — Turkey |
05-Oct-07 |
01-Mar-07 |
Enabling Clause |
|
EU — Korea, Republic of |
07-Jul-11 |
01-Jul-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
EU — San Marino |
24-Feb-10 |
01-Apr-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
EU — Serbia |
31-May-10 |
01-Feb-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC) |
21-Apr-99 |
08-Oct-97 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
European Economic Area (EEA) |
13-Sep-96
14-Nov-59(G) |
01-Jan-94
03-May-60(G) |
GATS Art. V |
|
European Free Trade Association (EFTA) |
15-Jul-02(S) |
01-Jun-02(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Faroe Islands — Norway |
12-Feb-96 |
01-Jul-93 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Faroe Islands — Switzerland |
12-Feb-96 |
01-Mar-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Georgia — Armenia |
08-Feb-01 |
11-Nov-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Georgia — Azerbaijan |
08-Feb-01 |
10-Jul-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Georgia — Kazakhstan |
08-Feb-01 |
16-Jul-99 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Georgia — Russian Federation |
08-Feb-01 |
10-May-94 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Georgia — Turkmenistan |
08-Feb-01 |
01-Jan-00 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Georgia — Ukraine |
08-Feb-01 |
04-Jun-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries (GSTP) |
25-Sep-89 |
19-Apr-89 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Guatemala — the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu |
11-Jul-11 |
01-Jul-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V
Enabling Clause & GATT Art. |
|
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) |
2007 / 2009 |
01-Jan-03 |
XXIV |
|
Honduras — El Salvador and the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu |
06-Apr-10 |
01-Mar-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Hong Kong, China — New Zealand |
03-Jan-11 |
01-Jan-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Iceland — Faroe Islands |
10-Jul-08 |
01-Nov-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
India — Afghanistan |
08-Mar-10 |
13-May-03 |
Enabling Clause |
|
India — Bhutan |
30-Jun-08 |
29-Jul-06 |
Enabling Clause |
|
India — Japan |
14-Sep-11 |
01-Aug-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
India — Malaysia |
06-Sep-11 |
01-Jul-11 |
Enabling Clause & GATS Art. V |
|
India — Nepal |
02-Aug-10 |
27-Oct-09 |
Enabling Clause |
|
India — Singapore |
03-May-07 |
01-Aug-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
India — Sri Lanka |
17-Jun-02 |
15-Dec-01 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Israel — Mexico |
22-Feb-01 |
01-Jul-00 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Japan — Indonesia |
27-Jun-08 |
01-Jul-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Malaysia |
12-Jul-06 |
13-Jul-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Mexico |
31-Mar-05 |
01-Apr-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Philippines |
11-Dec-08 |
11-Dec-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Singapore |
08-Nov-02 |
30-Nov-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Switzerland |
01-Sep-09 |
01-Sep-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Thailand |
25-Oct-07 |
01-Nov-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Japan — Viet Nam |
01-Oct-09 |
01-Oct-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Jordan — Singapore |
07-Jul-06 |
22-Aug-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Korea, Republic of — Chile |
08-Apr-04 |
01-Apr-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V Enabling Clause & GATT
Art. |
|
Korea, Republic of — India |
2010 |
01-Jan-10 |
XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Korea, Republic of — Singapore |
21-Feb-06 |
02-Mar-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Kyrgyz Republic — Armenia |
12-Dec-00 |
27-Oct-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Kyrgyz Republic — Kazakhstan |
29-Jun-99 |
11-Nov-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Kyrgyz Republic — Moldova |
15-Jun-99 |
21-Nov-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Kyrgyz Republic — Russian Federation |
15-Jun-99 |
24-Apr-93 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Kyrgyz Republic — Ukraine |
15-Jun-99 |
19-Jan-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Kyrgyz Republic — Uzbekistan |
15-Jun-99 |
20-Mar-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Lao People’s Democratic Republic — Thailand |
26-Nov-91 |
20-Jun-91 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Latin American Integration Association (LAIA) |
01-Jul-82 |
18-Mar-81 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) |
03-Aug-99 |
01-Jan-94 |
Enabling Clause |
|
MERCOSUR — India |
23-Feb-10 |
01-Jun-09 |
Enabling Clause |
Mexico — El Salvador
(Mexico — Northern Triangle) |
23-May-06 |
15-Mar-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
Mexico — Guatemala
(Mexico — Northern Triangle) |
03-Jul-06 |
15-Mar-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
Mexico — Honduras
(Mexico — Northern Triangle) |
10-Jul-06(G)
20-Jun-06(S) |
01-Jun-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Mexico — Nicaragua |
17-Oct-05 |
01-Jul-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
New Zealand — Singapore |
04-Sep-01 |
01-Jan-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Nicaragua and the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu |
