THIS NEWS STORY is designed to help the public understand developments in the WTO. While every effort has been made to ensure the contents are accurate, it does not prejudice member governments’ positions.
The official record is in the meeting’s minutes.
US: farm subsidies notification
Members raised questions regarding the United States’ latest notification on the amount of its domestic subsidies for 2014, the first year since the new US farm bill was implemented. According to the US notification, the total trade-distorting farm subsidies — known as the aggregate measure of support - amounted to USD 3.8 billion, well below the US committed level of USD 19.1 billion.
The US answered various questions — from China, Japan, Australia, Guatemala, Brazil, Canada and the EU - on particular aspects of the notification, including support for specific farm products, and how certain subsidies are classified. On China’s request for data about the scale of the farms listed in its agriculture notifications, the US said it did not have such data.
EU: domestic farm support, and price support for livestock
The European Union provided detailed information on its latest notification of domestic farm subsidies for 2013/2014. The EU’s notification indicated that EUR 5.9 billion of trade-distorting domestic subsidies were spent over the marketing year 2013/2014, while the EU is entitled to EUR 72.3 billion of aggregate measure of support.
Under a separate agenda item, the EU answered questions on its farm support programmes for livestock. In October 2015, the European Commission announced a package of measures for the livestock sector, according to New Zealand which raised the question. The EU said that although it is not able to specify the amount of aid as EU member states can set up their own finance schemes, the spending on the support will be included in future domestic support notifications.
India: price support programme for wheat, sugar cane and crops
India responded to questions from Australia on its minimum support price for wheat. India said its support prices depended on various factors including the cost of cultivation and market price, and more information could be found on its government website.
According to Australia, the government of India has raised the support price for wheat every year since 2006. Australia expressed the view that wheat prices had been declining in recent years, and any wheat policies that could affect world prices deserved close attention. The United States, Ukraine, Canada and the European Union indicated their interest in the question.
Separately, India responded to questions concerning its price support for sugar cane in the state of Uttar Pradesh, buffer stocks of pulses, and its price support for rabi and kharif crops. Rabi crops include wheat, barley, mustard, sesame and peas; they are sown in the winter season and harvested in the spring. Kharif crops are grown during the monsoon season and include crops such as rice, millet, corn, cotton and sugarcane.
These questions were raised by the European Union, Canada and the United States. Major crop exporters such as Ukraine and Australia indicated their interest in the question. India explained that the objective of these programmes is to safeguard farmers’ livelihood, and it provided web links where information on the reference prices can be found.
Canada: dairy policies
Once again, Canada’s milk ingredients policy received much attention from members. Australia, the EU, New Zealand and the US questioned Canada on its special milk class permit programme, which had been circulated by the Canadian Dairy Commission in February 2017. These members argued that the measure would allow subsidised skimmed milk to be used as an ingredient for cheese, and thus render domestic milk proteins cheaper than imported milk proteins.
Canada provided details on the implementation of the policy, noting that the decision to create the dairy ingredient strategy was driven by the industry.
Also, Canada’s cheese import tariff rate quota allocation once again received much interest. A tariff rate quota is a trade policy instrument where tariffs are lower for within-quota imports than tariffs on imports exceeding the quota. New Zealand, Norway and Switzerland said that Canada allocated additional import quota to the EU in the context of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) negotiations, without consulting its trading partners. Canada said the reallocation was due to the enlargement of the EU, and it had held consultations with importers to decide the amount.
For the first time, the question of Brexit was discussed at the Committee. Indonesia asked the European Union to clarify how the United Kingdom intends to allocate its tariff rate quotas for agriculture products, and what would be the procedure to grant the generalized scheme of preferences to developing countries. The United States, Argentina, China and Russia signalled their interest in this matter.
In a brief response, the EU said that the EU common external trade policy applies to all its member states and the UK is still a member of the EU. It would provide a more substantive reply in due course.
Switzerland: export subsidies
Switzerland responded to questions on its 2016 budget for export subsidies, as well as its export subsidies notification for 2015. In those notifications, Switzerland had reported an increase in export subsidies to “processed products” — specifically for Swiss chocolate producers using Swiss-produced ingredients, known as the “Chocolate Law”. Switzerland said the increased budget was due to the appreciation of the Swiss franc in January 2015, and the notified amount was substantially below Switzerland’s entitlements.
New Zealand recalled the 2013 Bali ministerial decision and 2015 Nairobi ministerial decision to scrap export subsidies, which calls for all WTO members to “exercise utmost restraint with regard to any recourse to all forms of export subsidies and all export measures with equivalent effect”. The EU, the US and Ukraine registered their interest in this matter.
Although according to the Nairobi Ministerial Decision the elimination of export subsidies for "processed products" does not have to be immediate in the case of Switzerland, WTO members encouraged Switzerland to abolish the export subsidies at the earliest possible date.
Implementation of the Nairobi export competition decision
Members shared updates of how they have implemented the Nairobi export competition decision.
Australia informed members that it had submitted its revised schedule of commitments on 17 February 2017, scrapping its entitlement for agriculture export subsidies. Norway said it is also following domestic procedures to revise its schedule.
Under the same agenda item, New Zealand answered a question by Chile on the progress of proposed amendments to the Kiwifruit Export Regulations, to enhance Kiwifruit New Zealand’s status as an independent regulator. New Zealand informed members that amendments are expected to be implemented by 1 July 2017.
Detailed questions and answers regarding each query can be found in the Agriculture Information Management System.
Chairperson: Garth EHRHARDT (Canada).
Next meeting: 7-8 June 2017
On the website:
- Agriculture news archives
- Explanation in “Understanding the WTO”
- Notifications and other documents can be found using pre-configured searches here
> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.