09-Jul-09 29-Jan-93(G) |
01-Jan-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) |
01-Mar-95(S) |
01-Jan-94 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA) |
28-Aug-08
18-Jan-08(G) |
13-Apr-03
01-Jul-07(G) |
Enabling Clause |
|
Pakistan — China |
20-May-10(S) |
10-Oct-09(S) |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Pakistan — Malaysia |
19-Feb-08 |
01-Jan-08 |
Enabling Clause & GATS Art. V |
|
Pakistan — Sri Lanka |
11-Jun-08 |
12-Jun-05 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Panama — Chile |
17-Apr-08 |
07-Mar-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
Panama — Costa Rica
(Panama — Central America) |
07-Apr-09 |
23-Nov-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
Panama — El Salvador
(Panama — Central America) |
24-Feb-05 |
11-Apr-03 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
Panama — Honduras
(Panama — Central America ) |
16-Dec-09 |
09-Jan-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Panama — Singapore |
04-Apr-07 |
24-Jul-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Panama and the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu |
28-Jul-09 |
01-Jan-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Pan-Arab Free Trade Area (PAFTA) |
03-Oct-06 |
01-Jan-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Peru — China |
03-Mar-10 |
01-Mar-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Peru — Korea, Republic of |
09-Aug-11 |
01-Aug-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Peru — Singapore |
30-Jul-09 |
01-Aug-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Protocol on Trade Negotiations (PTN) |
09-Nov-71 |
11-Feb-73 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Singapore — Australia |
25-Sep-03 |
28-Jul-03 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) |
21-Apr-08 |
01-Jan-06 |
Enabling Clause |
|
South Asian Preferential Trade Arrangement (SAPTA) |
21-Apr-97 |
07-Dec-95 |
Enabling Clause |
|
South Pacific Regional Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement
(SPARTECA) |
07-Jan-81 |
01-Jan-81 |
Enabling Clause |
|
Southern African Customs Union (SACU) |
25-Jun-07 |
15-Jul-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Southern African Development Community (SADC) |
02-Aug-04
17-Feb-91(G) |
01-Sep-00
29-Nov-91(G) |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) |
05-Dec-06(S) |
07-Dec-05(S) |
Enabling Clause & GATS Art. V |
|
Thailand — Australia |
27-Dec-04 |
01-Jan-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Thailand — New Zealand |
01-Dec-05 |
01-Jul-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership |
18-May-07 |
28-May-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
Turkey — Albania |
09-May-08 |
01-May-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Bosnia and Herzegovina |
29-Aug-03 |
01-Jul-03 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Chile |
25-Feb-11 |
01-Mar-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Croatia |
02-Sep-03 |
01-Jul-03 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
05-Jan-01 |
01-Sep-00 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Georgia |
18-Feb-09 |
01-Nov-08 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Israel |
16-Apr-98 |
01-May-97 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Jordan |
07-Mar-11 |
01-Mar-11 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Montenegro |
12-Mar-10 |
01-Mar-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Morocco |
10-Feb-06 |
01-Jan-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Palestinian Authority |
01-Sep-05 |
01-Jun-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Serbia |
10-Aug-10 |
01-Sep-10 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Syria |
15-Feb-07 |
01-Jan-07 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Turkey — Tunisia |
01-Sep-05 |
01-Jul-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Azerbaijan |
18-Aug-08 |
02-Sep-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Belarus |
18-Aug-08 |
11-Nov-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
18-Aug-08 |
05-Jul-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Kazakhstan |
18-Aug-08 |
19-Oct-98 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Moldova |
18-Aug-08 |
19-May-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Russian Federation |
18-Aug-08 |
21-Feb-94 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Tajikistan |
18-Aug-08 |
11-Jul-02 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Turkmenistan |
18-Aug-08 |
04-Nov-95 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
Ukraine — Uzbekistan |
18-Aug-08 |
01-Jan-96 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
US — Australia |
22-Dec-04 |
01-Jan-05 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Bahrain |
08-Sep-06 |
01-Aug-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Chile |
16-Dec-03 |
01-Jan-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Israel |
13-Sep-85 |
19-Aug-85 |
GATT Art. XXIV |
|
US — Jordan |
15-Jan-02 |
17-Dec-01 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Morocco |
30-Dec-05 |
01-Jan-06 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Oman |
30-Jan-09 |
01-Jan-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Peru |
03-Feb-09 |
01-Feb-09 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
US — Singapore |
17-Dec-03 |
01-Jan-04 |
GATT Art. XXIV & GATS Art. V |
|
West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) |
27-Oct-99 |
01-Jan-00 |
Enabling Clause |
Footnotes:
1487. GATT Analytical Index, p. 216. back to text
1488. Panel Report, EC — Poultry, para. 215.
back
to text
1489. Appellate Body Report, EC — Poultry, para.
102. back to text
1490. (footnote original) EPCT/TAC/PV/18, p. 46; see Panel
Report, para. 217. back to text
1491. Appellate Body Report, EC — Poultry,
para.
100. back to text
1492. Panel Report, EC — Poultry,
para. 215. back to text
1493. G/C/M/42, para. 4. back to text
1494. G/MA/M/26, Section 6. back to text
1495. G/MA/W/23/Rev.7.
A list of Article XXVII renegotiations
appears in the GATT Analytical Index at pp. 967–984; see also
TAR/W/7 on Article XXVII negotiations up to June 1980. back to text
1496. BISD 27S/26. back to text
1497. G/MA/W/23/Rev.7. Two of the 15 theoretically ongoing
negotiations concerned the schedules of Hungary and Bulgaria, which were
later withdrawn in the context of EU enlargement. back to text
1498. G/MA/W/23/Rev.7
and later revisions; see also interactive
table on the WTO website at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/schedules_e/goods_schedules_table_e.htm. back to text
1499. G/L/695 and Add.1–13; G/L/821 and Add.1–8; see also
e.g. G/C/M/104. back to text
1500. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, para. 16. back to text
1501. WT/COMTD/LDC/11. back to text
1502. WT/MIN(05)/DEC, para. 47. back to text
1503. WT/COMTD/LDC/W/28; WT/COMTD/LDC/W/31; WT/COMTD/LDC/W/35;
WT/COMTD/LDC/W/38 and Corr.;
W/COMTD/LDC/W/41; WT/COMTD/LDC/W/42 and
Rev.1; WT/COMTD/W/46 and Rev.1; WT/COMTD/48 and Rev.1. See also
Secretariat Notes done for the Sub-Committee on options for LDCs to
improve competitiveness in textiles and clothing (WT/COMTD/LDC/W/37);
non-tariff measures on products of export interest to LDCs
(WT/COMTD/LDC/W/39 and Add.1). back to text
1504. WT/L/508. Concerning accessions, see the material on
WTO
Article XII in the Chapter on the WTO Agreement. back to text
1505. The Integrated Framework for trade-related technical
assistance to LDCs has its own governing bodies, which are the
Integrated Framework Working Group (IFWG) and the Integrated Framework
Steering Committee (IFSC). For records of IFSC meetings, see the
WT/IFSC/M/series. back to text
1506. WT/COMTD/M/12, para. 4; adopted
guidelines, WT/COMTD/8. back to text
1507. WT/MIN(96)/DEC, para. 14. Plan of Action: WT/MIN(96)/14.
back to text
1508. WT/MIN(96)/14,
para. 3. back to text
1509. WT/LDC/HL/M/1 plus
Add.1 and in WT/LDC/HL/23. back to text
1510. Integrated Framework text: WT/LDC/HL/1/Rev.1. back to text
1511. WT/LDC/HL/23, p. 1. back to text
1512. WT/LDC/HL/23, p. 2. The text of the recommendations can be
found in WT/LDC/HL/23, pp. 5–10. back to text
1513. WT/LDC/HL/1/Rev.1, para. 6. back to text
1514. See WT/LDC/SWG/IF/2 (joint statement by heads of six IF
agencies, 12 July 2000). back to text
1515. WT/LDC/SWG/IF/13. back to text
1516. WT/IFSC/7 and Rev.1. back to text
1517. WT/IFSC/W/15 and Corr.1. back to text
1518. WT/GC/115. back to text
1519. WT/MIN(05)/DEC, para. 57. back to text
1520. WT/COMTD/AFT/W/16 and
Add.1. back to text
1521. WT/MIN(96)/DEC,
para. 14, first item. back to text
1522. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, para 42. back to text
1523. WT/MIN(01)/17. back to text
1524. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1. back to text
1525. WT/L/447. back to text
1526. WT/COMTD/SE/5; WT/GC/M/104. back to text
|